Cargando…
The Mobile Health App Trustworthiness Checklist: Usability Assessment
BACKGROUND: The mobile health (mHealth) app trustworthiness (mHAT) checklist was created to identify end users’ opinions on the characteristics of trustworthy mHealth apps and to communicate this information to app developers. To ensure that the checklist is suited for all relevant stakeholders, it...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7404005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32706733 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16844 |
_version_ | 1783567056175628288 |
---|---|
author | van Haasteren, Afua Vayena, Effy Powell, John |
author_facet | van Haasteren, Afua Vayena, Effy Powell, John |
author_sort | van Haasteren, Afua |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The mobile health (mHealth) app trustworthiness (mHAT) checklist was created to identify end users’ opinions on the characteristics of trustworthy mHealth apps and to communicate this information to app developers. To ensure that the checklist is suited for all relevant stakeholders, it is necessary to validate its contents. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of the mHAT checklist by modifying its contents according to ratings and suggestions from stakeholders familiar with the process of developing, managing, or curating mHealth apps. METHODS: A 44-item online survey was administered to relevant stakeholders. The survey was largely comprised of the mHAT checklist items, which respondents rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from completely disagree (1) to completely agree (5). RESULTS: In total, seven professional backgrounds were represented in the survey: administrators (n=6), health professionals (n=7), information technology personnel (n=6), managers (n=2), marketing personnel (n=3), researchers (n=5), and user experience researchers (n=8). Aside from one checklist item—“the app can inform end users about errors in measurements”—the combined positive ratings (ie, completely agree and agree) of the checklist items overwhelmingly exceeded the combined negative ratings (ie, completely disagree and disagree). Meanwhile, two additional items were included in the checklist: (1) business or funding model of the app and (2) details on app uninstallation statistics. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the mHAT checklist is a valuable resource for a broad range of stakeholders to develop trustworthy mHealth apps. Future studies should examine if the checklist works best for certain mHealth apps or in specific settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7404005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74040052020-08-17 The Mobile Health App Trustworthiness Checklist: Usability Assessment van Haasteren, Afua Vayena, Effy Powell, John JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: The mobile health (mHealth) app trustworthiness (mHAT) checklist was created to identify end users’ opinions on the characteristics of trustworthy mHealth apps and to communicate this information to app developers. To ensure that the checklist is suited for all relevant stakeholders, it is necessary to validate its contents. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of the mHAT checklist by modifying its contents according to ratings and suggestions from stakeholders familiar with the process of developing, managing, or curating mHealth apps. METHODS: A 44-item online survey was administered to relevant stakeholders. The survey was largely comprised of the mHAT checklist items, which respondents rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from completely disagree (1) to completely agree (5). RESULTS: In total, seven professional backgrounds were represented in the survey: administrators (n=6), health professionals (n=7), information technology personnel (n=6), managers (n=2), marketing personnel (n=3), researchers (n=5), and user experience researchers (n=8). Aside from one checklist item—“the app can inform end users about errors in measurements”—the combined positive ratings (ie, completely agree and agree) of the checklist items overwhelmingly exceeded the combined negative ratings (ie, completely disagree and disagree). Meanwhile, two additional items were included in the checklist: (1) business or funding model of the app and (2) details on app uninstallation statistics. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the mHAT checklist is a valuable resource for a broad range of stakeholders to develop trustworthy mHealth apps. Future studies should examine if the checklist works best for certain mHealth apps or in specific settings. JMIR Publications 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7404005/ /pubmed/32706733 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16844 Text en ©Afua van Haasteren, Effy Vayena, John Powell. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 21.07.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper van Haasteren, Afua Vayena, Effy Powell, John The Mobile Health App Trustworthiness Checklist: Usability Assessment |
title | The Mobile Health App Trustworthiness Checklist: Usability Assessment |
title_full | The Mobile Health App Trustworthiness Checklist: Usability Assessment |
title_fullStr | The Mobile Health App Trustworthiness Checklist: Usability Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | The Mobile Health App Trustworthiness Checklist: Usability Assessment |
title_short | The Mobile Health App Trustworthiness Checklist: Usability Assessment |
title_sort | mobile health app trustworthiness checklist: usability assessment |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7404005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32706733 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16844 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanhaasterenafua themobilehealthapptrustworthinesschecklistusabilityassessment AT vayenaeffy themobilehealthapptrustworthinesschecklistusabilityassessment AT powelljohn themobilehealthapptrustworthinesschecklistusabilityassessment AT vanhaasterenafua mobilehealthapptrustworthinesschecklistusabilityassessment AT vayenaeffy mobilehealthapptrustworthinesschecklistusabilityassessment AT powelljohn mobilehealthapptrustworthinesschecklistusabilityassessment |