Cargando…
Behavioral Methods for Severity Assessment
SIMPLE SUMMARY: In 2017, 9.4 million animals were used for research and testing in the European Union. Animal testing always entails the potential for harm caused to the animals. In order to minimize animal suffering, it is of ethical and scientific interest to have a research-based severity assessm...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32635341 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10071136 |
_version_ | 1783566604202672128 |
---|---|
author | Kahnau, Pia Habedank, Anne Diederich, Kai Lewejohann, Lars |
author_facet | Kahnau, Pia Habedank, Anne Diederich, Kai Lewejohann, Lars |
author_sort | Kahnau, Pia |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: In 2017, 9.4 million animals were used for research and testing in the European Union. Animal testing always entails the potential for harm caused to the animals. In order to minimize animal suffering, it is of ethical and scientific interest to have a research-based severity assessment of animal experiments. In the past, many methods have been developed to investigate animal suffering. Initially, the focus was on physiological parameters, such as body weight or glucocorticoids as an indicator of stress. In addition, the animals’ behavior has come more into focus and has been included as an indicator of severity. However, in order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of animal suffering, an animal’s individual perspective should also be taken into account. Preference tests might be used, for example, to “ask” animals what they prefer, and providing such goods in turn allows, among other things, to improve housing conditions. In this review, different methods are introduced, which can be used to investigate and evaluate animal suffering and well-being with a special focus on animal-centric strategies. ABSTRACT: It has become mandatory for the application for allowance of animal experimentation to rate the severity of the experimental procedures. In order to minimize suffering related to animal experimentation it is therefore crucial to develop appropriate methods for the assessment of animal suffering. Physiological parameters such as hormones or body weight are used to assess stress in laboratory animals. However, such physiological parameters alone are often difficult to interpret and leave a wide scope for interpretation. More recently, behavior, feelings and emotions have come increasingly into the focus of welfare research. Tests like preference tests or cognitive bias tests give insight on how animals evaluate certain situations or objects, how they feel and what their emotional state is. These methods should be combined in order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the well-being of laboratory animals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7401632 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74016322020-08-07 Behavioral Methods for Severity Assessment Kahnau, Pia Habedank, Anne Diederich, Kai Lewejohann, Lars Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: In 2017, 9.4 million animals were used for research and testing in the European Union. Animal testing always entails the potential for harm caused to the animals. In order to minimize animal suffering, it is of ethical and scientific interest to have a research-based severity assessment of animal experiments. In the past, many methods have been developed to investigate animal suffering. Initially, the focus was on physiological parameters, such as body weight or glucocorticoids as an indicator of stress. In addition, the animals’ behavior has come more into focus and has been included as an indicator of severity. However, in order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of animal suffering, an animal’s individual perspective should also be taken into account. Preference tests might be used, for example, to “ask” animals what they prefer, and providing such goods in turn allows, among other things, to improve housing conditions. In this review, different methods are introduced, which can be used to investigate and evaluate animal suffering and well-being with a special focus on animal-centric strategies. ABSTRACT: It has become mandatory for the application for allowance of animal experimentation to rate the severity of the experimental procedures. In order to minimize suffering related to animal experimentation it is therefore crucial to develop appropriate methods for the assessment of animal suffering. Physiological parameters such as hormones or body weight are used to assess stress in laboratory animals. However, such physiological parameters alone are often difficult to interpret and leave a wide scope for interpretation. More recently, behavior, feelings and emotions have come increasingly into the focus of welfare research. Tests like preference tests or cognitive bias tests give insight on how animals evaluate certain situations or objects, how they feel and what their emotional state is. These methods should be combined in order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the well-being of laboratory animals. MDPI 2020-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7401632/ /pubmed/32635341 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10071136 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Kahnau, Pia Habedank, Anne Diederich, Kai Lewejohann, Lars Behavioral Methods for Severity Assessment |
title | Behavioral Methods for Severity Assessment |
title_full | Behavioral Methods for Severity Assessment |
title_fullStr | Behavioral Methods for Severity Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Behavioral Methods for Severity Assessment |
title_short | Behavioral Methods for Severity Assessment |
title_sort | behavioral methods for severity assessment |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32635341 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10071136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kahnaupia behavioralmethodsforseverityassessment AT habedankanne behavioralmethodsforseverityassessment AT diederichkai behavioralmethodsforseverityassessment AT lewejohannlars behavioralmethodsforseverityassessment |