Cargando…

Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Computerized pupillary light reflex assessment devices (CPLRADs) may serve as an effective screening tool for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, since they can dynamically detect abnormal pupillary responses from a novel sequence of light stimuli and functionally-shaped stimuli. The aim of this study wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suo, Lingge, Zhang, Di, Qin, Xuejiao, Li, Annan, Zhang, Chun, Wang, Yunhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849229
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00777
_version_ 1783566942757453824
author Suo, Lingge
Zhang, Di
Qin, Xuejiao
Li, Annan
Zhang, Chun
Wang, Yunhong
author_facet Suo, Lingge
Zhang, Di
Qin, Xuejiao
Li, Annan
Zhang, Chun
Wang, Yunhong
author_sort Suo, Lingge
collection PubMed
description Computerized pupillary light reflex assessment devices (CPLRADs) may serve as an effective screening tool for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, since they can dynamically detect abnormal pupillary responses from a novel sequence of light stimuli and functionally-shaped stimuli. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the current state of advanced CPLRADs and accuracy of application in detecting glaucoma. An electronic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase from database inception to December 2019 was performed. Studies that reported data on the use of computer-aided pupillometry with monocular and/or binocular monitoring in glaucoma patients were included. Two review authors independently conducted the study selection and extracted study data. A total of twenty-five studies were included in this review; eight studies with a total of 829 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. Data were pooled using a random-effect model, since the significant heterogeneity (P < 0.1, I(2)> 50%). Our meta-analysis of eight studies showed reasonably high summary sensitivity and specificity estimates of 0.81 (95% CI 0.73–0.89) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75–0.91), respectively. Simpler monochromatic devices, such as Pupilmetrix(TM) PLR60, generally performed as well as or slightly better than more complex chromatic devices. This review suggests that CPLRADs may facilitate direct clinical decision making for glaucoma diagnosis and evaluation, and may provide a deeper understanding of the pathomechanism of glaucoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7403439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74034392020-08-25 Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Suo, Lingge Zhang, Di Qin, Xuejiao Li, Annan Zhang, Chun Wang, Yunhong Front Neurol Neurology Computerized pupillary light reflex assessment devices (CPLRADs) may serve as an effective screening tool for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, since they can dynamically detect abnormal pupillary responses from a novel sequence of light stimuli and functionally-shaped stimuli. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the current state of advanced CPLRADs and accuracy of application in detecting glaucoma. An electronic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase from database inception to December 2019 was performed. Studies that reported data on the use of computer-aided pupillometry with monocular and/or binocular monitoring in glaucoma patients were included. Two review authors independently conducted the study selection and extracted study data. A total of twenty-five studies were included in this review; eight studies with a total of 829 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. Data were pooled using a random-effect model, since the significant heterogeneity (P < 0.1, I(2)> 50%). Our meta-analysis of eight studies showed reasonably high summary sensitivity and specificity estimates of 0.81 (95% CI 0.73–0.89) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75–0.91), respectively. Simpler monochromatic devices, such as Pupilmetrix(TM) PLR60, generally performed as well as or slightly better than more complex chromatic devices. This review suggests that CPLRADs may facilitate direct clinical decision making for glaucoma diagnosis and evaluation, and may provide a deeper understanding of the pathomechanism of glaucoma. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7403439/ /pubmed/32849229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00777 Text en Copyright © 2020 Suo, Zhang, Qin, Li, Zhang and Wang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Suo, Lingge
Zhang, Di
Qin, Xuejiao
Li, Annan
Zhang, Chun
Wang, Yunhong
Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort evaluating state-of-the-art computerized pupillary assessments for glaucoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849229
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00777
work_keys_str_mv AT suolingge evaluatingstateoftheartcomputerizedpupillaryassessmentsforglaucomadetectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangdi evaluatingstateoftheartcomputerizedpupillaryassessmentsforglaucomadetectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qinxuejiao evaluatingstateoftheartcomputerizedpupillaryassessmentsforglaucomadetectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liannan evaluatingstateoftheartcomputerizedpupillaryassessmentsforglaucomadetectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangchun evaluatingstateoftheartcomputerizedpupillaryassessmentsforglaucomadetectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyunhong evaluatingstateoftheartcomputerizedpupillaryassessmentsforglaucomadetectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis