Cargando…
Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma
BACKGROUND: The optimal sequence of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and assessment of response in patients with brain metastases from melanoma remain challenging. METHODS: We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 patients with melanoma, including 26 pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32747372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000763 |
_version_ | 1783566673359405056 |
---|---|
author | Le Rhun, Emilie Wolpert, Fabian Fialek, Maud Devos, Patrick Andratschke, Nicolaus Reyns, Nicolas Regli, Luca Dummer, Reinhard Mortier, Laurent Weller, Michael |
author_facet | Le Rhun, Emilie Wolpert, Fabian Fialek, Maud Devos, Patrick Andratschke, Nicolaus Reyns, Nicolas Regli, Luca Dummer, Reinhard Mortier, Laurent Weller, Michael |
author_sort | Le Rhun, Emilie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal sequence of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and assessment of response in patients with brain metastases from melanoma remain challenging. METHODS: We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 patients with melanoma, including 26 patients with BRAF-mutant tumours, with newly diagnosed brain metastases treated with ICI alone (n=10, group 1), SRT alone or in combination with other systemic therapies (n=20, group 2) or ICI plus SRT (n=32, group 3). Response was assessed retrospectively using response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) V.1.1, response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) and immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. MRI follow-up from 43 patients was available for central review. RESULTS: Patients treated with ICI alone showed no objective responses and had worse outcome than patients treated with SRT without or with ICI. RECIST, RANO and iRANO criteria were concordant for complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). RANO called progression earlier than RECIST for clinical deterioration without MRI progression in some patients. Progression was called later when using iRANO criteria because of the need for a confirmatory scan. Pseudoprogression was documented in seven patients: three patients in group 2 and four patients in group 3. Radionecrosis was documented in seven patients: two patients in group 2 and five patients in group 3. Regression of non-irradiated lesions was seen neither in two patients treated with SRT alone nor in five patients treated with SRT plus ICI, providing no evidence for rare abscopal effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudoprogression is uncommon with ICI alone, suggesting that growing lesions in such patients should trigger an intervention. Pseudoprogression rates were similar after SRT alone or SRT in combination with ICI. Abscopal effects are rare or do not exist. Response assessment criteria should be considered carefully when designing clinical studies for patients with brain metastases who receive SRT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7401999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74019992020-08-17 Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma Le Rhun, Emilie Wolpert, Fabian Fialek, Maud Devos, Patrick Andratschke, Nicolaus Reyns, Nicolas Regli, Luca Dummer, Reinhard Mortier, Laurent Weller, Michael ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: The optimal sequence of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and assessment of response in patients with brain metastases from melanoma remain challenging. METHODS: We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 patients with melanoma, including 26 patients with BRAF-mutant tumours, with newly diagnosed brain metastases treated with ICI alone (n=10, group 1), SRT alone or in combination with other systemic therapies (n=20, group 2) or ICI plus SRT (n=32, group 3). Response was assessed retrospectively using response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) V.1.1, response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) and immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. MRI follow-up from 43 patients was available for central review. RESULTS: Patients treated with ICI alone showed no objective responses and had worse outcome than patients treated with SRT without or with ICI. RECIST, RANO and iRANO criteria were concordant for complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). RANO called progression earlier than RECIST for clinical deterioration without MRI progression in some patients. Progression was called later when using iRANO criteria because of the need for a confirmatory scan. Pseudoprogression was documented in seven patients: three patients in group 2 and four patients in group 3. Radionecrosis was documented in seven patients: two patients in group 2 and five patients in group 3. Regression of non-irradiated lesions was seen neither in two patients treated with SRT alone nor in five patients treated with SRT plus ICI, providing no evidence for rare abscopal effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudoprogression is uncommon with ICI alone, suggesting that growing lesions in such patients should trigger an intervention. Pseudoprogression rates were similar after SRT alone or SRT in combination with ICI. Abscopal effects are rare or do not exist. Response assessment criteria should be considered carefully when designing clinical studies for patients with brain metastases who receive SRT. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7401999/ /pubmed/32747372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000763 Text en © Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, any changes made are indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Le Rhun, Emilie Wolpert, Fabian Fialek, Maud Devos, Patrick Andratschke, Nicolaus Reyns, Nicolas Regli, Luca Dummer, Reinhard Mortier, Laurent Weller, Michael Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma |
title | Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma |
title_full | Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma |
title_fullStr | Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma |
title_short | Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma |
title_sort | response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32747372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000763 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lerhunemilie responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma AT wolpertfabian responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma AT fialekmaud responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma AT devospatrick responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma AT andratschkenicolaus responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma AT reynsnicolas responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma AT regliluca responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma AT dummerreinhard responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma AT mortierlaurent responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma AT wellermichael responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma |