Cargando…

Cross-Country Comparison of Public Awareness, Rumors, and Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Epidemic: Infodemiology Study

BACKGROUND: Understanding public behavioral responses to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic and the accompanying infodemic is crucial to controlling the epidemic. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess real-time public awareness and behavioral responses to the COVID-19 epidemic acro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Zhiyuan, Du, Fanxing, Zhou, Xinyu, Jiang, Hao, Martin, Sam, Larson, Heidi, Lin, Leesa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32701460
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21143
_version_ 1783566795368562688
author Hou, Zhiyuan
Du, Fanxing
Zhou, Xinyu
Jiang, Hao
Martin, Sam
Larson, Heidi
Lin, Leesa
author_facet Hou, Zhiyuan
Du, Fanxing
Zhou, Xinyu
Jiang, Hao
Martin, Sam
Larson, Heidi
Lin, Leesa
author_sort Hou, Zhiyuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding public behavioral responses to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic and the accompanying infodemic is crucial to controlling the epidemic. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess real-time public awareness and behavioral responses to the COVID-19 epidemic across 12 selected countries. METHODS: Internet surveillance was used to collect real-time data from the general public to assess public awareness and rumors (China: Baidu; worldwide: Google Trends) and behavior responses (China: Ali Index; worldwide: Google Shopping). These indices measured the daily number of searches or purchases and were compared with the numbers of daily COVID-19 cases. The trend comparisons across selected countries were observed from December 1, 2019 (prepandemic baseline) to April 11, 2020 (at least one month after the governments of selected countries took actions for the pandemic). RESULTS: We identified missed windows of opportunity for early epidemic control in 12 countries, when public awareness was very low despite the emerging epidemic. China's epidemic and the declaration of a public health emergency of international concern did not prompt a worldwide public reaction to adopt health-protective measures; instead, most countries and regions only responded to the epidemic after their own case counts increased. Rumors and misinformation led to a surge of sales in herbal remedies in China and antimalarial drugs worldwide, and timely clarification of rumors mitigated the rush to purchase unproven remedies. CONCLUSIONS: Our comparative study highlights the urgent need for international coordination to promote mutual learning about epidemic characteristics and effective control measures as well as to trigger early and timely responses in individual countries. Early release of official guidelines and timely clarification of rumors led by governments are necessary to guide the public to take rational action.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7402643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74026432020-08-17 Cross-Country Comparison of Public Awareness, Rumors, and Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Epidemic: Infodemiology Study Hou, Zhiyuan Du, Fanxing Zhou, Xinyu Jiang, Hao Martin, Sam Larson, Heidi Lin, Leesa J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Understanding public behavioral responses to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic and the accompanying infodemic is crucial to controlling the epidemic. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess real-time public awareness and behavioral responses to the COVID-19 epidemic across 12 selected countries. METHODS: Internet surveillance was used to collect real-time data from the general public to assess public awareness and rumors (China: Baidu; worldwide: Google Trends) and behavior responses (China: Ali Index; worldwide: Google Shopping). These indices measured the daily number of searches or purchases and were compared with the numbers of daily COVID-19 cases. The trend comparisons across selected countries were observed from December 1, 2019 (prepandemic baseline) to April 11, 2020 (at least one month after the governments of selected countries took actions for the pandemic). RESULTS: We identified missed windows of opportunity for early epidemic control in 12 countries, when public awareness was very low despite the emerging epidemic. China's epidemic and the declaration of a public health emergency of international concern did not prompt a worldwide public reaction to adopt health-protective measures; instead, most countries and regions only responded to the epidemic after their own case counts increased. Rumors and misinformation led to a surge of sales in herbal remedies in China and antimalarial drugs worldwide, and timely clarification of rumors mitigated the rush to purchase unproven remedies. CONCLUSIONS: Our comparative study highlights the urgent need for international coordination to promote mutual learning about epidemic characteristics and effective control measures as well as to trigger early and timely responses in individual countries. Early release of official guidelines and timely clarification of rumors led by governments are necessary to guide the public to take rational action. JMIR Publications 2020-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7402643/ /pubmed/32701460 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21143 Text en ©Zhiyuan Hou, Fanxing Du, Xinyu Zhou, Hao Jiang, Sam Martin, Heidi Larson, Leesa Lin. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 03.08.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hou, Zhiyuan
Du, Fanxing
Zhou, Xinyu
Jiang, Hao
Martin, Sam
Larson, Heidi
Lin, Leesa
Cross-Country Comparison of Public Awareness, Rumors, and Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Epidemic: Infodemiology Study
title Cross-Country Comparison of Public Awareness, Rumors, and Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Epidemic: Infodemiology Study
title_full Cross-Country Comparison of Public Awareness, Rumors, and Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Epidemic: Infodemiology Study
title_fullStr Cross-Country Comparison of Public Awareness, Rumors, and Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Epidemic: Infodemiology Study
title_full_unstemmed Cross-Country Comparison of Public Awareness, Rumors, and Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Epidemic: Infodemiology Study
title_short Cross-Country Comparison of Public Awareness, Rumors, and Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Epidemic: Infodemiology Study
title_sort cross-country comparison of public awareness, rumors, and behavioral responses to the covid-19 epidemic: infodemiology study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32701460
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21143
work_keys_str_mv AT houzhiyuan crosscountrycomparisonofpublicawarenessrumorsandbehavioralresponsestothecovid19epidemicinfodemiologystudy
AT dufanxing crosscountrycomparisonofpublicawarenessrumorsandbehavioralresponsestothecovid19epidemicinfodemiologystudy
AT zhouxinyu crosscountrycomparisonofpublicawarenessrumorsandbehavioralresponsestothecovid19epidemicinfodemiologystudy
AT jianghao crosscountrycomparisonofpublicawarenessrumorsandbehavioralresponsestothecovid19epidemicinfodemiologystudy
AT martinsam crosscountrycomparisonofpublicawarenessrumorsandbehavioralresponsestothecovid19epidemicinfodemiologystudy
AT larsonheidi crosscountrycomparisonofpublicawarenessrumorsandbehavioralresponsestothecovid19epidemicinfodemiologystudy
AT linleesa crosscountrycomparisonofpublicawarenessrumorsandbehavioralresponsestothecovid19epidemicinfodemiologystudy