Cargando…

Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging

PURPOSE: The gradient‐echo MR signal in brain white matter depends on the orientation of the fibers with respect to the external magnetic field. To map microstructure‐specific magnetic susceptibility in orientationally heterogeneous material, it is thus imperative to regress out unwanted orientation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaden, Enrico, Gyori, Noemi G., Rudrapatna, S. Umesh, Barskaya, Irina Y., Dragonu, Iulius, Does, Mark D., Jones, Derek K., Clark, Chris A., Alexander, Daniel C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32378746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28303
_version_ 1783566676420198400
author Kaden, Enrico
Gyori, Noemi G.
Rudrapatna, S. Umesh
Barskaya, Irina Y.
Dragonu, Iulius
Does, Mark D.
Jones, Derek K.
Clark, Chris A.
Alexander, Daniel C.
author_facet Kaden, Enrico
Gyori, Noemi G.
Rudrapatna, S. Umesh
Barskaya, Irina Y.
Dragonu, Iulius
Does, Mark D.
Jones, Derek K.
Clark, Chris A.
Alexander, Daniel C.
author_sort Kaden, Enrico
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The gradient‐echo MR signal in brain white matter depends on the orientation of the fibers with respect to the external magnetic field. To map microstructure‐specific magnetic susceptibility in orientationally heterogeneous material, it is thus imperative to regress out unwanted orientation effects. METHODS: This work introduces a novel framework, referred to as microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging, that disentangles the 2 principal effects conflated in gradient‐echo measurements, (a) the susceptibility properties of tissue microenvironments, especially the myelin microstructure, and (b) the axon orientation distribution relative to the magnetic field. Specifically, we utilize information about the orientational tissue structure inferred from diffusion MRI data to factor out the [Formula: see text] ‐direction dependence of the frequency difference signal. RESULTS: A human pilot study at 3 T demonstrates proxy maps of microscopic susceptibility anisotropy unconfounded by fiber crossings and orientation dispersion as well as magnetic field direction. The developed technique requires only a dual‐echo gradient‐echo scan acquired at 1 or 2 head orientations with respect to the magnetic field and a 2‐shell diffusion protocol achievable on standard scanners within practical scan times. CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative recovery of microscopic susceptibility features in the presence of orientational heterogeneity potentially improves the assessment of microstructural tissue integrity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7402021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74020212020-08-06 Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging Kaden, Enrico Gyori, Noemi G. Rudrapatna, S. Umesh Barskaya, Irina Y. Dragonu, Iulius Does, Mark D. Jones, Derek K. Clark, Chris A. Alexander, Daniel C. Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research PURPOSE: The gradient‐echo MR signal in brain white matter depends on the orientation of the fibers with respect to the external magnetic field. To map microstructure‐specific magnetic susceptibility in orientationally heterogeneous material, it is thus imperative to regress out unwanted orientation effects. METHODS: This work introduces a novel framework, referred to as microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging, that disentangles the 2 principal effects conflated in gradient‐echo measurements, (a) the susceptibility properties of tissue microenvironments, especially the myelin microstructure, and (b) the axon orientation distribution relative to the magnetic field. Specifically, we utilize information about the orientational tissue structure inferred from diffusion MRI data to factor out the [Formula: see text] ‐direction dependence of the frequency difference signal. RESULTS: A human pilot study at 3 T demonstrates proxy maps of microscopic susceptibility anisotropy unconfounded by fiber crossings and orientation dispersion as well as magnetic field direction. The developed technique requires only a dual‐echo gradient‐echo scan acquired at 1 or 2 head orientations with respect to the magnetic field and a 2‐shell diffusion protocol achievable on standard scanners within practical scan times. CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative recovery of microscopic susceptibility features in the presence of orientational heterogeneity potentially improves the assessment of microstructural tissue integrity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-07 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7402021/ /pubmed/32378746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28303 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research
Kaden, Enrico
Gyori, Noemi G.
Rudrapatna, S. Umesh
Barskaya, Irina Y.
Dragonu, Iulius
Does, Mark D.
Jones, Derek K.
Clark, Chris A.
Alexander, Daniel C.
Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging
title Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging
title_full Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging
title_fullStr Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging
title_full_unstemmed Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging
title_short Microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging
title_sort microscopic susceptibility anisotropy imaging
topic Full Papers—Biophysics and Basic Biomedical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32378746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28303
work_keys_str_mv AT kadenenrico microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging
AT gyorinoemig microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging
AT rudrapatnasumesh microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging
AT barskayairinay microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging
AT dragonuiulius microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging
AT doesmarkd microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging
AT jonesderekk microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging
AT clarkchrisa microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging
AT alexanderdanielc microscopicsusceptibilityanisotropyimaging