Cargando…
Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging
PURPOSE: The gradient‐echo MR signal in brain white matter depends on the orientation of the fibers with respect to the external magnetic field. To map microstructure‐specific magnetic susceptibility in orientationally heterogeneous material, it is thus imperative to regress out unwanted orientation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32378746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28303 |
_version_ | 1783566676420198400 |
---|---|
author | Kaden, Enrico Gyori, Noemi G. Rudrapatna, S. Umesh Barskaya, Irina Y. Dragonu, Iulius Does, Mark D. Jones, Derek K. Clark, Chris A. Alexander, Daniel C. |
author_facet | Kaden, Enrico Gyori, Noemi G. Rudrapatna, S. Umesh Barskaya, Irina Y. Dragonu, Iulius Does, Mark D. Jones, Derek K. Clark, Chris A. Alexander, Daniel C. |
author_sort | Kaden, Enrico |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The gradient‐echo MR signal in brain white matter depends on the orientation of the fibers with respect to the external magnetic field. To map microstructure‐specific magnetic susceptibility in orientationally heterogeneous material, it is thus imperative to regress out unwanted orientation effects. METHODS: This work introduces a novel framework, referred to as microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging, that disentangles the 2 principal effects conflated in gradient‐echo measurements, (a) the susceptibility properties of tissue microenvironments, especially the myelin microstructure, and (b) the axon orientation distribution relative to the magnetic field. Specifically, we utilize information about the orientational tissue structure inferred from diffusion MRI data to factor out the [Formula: see text] ‐direction dependence of the frequency difference signal. RESULTS: A human pilot study at 3 T demonstrates proxy maps of microscopic susceptibility anisotropy unconfounded by fiber crossings and orientation dispersion as well as magnetic field direction. The developed technique requires only a dual‐echo gradient‐echo scan acquired at 1 or 2 head orientations with respect to the magnetic field and a 2‐shell diffusion protocol achievable on standard scanners within practical scan times. CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative recovery of microscopic susceptibility features in the presence of orientational heterogeneity potentially improves the assessment of microstructural tissue integrity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7402021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74020212020-08-06 Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging Kaden, Enrico Gyori, Noemi G. Rudrapatna, S. Umesh Barskaya, Irina Y. Dragonu, Iulius Does, Mark D. Jones, Derek K. Clark, Chris A. Alexander, Daniel C. Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research PURPOSE: The gradient‐echo MR signal in brain white matter depends on the orientation of the fibers with respect to the external magnetic field. To map microstructure‐specific magnetic susceptibility in orientationally heterogeneous material, it is thus imperative to regress out unwanted orientation effects. METHODS: This work introduces a novel framework, referred to as microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging, that disentangles the 2 principal effects conflated in gradient‐echo measurements, (a) the susceptibility properties of tissue microenvironments, especially the myelin microstructure, and (b) the axon orientation distribution relative to the magnetic field. Specifically, we utilize information about the orientational tissue structure inferred from diffusion MRI data to factor out the [Formula: see text] ‐direction dependence of the frequency difference signal. RESULTS: A human pilot study at 3 T demonstrates proxy maps of microscopic susceptibility anisotropy unconfounded by fiber crossings and orientation dispersion as well as magnetic field direction. The developed technique requires only a dual‐echo gradient‐echo scan acquired at 1 or 2 head orientations with respect to the magnetic field and a 2‐shell diffusion protocol achievable on standard scanners within practical scan times. CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative recovery of microscopic susceptibility features in the presence of orientational heterogeneity potentially improves the assessment of microstructural tissue integrity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-07 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7402021/ /pubmed/32378746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28303 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full Papers—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research Kaden, Enrico Gyori, Noemi G. Rudrapatna, S. Umesh Barskaya, Irina Y. Dragonu, Iulius Does, Mark D. Jones, Derek K. Clark, Chris A. Alexander, Daniel C. Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging |
title | Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging |
title_full | Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging |
title_fullStr | Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging |
title_short | Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging |
title_sort | microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging |
topic | Full Papers—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32378746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28303 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kadenenrico microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging AT gyorinoemig microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging AT rudrapatnasumesh microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging AT barskayairinay microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging AT dragonuiulius microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging AT doesmarkd microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging AT jonesderekk microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging AT clarkchrisa microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging AT alexanderdanielc microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging |