Cargando…

Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND: The optimal sequence of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and assessment of response in patients with brain metastases from melanoma remain challenging. METHODS: We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 patients with melanoma, including 26 pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Rhun, Emilie, Wolpert, Fabian, Fialek, Maud, Devos, Patrick, Andratschke, Nicolaus, Reyns, Nicolas, Regli, Luca, Dummer, Reinhard, Mortier, Laurent, Weller, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32747372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000763
_version_ 1783566673359405056
author Le Rhun, Emilie
Wolpert, Fabian
Fialek, Maud
Devos, Patrick
Andratschke, Nicolaus
Reyns, Nicolas
Regli, Luca
Dummer, Reinhard
Mortier, Laurent
Weller, Michael
author_facet Le Rhun, Emilie
Wolpert, Fabian
Fialek, Maud
Devos, Patrick
Andratschke, Nicolaus
Reyns, Nicolas
Regli, Luca
Dummer, Reinhard
Mortier, Laurent
Weller, Michael
author_sort Le Rhun, Emilie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal sequence of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and assessment of response in patients with brain metastases from melanoma remain challenging. METHODS: We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 patients with melanoma, including 26 patients with BRAF-mutant tumours, with newly diagnosed brain metastases treated with ICI alone (n=10, group 1), SRT alone or in combination with other systemic therapies (n=20, group 2) or ICI plus SRT (n=32, group 3). Response was assessed retrospectively using response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) V.1.1, response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) and immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. MRI follow-up from 43 patients was available for central review. RESULTS: Patients treated with ICI alone showed no objective responses and had worse outcome than patients treated with SRT without or with ICI. RECIST, RANO and iRANO criteria were concordant for complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). RANO called progression earlier than RECIST for clinical deterioration without MRI progression in some patients. Progression was called later when using iRANO criteria because of the need for a confirmatory scan. Pseudoprogression was documented in seven patients: three patients in group 2 and four patients in group 3. Radionecrosis was documented in seven patients: two patients in group 2 and five patients in group 3. Regression of non-irradiated lesions was seen neither in two patients treated with SRT alone nor in five patients treated with SRT plus ICI, providing no evidence for rare abscopal effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudoprogression is uncommon with ICI alone, suggesting that growing lesions in such patients should trigger an intervention. Pseudoprogression rates were similar after SRT alone or SRT in combination with ICI. Abscopal effects are rare or do not exist. Response assessment criteria should be considered carefully when designing clinical studies for patients with brain metastases who receive SRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7401999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74019992020-08-17 Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma Le Rhun, Emilie Wolpert, Fabian Fialek, Maud Devos, Patrick Andratschke, Nicolaus Reyns, Nicolas Regli, Luca Dummer, Reinhard Mortier, Laurent Weller, Michael ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: The optimal sequence of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and assessment of response in patients with brain metastases from melanoma remain challenging. METHODS: We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 patients with melanoma, including 26 patients with BRAF-mutant tumours, with newly diagnosed brain metastases treated with ICI alone (n=10, group 1), SRT alone or in combination with other systemic therapies (n=20, group 2) or ICI plus SRT (n=32, group 3). Response was assessed retrospectively using response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) V.1.1, response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) and immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. MRI follow-up from 43 patients was available for central review. RESULTS: Patients treated with ICI alone showed no objective responses and had worse outcome than patients treated with SRT without or with ICI. RECIST, RANO and iRANO criteria were concordant for complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). RANO called progression earlier than RECIST for clinical deterioration without MRI progression in some patients. Progression was called later when using iRANO criteria because of the need for a confirmatory scan. Pseudoprogression was documented in seven patients: three patients in group 2 and four patients in group 3. Radionecrosis was documented in seven patients: two patients in group 2 and five patients in group 3. Regression of non-irradiated lesions was seen neither in two patients treated with SRT alone nor in five patients treated with SRT plus ICI, providing no evidence for rare abscopal effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudoprogression is uncommon with ICI alone, suggesting that growing lesions in such patients should trigger an intervention. Pseudoprogression rates were similar after SRT alone or SRT in combination with ICI. Abscopal effects are rare or do not exist. Response assessment criteria should be considered carefully when designing clinical studies for patients with brain metastases who receive SRT. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7401999/ /pubmed/32747372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000763 Text en © Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, any changes made are indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Le Rhun, Emilie
Wolpert, Fabian
Fialek, Maud
Devos, Patrick
Andratschke, Nicolaus
Reyns, Nicolas
Regli, Luca
Dummer, Reinhard
Mortier, Laurent
Weller, Michael
Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma
title Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma
title_full Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma
title_fullStr Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma
title_short Response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma
title_sort response assessment and outcome of combining immunotherapy and radiosurgery for brain metastasis from malignant melanoma
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32747372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000763
work_keys_str_mv AT lerhunemilie responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma
AT wolpertfabian responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma
AT fialekmaud responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma
AT devospatrick responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma
AT andratschkenicolaus responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma
AT reynsnicolas responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma
AT regliluca responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma
AT dummerreinhard responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma
AT mortierlaurent responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma
AT wellermichael responseassessmentandoutcomeofcombiningimmunotherapyandradiosurgeryforbrainmetastasisfrommalignantmelanoma