Cargando…
Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data
PURPOSE: To demonstrate that mapping pelvis conductivity at 3T with deep learning (DL) is feasible. METHODS: 210 dielectric pelvic models were generated based on CT scans of 42 cervical cancer patients. For all dielectric models, electromagnetic and MR simulations with realistic accuracy and precisi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32314825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28285 |
_version_ | 1783566676654030848 |
---|---|
author | Gavazzi, Soraya van den Berg, Cornelis A. T. Savenije, Mark H. F. Kok, H. Petra de Boer, Peter Stalpers, Lukas J. A. Lagendijk, Jan J. W. Crezee, Hans van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W. |
author_facet | Gavazzi, Soraya van den Berg, Cornelis A. T. Savenije, Mark H. F. Kok, H. Petra de Boer, Peter Stalpers, Lukas J. A. Lagendijk, Jan J. W. Crezee, Hans van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W. |
author_sort | Gavazzi, Soraya |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To demonstrate that mapping pelvis conductivity at 3T with deep learning (DL) is feasible. METHODS: 210 dielectric pelvic models were generated based on CT scans of 42 cervical cancer patients. For all dielectric models, electromagnetic and MR simulations with realistic accuracy and precision were performed to obtain [Formula: see text] and transceive phase (ϕ(±)). Simulated [Formula: see text] and ϕ(±) served as input to a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network, which was trained in a supervised fashion to retrieve the conductivity. The same network architecture was retrained using only ϕ(±) in input. Both network configurations were tested on simulated MR data and their conductivity reconstruction accuracy and precision were assessed. Furthermore, both network configurations were used to reconstruct conductivity maps from a healthy volunteer and two cervical cancer patients. DL‐based conductivity was compared in vivo and in silico to Helmholtz‐based (H‐EPT) conductivity. RESULTS: Conductivity maps obtained from both network configurations were comparable. Accuracy was assessed by mean error (ME) with respect to ground truth conductivity. On average, ME < 0.1 Sm(−1) for all tissues. Maximum MEs were 0.2 Sm(−1) for muscle and tumour, and 0.4 Sm(−1) for bladder. Precision was indicated with the difference between 90(th) and 10(th) conductivity percentiles, and was below 0.1 Sm(−1) for fat, bone and muscle, 0.2 Sm(−1) for tumour and 0.3 Sm(−1) for bladder. In vivo, DL‐based conductivity had median values in agreement with H‐EPT values, but a higher precision. CONCLUSION: Anatomically detailed, noise‐robust 3D conductivity maps with good sensitivity to tissue conductivity variations were reconstructed in the pelvis with DL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7402024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74020242020-08-06 Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data Gavazzi, Soraya van den Berg, Cornelis A. T. Savenije, Mark H. F. Kok, H. Petra de Boer, Peter Stalpers, Lukas J. A. Lagendijk, Jan J. W. Crezee, Hans van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W. Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Computer Processing and Modeling PURPOSE: To demonstrate that mapping pelvis conductivity at 3T with deep learning (DL) is feasible. METHODS: 210 dielectric pelvic models were generated based on CT scans of 42 cervical cancer patients. For all dielectric models, electromagnetic and MR simulations with realistic accuracy and precision were performed to obtain [Formula: see text] and transceive phase (ϕ(±)). Simulated [Formula: see text] and ϕ(±) served as input to a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network, which was trained in a supervised fashion to retrieve the conductivity. The same network architecture was retrained using only ϕ(±) in input. Both network configurations were tested on simulated MR data and their conductivity reconstruction accuracy and precision were assessed. Furthermore, both network configurations were used to reconstruct conductivity maps from a healthy volunteer and two cervical cancer patients. DL‐based conductivity was compared in vivo and in silico to Helmholtz‐based (H‐EPT) conductivity. RESULTS: Conductivity maps obtained from both network configurations were comparable. Accuracy was assessed by mean error (ME) with respect to ground truth conductivity. On average, ME < 0.1 Sm(−1) for all tissues. Maximum MEs were 0.2 Sm(−1) for muscle and tumour, and 0.4 Sm(−1) for bladder. Precision was indicated with the difference between 90(th) and 10(th) conductivity percentiles, and was below 0.1 Sm(−1) for fat, bone and muscle, 0.2 Sm(−1) for tumour and 0.3 Sm(−1) for bladder. In vivo, DL‐based conductivity had median values in agreement with H‐EPT values, but a higher precision. CONCLUSION: Anatomically detailed, noise‐robust 3D conductivity maps with good sensitivity to tissue conductivity variations were reconstructed in the pelvis with DL. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-21 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7402024/ /pubmed/32314825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28285 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Full Papers—Computer Processing and Modeling Gavazzi, Soraya van den Berg, Cornelis A. T. Savenije, Mark H. F. Kok, H. Petra de Boer, Peter Stalpers, Lukas J. A. Lagendijk, Jan J. W. Crezee, Hans van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W. Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data |
title | Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data |
title_full | Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data |
title_fullStr | Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data |
title_short | Deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3D patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated MR data |
title_sort | deep learning‐based reconstruction of in vivo pelvis conductivity with a 3d patch‐based convolutional neural network trained on simulated mr data |
topic | Full Papers—Computer Processing and Modeling |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32314825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gavazzisoraya deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata AT vandenbergcornelisat deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata AT savenijemarkhf deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata AT kokhpetra deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata AT deboerpeter deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata AT stalperslukasja deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata AT lagendijkjanjw deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata AT crezeehans deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata AT vanlierastridlhmw deeplearningbasedreconstructionofinvivopelvisconductivitywitha3dpatchbasedconvolutionalneuralnetworktrainedonsimulatedmrdata |