Cargando…

Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data

PURPOSE: To demonstrate that mapping pelvis conductivity at 3T with deep learning (DL) is feasible. METHODS: 210 dielectric pelvic models were generated based on CT scans of 42 cervical cancer patients. For all dielectric models, electromagnetic and MR simulations with realistic accuracy and precisi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gavazzi, Soraya, van den Berg, Cornelis A. T., Savenije, Mark H. F., Kok, H. Petra, de Boer, Peter, Stalpers, Lukas J. A., Lagendijk, Jan J. W., Crezee, Hans, van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32314825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28285
_version_ 1783566676654030848
author Gavazzi, Soraya
van den Berg, Cornelis A. T.
Savenije, Mark H. F.
Kok, H. Petra
de Boer, Peter
Stalpers, Lukas J. A.
Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
Crezee, Hans
van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W.
author_facet Gavazzi, Soraya
van den Berg, Cornelis A. T.
Savenije, Mark H. F.
Kok, H. Petra
de Boer, Peter
Stalpers, Lukas J. A.
Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
Crezee, Hans
van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W.
author_sort Gavazzi, Soraya
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To demonstrate that mapping pelvis conductivity at 3T with deep learning (DL) is feasible. METHODS: 210 dielectric pelvic models were generated based on CT scans of 42 cervical cancer patients. For all dielectric models, electromagnetic and MR simulations with realistic accuracy and precision were performed to obtain [Formula: see text] and transceive phase (ϕ(±)). Simulated [Formula: see text] and ϕ(±) served as input to a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network, which was trained in a supervised fashion to retrieve the conductivity. The same network architecture was retrained using only ϕ(±) in input. Both network configurations were tested on simulated MR data and their conductivity reconstruction accuracy and precision were assessed. Furthermore, both network configurations were used to reconstruct conductivity maps from a healthy volunteer and two cervical cancer patients. DL‐based conductivity was compared in vivo and in silico to Helmholtz‐based (H‐EPT) conductivity. RESULTS: Conductivity maps obtained from both network configurations were comparable. Accuracy was assessed by mean error (ME) with respect to ground truth conductivity. On average, ME < 0.1 Sm(−1) for all tissues. Maximum MEs were 0.2 Sm(−1) for muscle and tumour, and 0.4 Sm(−1) for bladder. Precision was indicated with the difference between 90(th) and 10(th) conductivity percentiles, and was below 0.1 Sm(−1) for fat, bone and muscle, 0.2 Sm(−1) for tumour and 0.3 Sm(−1) for bladder. In vivo, DL‐based conductivity had median values in agreement with H‐EPT values, but a higher precision. CONCLUSION: Anatomically detailed, noise‐robust 3D conductivity maps with good sensitivity to tissue conductivity variations were reconstructed in the pelvis with DL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7402024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74020242020-08-06 Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data Gavazzi, Soraya van den Berg, Cornelis A. T. Savenije, Mark H. F. Kok, H. Petra de Boer, Peter Stalpers, Lukas J. A. Lagendijk, Jan J. W. Crezee, Hans van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W. Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Computer Processing and Modeling PURPOSE: To demonstrate that mapping pelvis conductivity at 3T with deep learning (DL) is feasible. METHODS: 210 dielectric pelvic models were generated based on CT scans of 42 cervical cancer patients. For all dielectric models, electromagnetic and MR simulations with realistic accuracy and precision were performed to obtain [Formula: see text] and transceive phase (ϕ(±)). Simulated [Formula: see text] and ϕ(±) served as input to a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network, which was trained in a supervised fashion to retrieve the conductivity. The same network architecture was retrained using only ϕ(±) in input. Both network configurations were tested on simulated MR data and their conductivity reconstruction accuracy and precision were assessed. Furthermore, both network configurations were used to reconstruct conductivity maps from a healthy volunteer and two cervical cancer patients. DL‐based conductivity was compared in vivo and in silico to Helmholtz‐based (H‐EPT) conductivity. RESULTS: Conductivity maps obtained from both network configurations were comparable. Accuracy was assessed by mean error (ME) with respect to ground truth conductivity. On average, ME < 0.1 Sm(−1) for all tissues. Maximum MEs were 0.2 Sm(−1) for muscle and tumour, and 0.4 Sm(−1) for bladder. Precision was indicated with the difference between 90(th) and 10(th) conductivity percentiles, and was below 0.1 Sm(−1) for fat, bone and muscle, 0.2 Sm(−1) for tumour and 0.3 Sm(−1) for bladder. In vivo, DL‐based conductivity had median values in agreement with H‐EPT values, but a higher precision. CONCLUSION: Anatomically detailed, noise‐robust 3D conductivity maps with good sensitivity to tissue conductivity variations were reconstructed in the pelvis with DL. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-21 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7402024/ /pubmed/32314825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28285 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Full Papers—Computer Processing and Modeling
Gavazzi, Soraya
van den Berg, Cornelis A. T.
Savenije, Mark H. F.
Kok, H. Petra
de Boer, Peter
Stalpers, Lukas J. A.
Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
Crezee, Hans
van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W.
Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data
title Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data
title_full Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data
title_fullStr Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data
title_full_unstemmed Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data
title_short Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data
title_sort deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3d patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated mr data
topic Full Papers—Computer Processing and Modeling
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32314825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28285
work_keys_str_mv AT gavazzisoraya deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata
AT vandenbergcornelisat deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata
AT savenijemarkhf deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata
AT kokhpetra deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata
AT deboerpeter deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata
AT stalperslukasja deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata
AT lagendijkjanjw deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata
AT crezeehans deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata
AT vanlierastridlhmw deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata