Cargando…

External validation of the prognostic relevance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in pancreatic cancer patients

BACKGROUND: The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) was first introduced for prognosis prediction in lung cancer patients and since then evaluated in several other malignancies. However, in pancreatic cancer (PC) the ALI and its prognostic utility were only investigated in a comparably sma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barth, Dominik Andreas, Brenner, Carina, Riedl, Jakob Michael, Prinz, Felix, Klocker, Eva Valentina, Schlick, Konstantin, Kornprat, Peter, Lackner, Karoline, Stöger, Herbert, Stotz, Michael, Gerger, Armin, Pichler, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3233
_version_ 1783566829634977792
author Barth, Dominik Andreas
Brenner, Carina
Riedl, Jakob Michael
Prinz, Felix
Klocker, Eva Valentina
Schlick, Konstantin
Kornprat, Peter
Lackner, Karoline
Stöger, Herbert
Stotz, Michael
Gerger, Armin
Pichler, Martin
author_facet Barth, Dominik Andreas
Brenner, Carina
Riedl, Jakob Michael
Prinz, Felix
Klocker, Eva Valentina
Schlick, Konstantin
Kornprat, Peter
Lackner, Karoline
Stöger, Herbert
Stotz, Michael
Gerger, Armin
Pichler, Martin
author_sort Barth, Dominik Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) was first introduced for prognosis prediction in lung cancer patients and since then evaluated in several other malignancies. However, in pancreatic cancer (PC) the ALI and its prognostic utility were only investigated in a comparably small and specific cohort of locally advanced PC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: In our single‐center cohort study, we included 429 patients with histologically verified PC who were treated between 2003 and 2015 at our academic institution. The ALI was defined as body mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)) × serum albumin levels (g/dL)/neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and we defined the optimal cutoff for biomarker dichotomization by ROC‐analysis. Kaplan‐Meier method as well as uni‐ and multivariate Cox regression Hazard proportional models were implemented to assess the prognostic potential of ALI in PC patients. We considered cancer‐specific survival (CSS) as the primary endpoint of the study. RESULTS: The ALI showed a significant negative correlation with CA19‐9 levels and C‐reactive protein levels whereas we found an association with localized tumor stage and better performance status (P < .05 for all mentioned variables). As opposed to patients with a high ALI, decreased ALI was significantly associated with shorter CSS (HR = 0.606, 95% CI: 0.471‐0.779, P = .001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor grade, tumor stage, chemotherapy, C‐reactive protein levels, and CA19‐9 levels to independently predict for CSS (all P < .05). In contrast the ALI failed to independently predict for CSS in the performed multivariate models (HR = 0.878, 95% CI: 0.643‐1.198, P = .411). CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of PC patients, the ALI did not complement existing clinicopathological factors for outcome determination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7402815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74028152020-08-06 External validation of the prognostic relevance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in pancreatic cancer patients Barth, Dominik Andreas Brenner, Carina Riedl, Jakob Michael Prinz, Felix Klocker, Eva Valentina Schlick, Konstantin Kornprat, Peter Lackner, Karoline Stöger, Herbert Stotz, Michael Gerger, Armin Pichler, Martin Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) was first introduced for prognosis prediction in lung cancer patients and since then evaluated in several other malignancies. However, in pancreatic cancer (PC) the ALI and its prognostic utility were only investigated in a comparably small and specific cohort of locally advanced PC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: In our single‐center cohort study, we included 429 patients with histologically verified PC who were treated between 2003 and 2015 at our academic institution. The ALI was defined as body mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)) × serum albumin levels (g/dL)/neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and we defined the optimal cutoff for biomarker dichotomization by ROC‐analysis. Kaplan‐Meier method as well as uni‐ and multivariate Cox regression Hazard proportional models were implemented to assess the prognostic potential of ALI in PC patients. We considered cancer‐specific survival (CSS) as the primary endpoint of the study. RESULTS: The ALI showed a significant negative correlation with CA19‐9 levels and C‐reactive protein levels whereas we found an association with localized tumor stage and better performance status (P < .05 for all mentioned variables). As opposed to patients with a high ALI, decreased ALI was significantly associated with shorter CSS (HR = 0.606, 95% CI: 0.471‐0.779, P = .001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor grade, tumor stage, chemotherapy, C‐reactive protein levels, and CA19‐9 levels to independently predict for CSS (all P < .05). In contrast the ALI failed to independently predict for CSS in the performed multivariate models (HR = 0.878, 95% CI: 0.643‐1.198, P = .411). CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of PC patients, the ALI did not complement existing clinicopathological factors for outcome determination. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7402815/ /pubmed/32537935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3233 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Barth, Dominik Andreas
Brenner, Carina
Riedl, Jakob Michael
Prinz, Felix
Klocker, Eva Valentina
Schlick, Konstantin
Kornprat, Peter
Lackner, Karoline
Stöger, Herbert
Stotz, Michael
Gerger, Armin
Pichler, Martin
External validation of the prognostic relevance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in pancreatic cancer patients
title External validation of the prognostic relevance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in pancreatic cancer patients
title_full External validation of the prognostic relevance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in pancreatic cancer patients
title_fullStr External validation of the prognostic relevance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in pancreatic cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed External validation of the prognostic relevance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in pancreatic cancer patients
title_short External validation of the prognostic relevance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in pancreatic cancer patients
title_sort external validation of the prognostic relevance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ali) in pancreatic cancer patients
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7402815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3233
work_keys_str_mv AT barthdominikandreas externalvalidationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftheadvancedlungcancerinflammationindexaliinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT brennercarina externalvalidationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftheadvancedlungcancerinflammationindexaliinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT riedljakobmichael externalvalidationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftheadvancedlungcancerinflammationindexaliinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT prinzfelix externalvalidationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftheadvancedlungcancerinflammationindexaliinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT klockerevavalentina externalvalidationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftheadvancedlungcancerinflammationindexaliinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT schlickkonstantin externalvalidationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftheadvancedlungcancerinflammationindexaliinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT kornpratpeter externalvalidationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftheadvancedlungcancerinflammationindexaliinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT lacknerkaroline externalvalidationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftheadvancedlungcancerinflammationindexaliinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT stogerherbert externalvalidationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftheadvancedlungcancerinflammationindexaliinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT stotzmichael externalvalidationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftheadvancedlungcancerinflammationindexaliinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT gergerarmin externalvalidationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftheadvancedlungcancerinflammationindexaliinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT pichlermartin externalvalidationoftheprognosticrelevanceoftheadvancedlungcancerinflammationindexaliinpancreaticcancerpatients