Cargando…

Mucoactive agents for acute respiratory failure in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a common cause of admission to intensive care units (ICUs). Mucoactive agents are medications that promote mucus clearance and are frequently administered in patients with ARF, despite a lack of evidence to underpin clinical decision making. The aim of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anand, Rohan, McAuley, Daniel F, Blackwood, Bronagh, Yap, Chee, ONeill, Brenda, Connolly, Bronwen, Borthwick, Mark, Shyamsundar, Murali, Warburton, John, van Meenen, David, Paulus, Frederique, Schultz, Marcus J, Dark, Paul, Bradley, Judy M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32513777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214355
_version_ 1783566783228149760
author Anand, Rohan
McAuley, Daniel F
Blackwood, Bronagh
Yap, Chee
ONeill, Brenda
Connolly, Bronwen
Borthwick, Mark
Shyamsundar, Murali
Warburton, John
van Meenen, David
Paulus, Frederique
Schultz, Marcus J
Dark, Paul
Bradley, Judy M
author_facet Anand, Rohan
McAuley, Daniel F
Blackwood, Bronagh
Yap, Chee
ONeill, Brenda
Connolly, Bronwen
Borthwick, Mark
Shyamsundar, Murali
Warburton, John
van Meenen, David
Paulus, Frederique
Schultz, Marcus J
Dark, Paul
Bradley, Judy M
author_sort Anand, Rohan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a common cause of admission to intensive care units (ICUs). Mucoactive agents are medications that promote mucus clearance and are frequently administered in patients with ARF, despite a lack of evidence to underpin clinical decision making. The aim of this systematic review was to determine if the use of mucoactive agents in patients with ARF improves clinical outcomes. METHODS: We searched electronic and grey literature (January 2020). Two reviewers independently screened, selected, extracted data and quality assessed studies. We included trials of adults receiving ventilatory support for ARF and involving at least one mucoactive agent compared with placebo or standard care. Outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation. Meta-analysis was undertaken using random-effects modelling and certainty of the evidence was assessed using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: Thirteen randomised controlled trials were included (1712 patients), investigating four different mucoactive agents. Mucoactive agents showed no effect on duration of mechanical ventilation (seven trials, mean difference (MD) −1.34, 95% CI −2.97 to 0.29, I(2)=82%, very low certainty) or mortality, hospital stay and ventilator-free days. There was an effect on reducing ICU length of stay in the mucoactive agent groups (10 trials, MD −3.22, 95% CI −5.49 to −0.96, I(2)=89%, very low certainty). CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support the use of mucoactive agents in critically ill patients with ARF. The existing evidence is of low quality. High-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to determine the role of specific mucoactive agents in critically ill patients with ARF. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018095408.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7402561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74025612020-08-17 Mucoactive agents for acute respiratory failure in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis Anand, Rohan McAuley, Daniel F Blackwood, Bronagh Yap, Chee ONeill, Brenda Connolly, Bronwen Borthwick, Mark Shyamsundar, Murali Warburton, John van Meenen, David Paulus, Frederique Schultz, Marcus J Dark, Paul Bradley, Judy M Thorax Critical Care PURPOSE: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a common cause of admission to intensive care units (ICUs). Mucoactive agents are medications that promote mucus clearance and are frequently administered in patients with ARF, despite a lack of evidence to underpin clinical decision making. The aim of this systematic review was to determine if the use of mucoactive agents in patients with ARF improves clinical outcomes. METHODS: We searched electronic and grey literature (January 2020). Two reviewers independently screened, selected, extracted data and quality assessed studies. We included trials of adults receiving ventilatory support for ARF and involving at least one mucoactive agent compared with placebo or standard care. Outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation. Meta-analysis was undertaken using random-effects modelling and certainty of the evidence was assessed using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: Thirteen randomised controlled trials were included (1712 patients), investigating four different mucoactive agents. Mucoactive agents showed no effect on duration of mechanical ventilation (seven trials, mean difference (MD) −1.34, 95% CI −2.97 to 0.29, I(2)=82%, very low certainty) or mortality, hospital stay and ventilator-free days. There was an effect on reducing ICU length of stay in the mucoactive agent groups (10 trials, MD −3.22, 95% CI −5.49 to −0.96, I(2)=89%, very low certainty). CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support the use of mucoactive agents in critically ill patients with ARF. The existing evidence is of low quality. High-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to determine the role of specific mucoactive agents in critically ill patients with ARF. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018095408. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7402561/ /pubmed/32513777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214355 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Critical Care
Anand, Rohan
McAuley, Daniel F
Blackwood, Bronagh
Yap, Chee
ONeill, Brenda
Connolly, Bronwen
Borthwick, Mark
Shyamsundar, Murali
Warburton, John
van Meenen, David
Paulus, Frederique
Schultz, Marcus J
Dark, Paul
Bradley, Judy M
Mucoactive agents for acute respiratory failure in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Mucoactive agents for acute respiratory failure in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Mucoactive agents for acute respiratory failure in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Mucoactive agents for acute respiratory failure in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Mucoactive agents for acute respiratory failure in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Mucoactive agents for acute respiratory failure in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort mucoactive agents for acute respiratory failure in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Critical Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32513777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214355
work_keys_str_mv AT anandrohan mucoactiveagentsforacuterespiratoryfailureinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mcauleydanielf mucoactiveagentsforacuterespiratoryfailureinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT blackwoodbronagh mucoactiveagentsforacuterespiratoryfailureinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yapchee mucoactiveagentsforacuterespiratoryfailureinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT oneillbrenda mucoactiveagentsforacuterespiratoryfailureinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT connollybronwen mucoactiveagentsforacuterespiratoryfailureinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT borthwickmark mucoactiveagentsforacuterespiratoryfailureinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shyamsundarmurali mucoactiveagentsforacuterespiratoryfailureinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT warburtonjohn mucoactiveagentsforacuterespiratoryfailureinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanmeenendavid mucoactiveagentsforacuterespiratoryfailureinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT paulusfrederique mucoactiveagentsforacuterespiratoryfailureinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schultzmarcusj mucoactiveagentsforacuterespiratoryfailureinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT darkpaul mucoactiveagentsforacuterespiratoryfailureinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bradleyjudym mucoactiveagentsforacuterespiratoryfailureinthecriticallyillasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis