Cargando…
Monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity
The radioactive nature of radon makes it a powerful tracer for fluid movements in the crust, and a potentially effective marker to study processes connected with earthquakes preparatory phase. To explore the feasibility of using soil radon variations as earthquakes precursor, we analyse the radon co...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32753703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69821-2 |
_version_ | 1783566893177634816 |
---|---|
author | Soldati, Gaia Cannelli, Valentina Piersanti, Antonio |
author_facet | Soldati, Gaia Cannelli, Valentina Piersanti, Antonio |
author_sort | Soldati, Gaia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The radioactive nature of radon makes it a powerful tracer for fluid movements in the crust, and a potentially effective marker to study processes connected with earthquakes preparatory phase. To explore the feasibility of using soil radon variations as earthquakes precursor, we analyse the radon concentration data recorded by two stations located close to the epicentre of the strongest mainshock (Mw 6.5 on October 30, 2016) of the seismic sequence which affected central Italy from August 2016. The two stations CTTR and NRCA operate in the framework of the permanent Italian Radon monitoring Network and recorded almost continuously since 2012 and 2016, respectively, the latter being installed just after the first mainshock of the sequence (Mw 6.0 on August 24, 2016). An increase of radon emanation is clearly visible about 2 weeks before the Mw 6.5 event on both the time series, more pronounced on NRCA, nearer to the epicentre, suggesting the possibility of a direct association with the earthquake occurrence. An independently developed detection algorithm aimed at highlighting the connections between radon emission variations and major earthquakes occurrence succeeds in forecasting the Mw 6.5 mainshock on NRCA time series. The resulting time advance of the alarm is consistent with that obtained using a Bayesian approach to compute the a posteriori probability of multiple change points on the radon time series of NRCA. Moreover, it is in agreement with the delay time which maximizes the correlation between radon and seismic anomalies. Applying the detection algorithm to CTTR time series returns alarms for both the Mw 6.0 event, with epicentre closer to this station, and the stronger Mw 6.5 event, but with a higher number of false detections. Finally, we found that a preliminary correction of the bias introduced by variations of meteorological parameters does not affect our main finding of an increase in radon concentration before the major mainshocks. Our study confirms that, although much work is still needed, a monitoring approach based on a permanent dense network is crucial for making radon time series analysis an effective complement to traditional seismological tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7403152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74031522020-08-07 Monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity Soldati, Gaia Cannelli, Valentina Piersanti, Antonio Sci Rep Article The radioactive nature of radon makes it a powerful tracer for fluid movements in the crust, and a potentially effective marker to study processes connected with earthquakes preparatory phase. To explore the feasibility of using soil radon variations as earthquakes precursor, we analyse the radon concentration data recorded by two stations located close to the epicentre of the strongest mainshock (Mw 6.5 on October 30, 2016) of the seismic sequence which affected central Italy from August 2016. The two stations CTTR and NRCA operate in the framework of the permanent Italian Radon monitoring Network and recorded almost continuously since 2012 and 2016, respectively, the latter being installed just after the first mainshock of the sequence (Mw 6.0 on August 24, 2016). An increase of radon emanation is clearly visible about 2 weeks before the Mw 6.5 event on both the time series, more pronounced on NRCA, nearer to the epicentre, suggesting the possibility of a direct association with the earthquake occurrence. An independently developed detection algorithm aimed at highlighting the connections between radon emission variations and major earthquakes occurrence succeeds in forecasting the Mw 6.5 mainshock on NRCA time series. The resulting time advance of the alarm is consistent with that obtained using a Bayesian approach to compute the a posteriori probability of multiple change points on the radon time series of NRCA. Moreover, it is in agreement with the delay time which maximizes the correlation between radon and seismic anomalies. Applying the detection algorithm to CTTR time series returns alarms for both the Mw 6.0 event, with epicentre closer to this station, and the stronger Mw 6.5 event, but with a higher number of false detections. Finally, we found that a preliminary correction of the bias introduced by variations of meteorological parameters does not affect our main finding of an increase in radon concentration before the major mainshocks. Our study confirms that, although much work is still needed, a monitoring approach based on a permanent dense network is crucial for making radon time series analysis an effective complement to traditional seismological tools. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7403152/ /pubmed/32753703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69821-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Soldati, Gaia Cannelli, Valentina Piersanti, Antonio Monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity |
title | Monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity |
title_full | Monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity |
title_fullStr | Monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity |
title_short | Monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity |
title_sort | monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central italy sequence in light of seismicity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32753703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69821-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soldatigaia monitoringsoilradonduringthe20162017centralitalysequenceinlightofseismicity AT cannellivalentina monitoringsoilradonduringthe20162017centralitalysequenceinlightofseismicity AT piersantiantonio monitoringsoilradonduringthe20162017centralitalysequenceinlightofseismicity |