Cargando…

The value of multidetector-row computed tomography in lymph node staging of gastric cancer: a preliminary Vietnamese study

INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common malignant disease in the world, following breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and lung cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in identifying the metastatic lymph node of GC. MATERIA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sang, Nguyen Van, Duc, Nguyen Minh, Duc, Pham Hong, Tuan, Phung Anh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774138
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2020.97484
_version_ 1783567004151578624
author Sang, Nguyen Van
Duc, Nguyen Minh
Duc, Pham Hong
Tuan, Phung Anh
author_facet Sang, Nguyen Van
Duc, Nguyen Minh
Duc, Pham Hong
Tuan, Phung Anh
author_sort Sang, Nguyen Van
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common malignant disease in the world, following breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and lung cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in identifying the metastatic lymph node of GC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed after receiving approval by the institutional review board. A total of 88 patients with GC, who underwent radical gastrectomy, were examined by MDCT. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test. The discriminating ability of lymph node size was determined according to an area under the receiver operating curve(AUROC) analysis, and the optimal cut-off point was determined. RESULTS: The proportion of metastatic lymph node patients in the proximal group (32.3%) was significantly higher than that in the distal group (18.4%). T categorisation and lymph node sizes were significantly different between the non-metastatic lymph node and metastatic lymph node groups. The AUROC for lymph node size was 0.738, with an optimal cut-off point of 7.5 mm,producing a sensitivity of 71.5% and a specificity of 70.5%. CONCLUSIONS: MDCT displayed medium accuracy for the determination of metastatic lymph nodes and N categorisation. Based on our findings, although MDCT is generally the first choice for preoperative assessments in GC patients, other diagnostic modalities should supplement MDCT in order to achieve more precise N staging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7403761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74037612020-08-07 The value of multidetector-row computed tomography in lymph node staging of gastric cancer: a preliminary Vietnamese study Sang, Nguyen Van Duc, Nguyen Minh Duc, Pham Hong Tuan, Phung Anh Contemp Oncol (Pozn) Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common malignant disease in the world, following breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and lung cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in identifying the metastatic lymph node of GC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed after receiving approval by the institutional review board. A total of 88 patients with GC, who underwent radical gastrectomy, were examined by MDCT. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test. The discriminating ability of lymph node size was determined according to an area under the receiver operating curve(AUROC) analysis, and the optimal cut-off point was determined. RESULTS: The proportion of metastatic lymph node patients in the proximal group (32.3%) was significantly higher than that in the distal group (18.4%). T categorisation and lymph node sizes were significantly different between the non-metastatic lymph node and metastatic lymph node groups. The AUROC for lymph node size was 0.738, with an optimal cut-off point of 7.5 mm,producing a sensitivity of 71.5% and a specificity of 70.5%. CONCLUSIONS: MDCT displayed medium accuracy for the determination of metastatic lymph nodes and N categorisation. Based on our findings, although MDCT is generally the first choice for preoperative assessments in GC patients, other diagnostic modalities should supplement MDCT in order to achieve more precise N staging. Termedia Publishing House 2020-06-22 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7403761/ /pubmed/32774138 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2020.97484 Text en Copyright © 2020 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sang, Nguyen Van
Duc, Nguyen Minh
Duc, Pham Hong
Tuan, Phung Anh
The value of multidetector-row computed tomography in lymph node staging of gastric cancer: a preliminary Vietnamese study
title The value of multidetector-row computed tomography in lymph node staging of gastric cancer: a preliminary Vietnamese study
title_full The value of multidetector-row computed tomography in lymph node staging of gastric cancer: a preliminary Vietnamese study
title_fullStr The value of multidetector-row computed tomography in lymph node staging of gastric cancer: a preliminary Vietnamese study
title_full_unstemmed The value of multidetector-row computed tomography in lymph node staging of gastric cancer: a preliminary Vietnamese study
title_short The value of multidetector-row computed tomography in lymph node staging of gastric cancer: a preliminary Vietnamese study
title_sort value of multidetector-row computed tomography in lymph node staging of gastric cancer: a preliminary vietnamese study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774138
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2020.97484
work_keys_str_mv AT sangnguyenvan thevalueofmultidetectorrowcomputedtomographyinlymphnodestagingofgastriccancerapreliminaryvietnamesestudy
AT ducnguyenminh thevalueofmultidetectorrowcomputedtomographyinlymphnodestagingofgastriccancerapreliminaryvietnamesestudy
AT ducphamhong thevalueofmultidetectorrowcomputedtomographyinlymphnodestagingofgastriccancerapreliminaryvietnamesestudy
AT tuanphunganh thevalueofmultidetectorrowcomputedtomographyinlymphnodestagingofgastriccancerapreliminaryvietnamesestudy
AT sangnguyenvan valueofmultidetectorrowcomputedtomographyinlymphnodestagingofgastriccancerapreliminaryvietnamesestudy
AT ducnguyenminh valueofmultidetectorrowcomputedtomographyinlymphnodestagingofgastriccancerapreliminaryvietnamesestudy
AT ducphamhong valueofmultidetectorrowcomputedtomographyinlymphnodestagingofgastriccancerapreliminaryvietnamesestudy
AT tuanphunganh valueofmultidetectorrowcomputedtomographyinlymphnodestagingofgastriccancerapreliminaryvietnamesestudy