Cargando…
A brief introduction to propensity score for anesthesiologists
Intergroup comparability is of paramount importance in clinical research since it is impossible to draw conclusions on a treatment if populations with different characteristics are compared. While an adequate randomization process in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ensures a balanced distributio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32238789 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kja.20016 |
_version_ | 1783566882915221504 |
---|---|
author | De Cassai, Alessandro Andreatta, Giulio Boscolo, Annalisa Munari, Marina Navalesi, Paolo |
author_facet | De Cassai, Alessandro Andreatta, Giulio Boscolo, Annalisa Munari, Marina Navalesi, Paolo |
author_sort | De Cassai, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intergroup comparability is of paramount importance in clinical research since it is impossible to draw conclusions on a treatment if populations with different characteristics are compared. While an adequate randomization process in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ensures a balanced distribution of subjects between groups, the distribution in observational prospective and retrospective studies may be influenced by many confounders. Propensity score (PS) is a statistical technique that was developed more than 30 years ago with the purpose of estimating the probability to be assigned to a group. Once evaluated, the PS could be used to adjust and balance the groups using different methods such as matching, stratification, covariate adjustment, and weighting. The validity of PS is strictly related to the confounders used in the model, and confounders that are either not identified or not available will produce biases in the results. RCTs will therefore continue to provide the highest quality of evidence, but PS allows fine adjustments on otherwise unbalanced groups, which will increase the strength and quality of observational studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7403107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Korean Society of Anesthesiologists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74031072020-08-11 A brief introduction to propensity score for anesthesiologists De Cassai, Alessandro Andreatta, Giulio Boscolo, Annalisa Munari, Marina Navalesi, Paolo Korean J Anesthesiol Statistical Round Intergroup comparability is of paramount importance in clinical research since it is impossible to draw conclusions on a treatment if populations with different characteristics are compared. While an adequate randomization process in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ensures a balanced distribution of subjects between groups, the distribution in observational prospective and retrospective studies may be influenced by many confounders. Propensity score (PS) is a statistical technique that was developed more than 30 years ago with the purpose of estimating the probability to be assigned to a group. Once evaluated, the PS could be used to adjust and balance the groups using different methods such as matching, stratification, covariate adjustment, and weighting. The validity of PS is strictly related to the confounders used in the model, and confounders that are either not identified or not available will produce biases in the results. RCTs will therefore continue to provide the highest quality of evidence, but PS allows fine adjustments on otherwise unbalanced groups, which will increase the strength and quality of observational studies. Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2020-08 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7403107/ /pubmed/32238789 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kja.20016 Text en Copyright © The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2020 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Statistical Round De Cassai, Alessandro Andreatta, Giulio Boscolo, Annalisa Munari, Marina Navalesi, Paolo A brief introduction to propensity score for anesthesiologists |
title | A brief introduction to propensity score for anesthesiologists |
title_full | A brief introduction to propensity score for anesthesiologists |
title_fullStr | A brief introduction to propensity score for anesthesiologists |
title_full_unstemmed | A brief introduction to propensity score for anesthesiologists |
title_short | A brief introduction to propensity score for anesthesiologists |
title_sort | brief introduction to propensity score for anesthesiologists |
topic | Statistical Round |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32238789 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kja.20016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT decassaialessandro abriefintroductiontopropensityscoreforanesthesiologists AT andreattagiulio abriefintroductiontopropensityscoreforanesthesiologists AT boscoloannalisa abriefintroductiontopropensityscoreforanesthesiologists AT munarimarina abriefintroductiontopropensityscoreforanesthesiologists AT navalesipaolo abriefintroductiontopropensityscoreforanesthesiologists AT decassaialessandro briefintroductiontopropensityscoreforanesthesiologists AT andreattagiulio briefintroductiontopropensityscoreforanesthesiologists AT boscoloannalisa briefintroductiontopropensityscoreforanesthesiologists AT munarimarina briefintroductiontopropensityscoreforanesthesiologists AT navalesipaolo briefintroductiontopropensityscoreforanesthesiologists |