Cargando…
Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Computerized pupillary light reflex assessment devices (CPLRADs) may serve as an effective screening tool for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, since they can dynamically detect abnormal pupillary responses from a novel sequence of light stimuli and functionally-shaped stimuli. The aim of this study wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00777 |
_version_ | 1783566942757453824 |
---|---|
author | Suo, Lingge Zhang, Di Qin, Xuejiao Li, Annan Zhang, Chun Wang, Yunhong |
author_facet | Suo, Lingge Zhang, Di Qin, Xuejiao Li, Annan Zhang, Chun Wang, Yunhong |
author_sort | Suo, Lingge |
collection | PubMed |
description | Computerized pupillary light reflex assessment devices (CPLRADs) may serve as an effective screening tool for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, since they can dynamically detect abnormal pupillary responses from a novel sequence of light stimuli and functionally-shaped stimuli. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the current state of advanced CPLRADs and accuracy of application in detecting glaucoma. An electronic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase from database inception to December 2019 was performed. Studies that reported data on the use of computer-aided pupillometry with monocular and/or binocular monitoring in glaucoma patients were included. Two review authors independently conducted the study selection and extracted study data. A total of twenty-five studies were included in this review; eight studies with a total of 829 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. Data were pooled using a random-effect model, since the significant heterogeneity (P < 0.1, I(2)> 50%). Our meta-analysis of eight studies showed reasonably high summary sensitivity and specificity estimates of 0.81 (95% CI 0.73–0.89) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75–0.91), respectively. Simpler monochromatic devices, such as Pupilmetrix(TM) PLR60, generally performed as well as or slightly better than more complex chromatic devices. This review suggests that CPLRADs may facilitate direct clinical decision making for glaucoma diagnosis and evaluation, and may provide a deeper understanding of the pathomechanism of glaucoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7403439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74034392020-08-25 Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Suo, Lingge Zhang, Di Qin, Xuejiao Li, Annan Zhang, Chun Wang, Yunhong Front Neurol Neurology Computerized pupillary light reflex assessment devices (CPLRADs) may serve as an effective screening tool for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, since they can dynamically detect abnormal pupillary responses from a novel sequence of light stimuli and functionally-shaped stimuli. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the current state of advanced CPLRADs and accuracy of application in detecting glaucoma. An electronic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase from database inception to December 2019 was performed. Studies that reported data on the use of computer-aided pupillometry with monocular and/or binocular monitoring in glaucoma patients were included. Two review authors independently conducted the study selection and extracted study data. A total of twenty-five studies were included in this review; eight studies with a total of 829 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. Data were pooled using a random-effect model, since the significant heterogeneity (P < 0.1, I(2)> 50%). Our meta-analysis of eight studies showed reasonably high summary sensitivity and specificity estimates of 0.81 (95% CI 0.73–0.89) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75–0.91), respectively. Simpler monochromatic devices, such as Pupilmetrix(TM) PLR60, generally performed as well as or slightly better than more complex chromatic devices. This review suggests that CPLRADs may facilitate direct clinical decision making for glaucoma diagnosis and evaluation, and may provide a deeper understanding of the pathomechanism of glaucoma. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7403439/ /pubmed/32849229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00777 Text en Copyright © 2020 Suo, Zhang, Qin, Li, Zhang and Wang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Suo, Lingge Zhang, Di Qin, Xuejiao Li, Annan Zhang, Chun Wang, Yunhong Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | evaluating state-of-the-art computerized pupillary assessments for glaucoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00777 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suolingge evaluatingstateoftheartcomputerizedpupillaryassessmentsforglaucomadetectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangdi evaluatingstateoftheartcomputerizedpupillaryassessmentsforglaucomadetectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qinxuejiao evaluatingstateoftheartcomputerizedpupillaryassessmentsforglaucomadetectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liannan evaluatingstateoftheartcomputerizedpupillaryassessmentsforglaucomadetectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangchun evaluatingstateoftheartcomputerizedpupillaryassessmentsforglaucomadetectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangyunhong evaluatingstateoftheartcomputerizedpupillaryassessmentsforglaucomadetectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |