Cargando…
Influence of the Fermented Feed and Vaccination and Their Interaction on Parameters of Large White/Norwegian Landrace Piglets
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Farm animals are constantly exposed to pathogenic microorganisms, which can lead to bacterial, as well as secondary infections caused by viruses. For this reason, vaccination is used. However, many discussions have been published about the effectiveness of this prophylactic measure....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32679752 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10071201 |
_version_ | 1783566601407168512 |
---|---|
author | Vadopalas, Laurynas Badaras, Sarunas Ruzauskas, Modestas Lele, Vita Starkute, Vytaute Zavistanaviciute, Paulina Zokaityte, Egle Bartkevics, Vadims Klupsaite, Dovile Mozuriene, Erika Dauksiene, Agila Sidlauskiene, Sonata Gruzauskas, Romas Bartkiene, Elena |
author_facet | Vadopalas, Laurynas Badaras, Sarunas Ruzauskas, Modestas Lele, Vita Starkute, Vytaute Zavistanaviciute, Paulina Zokaityte, Egle Bartkevics, Vadims Klupsaite, Dovile Mozuriene, Erika Dauksiene, Agila Sidlauskiene, Sonata Gruzauskas, Romas Bartkiene, Elena |
author_sort | Vadopalas, Laurynas |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Farm animals are constantly exposed to pathogenic microorganisms, which can lead to bacterial, as well as secondary infections caused by viruses. For this reason, vaccination is used. However, many discussions have been published about the effectiveness of this prophylactic measure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of fermented feed on non-vaccinated (NV) and vaccinated with Circovac porcine circovirus type 2 vaccine piglets’ blood parameters, gut microbial composition, growth performance and ammonia emission. The 36-day experiment was conducted using 25-day-old Large White/Norwegian Landrace piglets, which were randomly divided into four groups each comprising 100 piglets (NV piglets fed with soya meal, vaccinated piglets fed with soya meal, NV piglets fed with fermented rapeseed meal and vaccinated piglets fed with fermented rapeseed meal). The results revealed that vaccination, as a separate factor, did not significantly influence piglets’ blood parameters. Finally, rapeseed meal fermented with the selected lactic acid bacteria strains can be used instead of expensive imported soya, because the fermented feed did not cause undesirable changes in piglets’ health and growth performance. Furthermore, the process is more sustainable. ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of fermented with a newly isolated lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains combination (Lactobacillus plantarum LUHS122, Lactobacillus casei LUHS210, Lactobacillus farraginis LUHS206, Pediococcus acidilactici LUHS29, Lactobacillus plantarum LUHS135 and Lactobacillus uvarum LUHS245) feed on non-vaccinated (NV) and vaccinated with Circovac porcine circovirus type 2 vaccine (QI09AA07, CEVA-PHYLAXIA Co. Ltd. Szállás u. 5. 1107 Budapest, Hungary) piglets’ blood parameters, gut microbial composition, growth performance and ammonia emission. The 36-day experiment was conducted using 25-day-old Large White/Norwegian Landrace (LW/NL) piglets, which were randomly divided into four groups with 100 piglets each: S(nonV)—non-vaccinated piglets fed with control group compound feed; S(V)—vaccinated piglets fed with control group compound feed; RF(nonV)—non-vaccinated piglets fed with fermented compound feed; RF(V)—vaccinated piglets fed with fermented compound feed. Samples from 10 animals per group were collected at the beginning and end of the experiment. Metagenomic analysis showed that fermentation had a positive impact on the Lactobacillus prevalence during the post-weaning period of pigs, and vaccination had no negative impact on microbial communities. Although a higher amount of Lactobacillus was detected in vaccinated, compared with non-vaccinated groups. At the end of experiment, there was a significantly higher LAB count in the faeces of both vaccinated compared to non-vaccinated groups (26.6% for S(V) and 17.2% for RF(V)), with the highest LAB count in the S(V) group. At the end of experiment, the S(V) faeces also had the highest total bacteria count (TBC). The RF(V) group had a 13.2% increase in total enterobacteria count (TEC) at the end of experiment, and the S(V) group showed a 31.2% higher yeast/mould (Y/M) count. There were no significant differences in the average daily gain (ADG) among the groups; however, there were significant differences in the feed conversion ratios (FCR) between several groups: S(V) vs. S(nonV) (11.5% lower in the S(V) group), RF(V) vs. RF(nonV) (10.2% lower in the RFnonV group) and S(V) vs. RF(V) (21.6% lower in the S(V) group). Furthermore, there was a significant, very strong positive correlation between FCR and TEC in piglets’ faeces (R = 0.919, p = 0.041). The lowest ammonia emission was in RF(V) group section (58.2, 23.8, and 47.33% lower compared with the S(nonV), S(V) and RF(nonV) groups, respectively). Notably, there was lower ammonia emission in vaccinated groups (45.2% lower in S(V) vs. S(nonV) and 47.33% lower in RF(V) vs. RF(nonV)). There was also a significant, very strong positive correlation between ammonia emission and Y/M count in piglets’ faeces at the end of the experiment (R = 0.974; p = 0.013). Vaccination as a separate factor did not significantly influence piglets’ blood parameters. Overall, by changing from an extruded soya to cheaper rapeseed meal and applying the fermentation model with the selected LAB combination, it is possible to feed piglets without any undesirable changes in health and growth performance in a more sustainable manner. However, to evaluate the influence of vaccination and its interaction with other parameters (feed, piglets’ age, breed, etc.) on piglets’ parameters, additional studies should be performed and methods should be standardised to ensure the results may be compared. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7401620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74016202020-08-07 Influence of the Fermented Feed and Vaccination and Their Interaction on Parameters of Large White/Norwegian Landrace Piglets Vadopalas, Laurynas Badaras, Sarunas Ruzauskas, Modestas Lele, Vita Starkute, Vytaute Zavistanaviciute, Paulina Zokaityte, Egle Bartkevics, Vadims Klupsaite, Dovile Mozuriene, Erika Dauksiene, Agila Sidlauskiene, Sonata Gruzauskas, Romas Bartkiene, Elena Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Farm animals are constantly exposed to pathogenic microorganisms, which can lead to bacterial, as well as secondary infections caused by viruses. For this reason, vaccination is used. However, many discussions have been published about the effectiveness of this prophylactic measure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of fermented feed on non-vaccinated (NV) and vaccinated with Circovac porcine circovirus type 2 vaccine piglets’ blood parameters, gut microbial composition, growth performance and ammonia emission. The 36-day experiment was conducted using 25-day-old Large White/Norwegian Landrace piglets, which were randomly divided into four groups each comprising 100 piglets (NV piglets fed with soya meal, vaccinated piglets fed with soya meal, NV piglets fed with fermented rapeseed meal and vaccinated piglets fed with fermented rapeseed meal). The results revealed that vaccination, as a separate factor, did not significantly influence piglets’ blood parameters. Finally, rapeseed meal fermented with the selected lactic acid bacteria strains can be used instead of expensive imported soya, because the fermented feed did not cause undesirable changes in piglets’ health and growth performance. Furthermore, the process is more sustainable. ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of fermented with a newly isolated lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains combination (Lactobacillus plantarum LUHS122, Lactobacillus casei LUHS210, Lactobacillus farraginis LUHS206, Pediococcus acidilactici LUHS29, Lactobacillus plantarum LUHS135 and Lactobacillus uvarum LUHS245) feed on non-vaccinated (NV) and vaccinated with Circovac porcine circovirus type 2 vaccine (QI09AA07, CEVA-PHYLAXIA Co. Ltd. Szállás u. 5. 1107 Budapest, Hungary) piglets’ blood parameters, gut microbial composition, growth performance and ammonia emission. The 36-day experiment was conducted using 25-day-old Large White/Norwegian Landrace (LW/NL) piglets, which were randomly divided into four groups with 100 piglets each: S(nonV)—non-vaccinated piglets fed with control group compound feed; S(V)—vaccinated piglets fed with control group compound feed; RF(nonV)—non-vaccinated piglets fed with fermented compound feed; RF(V)—vaccinated piglets fed with fermented compound feed. Samples from 10 animals per group were collected at the beginning and end of the experiment. Metagenomic analysis showed that fermentation had a positive impact on the Lactobacillus prevalence during the post-weaning period of pigs, and vaccination had no negative impact on microbial communities. Although a higher amount of Lactobacillus was detected in vaccinated, compared with non-vaccinated groups. At the end of experiment, there was a significantly higher LAB count in the faeces of both vaccinated compared to non-vaccinated groups (26.6% for S(V) and 17.2% for RF(V)), with the highest LAB count in the S(V) group. At the end of experiment, the S(V) faeces also had the highest total bacteria count (TBC). The RF(V) group had a 13.2% increase in total enterobacteria count (TEC) at the end of experiment, and the S(V) group showed a 31.2% higher yeast/mould (Y/M) count. There were no significant differences in the average daily gain (ADG) among the groups; however, there were significant differences in the feed conversion ratios (FCR) between several groups: S(V) vs. S(nonV) (11.5% lower in the S(V) group), RF(V) vs. RF(nonV) (10.2% lower in the RFnonV group) and S(V) vs. RF(V) (21.6% lower in the S(V) group). Furthermore, there was a significant, very strong positive correlation between FCR and TEC in piglets’ faeces (R = 0.919, p = 0.041). The lowest ammonia emission was in RF(V) group section (58.2, 23.8, and 47.33% lower compared with the S(nonV), S(V) and RF(nonV) groups, respectively). Notably, there was lower ammonia emission in vaccinated groups (45.2% lower in S(V) vs. S(nonV) and 47.33% lower in RF(V) vs. RF(nonV)). There was also a significant, very strong positive correlation between ammonia emission and Y/M count in piglets’ faeces at the end of the experiment (R = 0.974; p = 0.013). Vaccination as a separate factor did not significantly influence piglets’ blood parameters. Overall, by changing from an extruded soya to cheaper rapeseed meal and applying the fermentation model with the selected LAB combination, it is possible to feed piglets without any undesirable changes in health and growth performance in a more sustainable manner. However, to evaluate the influence of vaccination and its interaction with other parameters (feed, piglets’ age, breed, etc.) on piglets’ parameters, additional studies should be performed and methods should be standardised to ensure the results may be compared. MDPI 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7401620/ /pubmed/32679752 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10071201 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Vadopalas, Laurynas Badaras, Sarunas Ruzauskas, Modestas Lele, Vita Starkute, Vytaute Zavistanaviciute, Paulina Zokaityte, Egle Bartkevics, Vadims Klupsaite, Dovile Mozuriene, Erika Dauksiene, Agila Sidlauskiene, Sonata Gruzauskas, Romas Bartkiene, Elena Influence of the Fermented Feed and Vaccination and Their Interaction on Parameters of Large White/Norwegian Landrace Piglets |
title | Influence of the Fermented Feed and Vaccination and Their Interaction on Parameters of Large White/Norwegian Landrace Piglets |
title_full | Influence of the Fermented Feed and Vaccination and Their Interaction on Parameters of Large White/Norwegian Landrace Piglets |
title_fullStr | Influence of the Fermented Feed and Vaccination and Their Interaction on Parameters of Large White/Norwegian Landrace Piglets |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of the Fermented Feed and Vaccination and Their Interaction on Parameters of Large White/Norwegian Landrace Piglets |
title_short | Influence of the Fermented Feed and Vaccination and Their Interaction on Parameters of Large White/Norwegian Landrace Piglets |
title_sort | influence of the fermented feed and vaccination and their interaction on parameters of large white/norwegian landrace piglets |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32679752 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10071201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vadopalaslaurynas influenceofthefermentedfeedandvaccinationandtheirinteractiononparametersoflargewhitenorwegianlandracepiglets AT badarassarunas influenceofthefermentedfeedandvaccinationandtheirinteractiononparametersoflargewhitenorwegianlandracepiglets AT ruzauskasmodestas influenceofthefermentedfeedandvaccinationandtheirinteractiononparametersoflargewhitenorwegianlandracepiglets AT lelevita influenceofthefermentedfeedandvaccinationandtheirinteractiononparametersoflargewhitenorwegianlandracepiglets AT starkutevytaute influenceofthefermentedfeedandvaccinationandtheirinteractiononparametersoflargewhitenorwegianlandracepiglets AT zavistanaviciutepaulina influenceofthefermentedfeedandvaccinationandtheirinteractiononparametersoflargewhitenorwegianlandracepiglets AT zokaityteegle influenceofthefermentedfeedandvaccinationandtheirinteractiononparametersoflargewhitenorwegianlandracepiglets AT bartkevicsvadims influenceofthefermentedfeedandvaccinationandtheirinteractiononparametersoflargewhitenorwegianlandracepiglets AT klupsaitedovile influenceofthefermentedfeedandvaccinationandtheirinteractiononparametersoflargewhitenorwegianlandracepiglets AT mozurieneerika influenceofthefermentedfeedandvaccinationandtheirinteractiononparametersoflargewhitenorwegianlandracepiglets AT dauksieneagila influenceofthefermentedfeedandvaccinationandtheirinteractiononparametersoflargewhitenorwegianlandracepiglets AT sidlauskienesonata influenceofthefermentedfeedandvaccinationandtheirinteractiononparametersoflargewhitenorwegianlandracepiglets AT gruzauskasromas influenceofthefermentedfeedandvaccinationandtheirinteractiononparametersoflargewhitenorwegianlandracepiglets AT bartkieneelena influenceofthefermentedfeedandvaccinationandtheirinteractiononparametersoflargewhitenorwegianlandracepiglets |