Cargando…
45. DELAY OR FAILURE TO ADMINISTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY TO THE CAVITY AFTER SURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES. AN INTENTION-TO-TREAT ANALYSIS
BACKGROUND: Data regarding the efficacy of adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for resected brain metastases (BM) is often limited to patients completing SRS within a specified timeframe. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis to determine local recurrence (LR) for all BM patients referred...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401377/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa073.033 |
_version_ | 1783566551180378112 |
---|---|
author | O’Brien, Diana Roth Kaye, Sydney Poppas, Phillip Mahase, Sean An, Anjile Christos, Paul Liechty, Benjamin Pisapia, David Ramakrishna, Rohan Wernicke, A Gabriella Knisely, Jonathan Pannullo, Susan Schwartz, Theodore |
author_facet | O’Brien, Diana Roth Kaye, Sydney Poppas, Phillip Mahase, Sean An, Anjile Christos, Paul Liechty, Benjamin Pisapia, David Ramakrishna, Rohan Wernicke, A Gabriella Knisely, Jonathan Pannullo, Susan Schwartz, Theodore |
author_sort | O’Brien, Diana Roth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Data regarding the efficacy of adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for resected brain metastases (BM) is often limited to patients completing SRS within a specified timeframe. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis to determine local recurrence (LR) for all BM patients referred for SRS. METHODS: We retrospectively identified resected BM patients referred for SRS between 2012 and 2018. Patients were divided based on delay to SRS into four categories: 1) ≤4 weeks, 2) >4–8 weeks, 3) >8 weeks, and 4) never received. We investigated the relationship between delay to SRS and LR, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and overall survival, as well as the predictors of and reason for delays. RESULTS: In our cohort of 159 patients, median age was 64.0 years, 56.5% patients were female, median tumor diameter was 2.9 cm, and gross total resection was achieved in 83.0%. On intention-to-treat analysis, LR was 22.6%. Delays to SRS correlated with LR: 2.3% with SRS ≤4 weeks postoperatively, 14.5% with SRS at >4–8 weeks (p=0.03), 48.5% with SRS at >8 weeks (p<0.001). No LR difference was observed with SRS delayed by >8 weeks, vs. never completed, 48.5% vs. 50.0% (p=0.91). 53 (33.3%) patients comprised these latter two categories. A similar relationship emerged between delay to SRS and LRFS (p<0.01). Non-small cell lung cancer pathology (p=0.04) and earlier year of treatment (p<0.01) were predictive of delays. Common reasons for delays included logistics, management of systemic disease, complications, or comorbidities. CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients referred for SRS never receive it, or are treated with a delay >8 weeks, conferring equivalent LR risk. Accordingly, the actual efficacy of adjuvant SRS may need reassessment. Reasons for delays and mechanisms for reducing them are discussed. For patients likely to experience significant delays, other techniques, such as preoperative SRS or intraoperative brachytherapy, may be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7401377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74013772020-08-06 45. DELAY OR FAILURE TO ADMINISTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY TO THE CAVITY AFTER SURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES. AN INTENTION-TO-TREAT ANALYSIS O’Brien, Diana Roth Kaye, Sydney Poppas, Phillip Mahase, Sean An, Anjile Christos, Paul Liechty, Benjamin Pisapia, David Ramakrishna, Rohan Wernicke, A Gabriella Knisely, Jonathan Pannullo, Susan Schwartz, Theodore Neurooncol Adv Supplement Abstracts BACKGROUND: Data regarding the efficacy of adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for resected brain metastases (BM) is often limited to patients completing SRS within a specified timeframe. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis to determine local recurrence (LR) for all BM patients referred for SRS. METHODS: We retrospectively identified resected BM patients referred for SRS between 2012 and 2018. Patients were divided based on delay to SRS into four categories: 1) ≤4 weeks, 2) >4–8 weeks, 3) >8 weeks, and 4) never received. We investigated the relationship between delay to SRS and LR, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and overall survival, as well as the predictors of and reason for delays. RESULTS: In our cohort of 159 patients, median age was 64.0 years, 56.5% patients were female, median tumor diameter was 2.9 cm, and gross total resection was achieved in 83.0%. On intention-to-treat analysis, LR was 22.6%. Delays to SRS correlated with LR: 2.3% with SRS ≤4 weeks postoperatively, 14.5% with SRS at >4–8 weeks (p=0.03), 48.5% with SRS at >8 weeks (p<0.001). No LR difference was observed with SRS delayed by >8 weeks, vs. never completed, 48.5% vs. 50.0% (p=0.91). 