Cargando…

Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls

BACKGROUND: Consumer-based activity trackers are used to measure and improve physical activity. However, the accuracy of these devices as clinical endpoint or coaching tool is unclear. We investigated the use of two activity trackers as measuring and coaching tool in patients with Chronic Obstructiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blondeel, Astrid, Demeyer, Heleen, Janssens, Wim, Troosters, Thierry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32750073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236676
_version_ 1783566764554059776
author Blondeel, Astrid
Demeyer, Heleen
Janssens, Wim
Troosters, Thierry
author_facet Blondeel, Astrid
Demeyer, Heleen
Janssens, Wim
Troosters, Thierry
author_sort Blondeel, Astrid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Consumer-based activity trackers are used to measure and improve physical activity. However, the accuracy of these devices as clinical endpoint or coaching tool is unclear. We investigated the use of two activity trackers as measuring and coaching tool in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and healthy age-matched controls. METHODS: Daily steps were measured by two consumer-based activity trackers (Fitbit Zip, worn at the hip and Fitbit Alta, worn at the wrist) and a validated activity monitor (Dynaport Movemonitor) in 28 patients with COPD and 14 healthy age-matched controls for 14 consecutive days. To investigate the accuracy of the activity trackers as a clinical endpoint, mean step count per patient were compared with the reference activity monitor and agreement was investigated by Bland-Altman plots. To evaluate the accuracy of activity trackers as coaching tool, day-by-day differences within patients were calculated for all three devices. Additionally, consistency of ranking daily steps between the activity trackers and accelerometer was investigated by Kendall correlation coefficient. RESULTS: As a measuring tool, the hip worn activity tracker significantly underestimates daily step count in patients with COPD as compared to DAM (mean±SD Δ-1112±872 steps/day; p<0.0001). This underestimation is less prominent in healthy subjects (p = 0.21). The wrist worn activity tracker showed a non-significant overestimation of step count (p = 0.13) in patients with COPD, and a significant overestimation of daily steps in healthy controls (mean±SD Δ+1907±2147 steps/day; p = 0.006). As a coaching tool, both hip and wrist worn activity tracker were able to pick up the day-by-day variability as measured by Dynaport (consistency of ranking resp. r = 0.80; r = 0.68 in COPD). CONCLUSION: Although the accuracy of hip worn consumer-based activity trackers in patients with COPD and wrist worn activity trackers in healthy subjects as clinical endpoints is unsatisfactory, these devices are valid to use as a coaching tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7402478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74024782020-08-12 Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls Blondeel, Astrid Demeyer, Heleen Janssens, Wim Troosters, Thierry PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Consumer-based activity trackers are used to measure and improve physical activity. However, the accuracy of these devices as clinical endpoint or coaching tool is unclear. We investigated the use of two activity trackers as measuring and coaching tool in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and healthy age-matched controls. METHODS: Daily steps were measured by two consumer-based activity trackers (Fitbit Zip, worn at the hip and Fitbit Alta, worn at the wrist) and a validated activity monitor (Dynaport Movemonitor) in 28 patients with COPD and 14 healthy age-matched controls for 14 consecutive days. To investigate the accuracy of the activity trackers as a clinical endpoint, mean step count per patient were compared with the reference activity monitor and agreement was investigated by Bland-Altman plots. To evaluate the accuracy of activity trackers as coaching tool, day-by-day differences within patients were calculated for all three devices. Additionally, consistency of ranking daily steps between the activity trackers and accelerometer was investigated by Kendall correlation coefficient. RESULTS: As a measuring tool, the hip worn activity tracker significantly underestimates daily step count in patients with COPD as compared to DAM (mean±SD Δ-1112±872 steps/day; p<0.0001). This underestimation is less prominent in healthy subjects (p = 0.21). The wrist worn activity tracker showed a non-significant overestimation of step count (p = 0.13) in patients with COPD, and a significant overestimation of daily steps in healthy controls (mean±SD Δ+1907±2147 steps/day; p = 0.006). As a coaching tool, both hip and wrist worn activity tracker were able to pick up the day-by-day variability as measured by Dynaport (consistency of ranking resp. r = 0.80; r = 0.68 in COPD). CONCLUSION: Although the accuracy of hip worn consumer-based activity trackers in patients with COPD and wrist worn activity trackers in healthy subjects as clinical endpoints is unsatisfactory, these devices are valid to use as a coaching tool. Public Library of Science 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7402478/ /pubmed/32750073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236676 Text en © 2020 Blondeel et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blondeel, Astrid
Demeyer, Heleen
Janssens, Wim
Troosters, Thierry
Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls
title Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls
title_full Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls
title_fullStr Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls
title_short Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls
title_sort accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with copd and healthy controls
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32750073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236676
work_keys_str_mv AT blondeelastrid accuracyofconsumerbasedactivitytrackersasmeasuringtoolandcoachingdeviceinpatientswithcopdandhealthycontrols
AT demeyerheleen accuracyofconsumerbasedactivitytrackersasmeasuringtoolandcoachingdeviceinpatientswithcopdandhealthycontrols
AT janssenswim accuracyofconsumerbasedactivitytrackersasmeasuringtoolandcoachingdeviceinpatientswithcopdandhealthycontrols
AT troostersthierry accuracyofconsumerbasedactivitytrackersasmeasuringtoolandcoachingdeviceinpatientswithcopdandhealthycontrols