Cargando…

Improving Translation by Identifying Evidence for More Human-Relevant Preclinical Strategies

SIMPLE SUMMARY: To develop new medical treatments, animal studies are used. However, there are questions and concerns about the usefulness of preclinical animal research. These so-called translational success rates vary between 0 and 100% and no clear relationship has been established with possible...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel, Leenaars, Cathalijn, Beumer, Wouter, Coenen-de Roo, Tineke, Stafleu, Frans, Meijboom, Franck L. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10071170
_version_ 1783566585212960768
author Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel
Leenaars, Cathalijn
Beumer, Wouter
Coenen-de Roo, Tineke
Stafleu, Frans
Meijboom, Franck L. B.
author_facet Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel
Leenaars, Cathalijn
Beumer, Wouter
Coenen-de Roo, Tineke
Stafleu, Frans
Meijboom, Franck L. B.
author_sort Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: To develop new medical treatments, animal studies are used. However, there are questions and concerns about the usefulness of preclinical animal research. These so-called translational success rates vary between 0 and 100% and no clear relationship has been established with possible predictive factors such as animal species or field of research. This paper presents the main results of a conference that was organised in November 2019 as part of a research project that focuses on ways to improve predictability of translation from preclinical research to clinical studies. Based on the conference results and the findings from the research project, we define four points of attention that are crucial in the search for improved translational success rates: (a) optimising the methods and design of studies; (b) incorporation of the complexity of the human patient in research; (c) start with the patient rather than existing animal models as the gold standard; and (d) more and better collaboration within the chain from funding to pharmacy. We conclude that this requires improved organization and use of procedures, as well as a change of attitude and culture in research. ABSTRACT: Preclinical animal studies are performed to analyse the safety and efficacy of new treatments, with the aim to protect humans. However, there are questions and concerns about the quality and usefulness of preclinical animal research. Translational success rates vary between 0 and 100%, and no clear relationship has been found with possible predictive factors such as animal species or field of research. Therefore, it is not yet possible to indicate what factors predict successful translation. Translational strategies were therefore discussed at an international conference held in the Netherlands in November 2019, aiming to develop practical guidelines for more robust animal-to-human translation. The conference was organised during the course of a research project funded by the Dutch Research Council (313-99-310), addressing possible solutions for the low translational values that had been published for a multitude of animal studies in human health care. This article provides an overview of the project and the conference discussions. Based on the conference results and the findings from the research project, we define four points of attention that are crucial in the search for improved translational success rates: (a) optimising the methods and design of studies; (b) incorporation of the complexity of the human patient in research; (c) start with the patient rather than existing animal models as the gold standard; and (d) more and better collaboration within the chain from funding to pharmacy. We conclude that this requires improved organization and use of procedures, as well as a change of attitude and culture in research, including a consideration of the translational value of animal-free innovations and human-relevant science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7401546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74015462020-08-07 Improving Translation by Identifying Evidence for More Human-Relevant Preclinical Strategies Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel Leenaars, Cathalijn Beumer, Wouter Coenen-de Roo, Tineke Stafleu, Frans Meijboom, Franck L. B. Animals (Basel) Conference Report SIMPLE SUMMARY: To develop new medical treatments, animal studies are used. However, there are questions and concerns about the usefulness of preclinical animal research. These so-called translational success rates vary between 0 and 100% and no clear relationship has been established with possible predictive factors such as animal species or field of research. This paper presents the main results of a conference that was organised in November 2019 as part of a research project that focuses on ways to improve predictability of translation from preclinical research to clinical studies. Based on the conference results and the findings from the research project, we define four points of attention that are crucial in the search for improved translational success rates: (a) optimising the methods and design of studies; (b) incorporation of the complexity of the human patient in research; (c) start with the patient rather than existing animal models as the gold standard; and (d) more and better collaboration within the chain from funding to pharmacy. We conclude that this requires improved organization and use of procedures, as well as a change of attitude and culture in research. ABSTRACT: Preclinical animal studies are performed to analyse the safety and efficacy of new treatments, with the aim to protect humans. However, there are questions and concerns about the quality and usefulness of preclinical animal research. Translational success rates vary between 0 and 100%, and no clear relationship has been found with possible predictive factors such as animal species or field of research. Therefore, it is not yet possible to indicate what factors predict successful translation. Translational strategies were therefore discussed at an international conference held in the Netherlands in November 2019, aiming to develop practical guidelines for more robust animal-to-human translation. The conference was organised during the course of a research project funded by the Dutch Research Council (313-99-310), addressing possible solutions for the low translational values that had been published for a multitude of animal studies in human health care. This article provides an overview of the project and the conference discussions. Based on the conference results and the findings from the research project, we define four points of attention that are crucial in the search for improved translational success rates: (a) optimising the methods and design of studies; (b) incorporation of the complexity of the human patient in research; (c) start with the patient rather than existing animal models as the gold standard; and (d) more and better collaboration within the chain from funding to pharmacy. We conclude that this requires improved organization and use of procedures, as well as a change of attitude and culture in research, including a consideration of the translational value of animal-free innovations and human-relevant science. MDPI 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7401546/ /pubmed/32664195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10071170 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Conference Report
Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel
Leenaars, Cathalijn
Beumer, Wouter
Coenen-de Roo, Tineke
Stafleu, Frans
Meijboom, Franck L. B.
Improving Translation by Identifying Evidence for More Human-Relevant Preclinical Strategies
title Improving Translation by Identifying Evidence for More Human-Relevant Preclinical Strategies
title_full Improving Translation by Identifying Evidence for More Human-Relevant Preclinical Strategies
title_fullStr Improving Translation by Identifying Evidence for More Human-Relevant Preclinical Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Improving Translation by Identifying Evidence for More Human-Relevant Preclinical Strategies
title_short Improving Translation by Identifying Evidence for More Human-Relevant Preclinical Strategies
title_sort improving translation by identifying evidence for more human-relevant preclinical strategies
topic Conference Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10071170
work_keys_str_mv AT ritskeshoitingamerel improvingtranslationbyidentifyingevidenceformorehumanrelevantpreclinicalstrategies
AT leenaarscathalijn improvingtranslationbyidentifyingevidenceformorehumanrelevantpreclinicalstrategies
AT beumerwouter improvingtranslationbyidentifyingevidenceformorehumanrelevantpreclinicalstrategies
AT coenenderootineke improvingtranslationbyidentifyingevidenceformorehumanrelevantpreclinicalstrategies
AT stafleufrans improvingtranslationbyidentifyingevidenceformorehumanrelevantpreclinicalstrategies
AT meijboomfrancklb improvingtranslationbyidentifyingevidenceformorehumanrelevantpreclinicalstrategies