53 (33.3%) patients comprised these latter two categories. A similar relationship emerged between delay to SRS and LRFS (p<0.01). Non-small cell lung cancer pathology (p=0.04) and earlier year of treatment (p<0.01) were predictive of delays. Common reasons for delays included logistics, management of systemic disease, complications, or comorbidities. CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients referred for SRS never receive it, or are treated with a delay >8 weeks, conferring equivalent LR risk. Accordingly, the actual efficacy of adjuvant SRS may need reassessment. Reasons for delays and mechanisms for reducing them are discussed. For patients likely to experience significant delays, other techniques, such as preoperative SRS or intraoperative brachytherapy, may be considered. Oxford University Press 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7401377/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa073.033 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Supplement Abstracts O’Brien, Diana Roth Kaye, Sydney Poppas, Phillip Mahase, Sean An, Anjile Christos, Paul Liechty, Benjamin Pisapia, David Ramakrishna, Rohan Wernicke, A Gabriella Knisely, Jonathan Pannullo, Susan Schwartz, Theodore 45. DELAY OR FAILURE TO ADMINISTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY TO THE CAVITY AFTER SURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES. AN INTENTION-TO-TREAT ANALYSIS |
title | 45. DELAY OR FAILURE TO ADMINISTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY TO THE CAVITY AFTER SURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES. AN INTENTION-TO-TREAT ANALYSIS |
title_full | 45. DELAY OR FAILURE TO ADMINISTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY TO THE CAVITY AFTER SURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES. AN INTENTION-TO-TREAT ANALYSIS |
title_fullStr | 45. DELAY OR FAILURE TO ADMINISTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY TO THE CAVITY AFTER SURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES. AN INTENTION-TO-TREAT ANALYSIS |
title_full_unstemmed | 45. DELAY OR FAILURE TO ADMINISTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY TO THE CAVITY AFTER SURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES. AN INTENTION-TO-TREAT ANALYSIS |
title_short | 45. DELAY OR FAILURE TO ADMINISTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY TO THE CAVITY AFTER SURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES. AN INTENTION-TO-TREAT ANALYSIS |
title_sort | 45. delay or failure to administer stereotactic radiosurgery to the cavity after surgery for brain metastases. an intention-to-treat analysis |
topic | Supplement Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401377/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa073.033 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT obriendianaroth 45delayorfailuretoadministerstereotacticradiosurgerytothecavityaftersurgeryforbrainmetastasesanintentiontotreatanalysis AT kayesydney 45delayorfailuretoadministerstereotacticradiosurgerytothecavityaftersurgeryforbrainmetastasesanintentiontotreatanalysis AT poppasphillip 45delayorfailuretoadministerstereotacticradiosurgerytothecavityaftersurgeryforbrainmetastasesanintentiontotreatanalysis AT mahasesean 45delayorfailuretoadministerstereotacticradiosurgerytothecavityaftersurgeryforbrainmetastasesanintentiontotreatanalysis AT ananjile 45delayorfailuretoadministerstereotacticradiosurgerytothecavityaftersurgeryforbrainmetastasesanintentiontotreatanalysis AT christospaul 45delayorfailuretoadministerstereotacticradiosurgerytothecavityaftersurgeryforbrainmetastasesanintentiontotreatanalysis AT liechtybenjamin 45delayorfailuretoadministerstereotacticradiosurgerytothecavityaftersurgeryforbrainmetastasesanintentiontotreatanalysis AT pisapiadavid 45delayorfailuretoadministerstereotacticradiosurgerytothecavityaftersurgeryforbrainmetastasesanintentiontotreatanalysis AT ramakrishnarohan 45delayorfailuretoadministerstereotacticradiosurgerytothecavityaftersurgeryforbrainmetastasesanintentiontotreatanalysis AT wernickeagabriella 45delayorfailuretoadministerstereotacticradiosurgerytothecavityaftersurgeryforbrainmetastasesanintentiontotreatanalysis AT kniselyjonathan 45delayorfailuretoadministerstereotacticradiosurgerytothecavityaftersurgeryforbrainmetastasesanintentiontotreatanalysis AT pannullosusan 45delayorfailuretoadministerstereotacticradiosurgerytothecavityaftersurgeryforbrainmetastasesanintentiontotreatanalysis AT schwartztheodore 45delayorfailuretoadministerstereotacticradiosurgerytothecavityaftersurgeryforbrainmetastasesanintentiontotreatanalysis |