Cargando…
Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network)
Two alternative methods for the production of compost from certain category 3 animal by‐products (catering waste and processed foodstuffs of animal origin) were assessed. The first proposed a minimum temperature of 55°C for 72 h; the second 60°C for 48 h, each with a maximum particle size of 200 mm....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7404150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774510 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6226 |
_version_ | 1783567088415145984 |
---|---|
author | Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Joseph Bover‐Cid, Sara Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert De Cesare, Alessandra Herman, Lieve Maria Hilbert, Friederike Lindqvist, Roland Nauta, Maarten Peixe, Luisa Ru, Giuseppe Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Suffredini, Elisabetta Escámez, Pablo Fernández Ortiz‐Peláez, Angel Ashe, Seán Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino |
author_facet | Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Joseph Bover‐Cid, Sara Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert De Cesare, Alessandra Herman, Lieve Maria Hilbert, Friederike Lindqvist, Roland Nauta, Maarten Peixe, Luisa Ru, Giuseppe Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Suffredini, Elisabetta Escámez, Pablo Fernández Ortiz‐Peláez, Angel Ashe, Seán Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two alternative methods for the production of compost from certain category 3 animal by‐products (catering waste and processed foodstuffs of animal origin) were assessed. The first proposed a minimum temperature of 55°C for 72 h; the second 60°C for 48 h, each with a maximum particle size of 200 mm. The proposed composting processes were assessed by the BIOHAZ Panel for their efficacy to achieve a reduction of 5 log(10) of Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg (775W, H(2)S negative) and a 3 log(10) reduction of the infectivity titre of thermoresistant viruses, such as parvovirus, in the composted material, as set out in Annex V, Chapter 3, Section 2 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011. The assessment of the BIOHAZ Panel exclusively focused on the ABP raw materials (catering waste and processed foodstuffs) intended for human consumption. The applicant did not provide any validation experiments with direct measurement of the reduction of viability of endogenous indicators or spiked surrogate bacteria. However, from thermal inactivation parameters reported in the literature, it can be concluded that the proposed composting standards can achieve at least a 5 log(10) reduction of Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg 775W. The applicant did not consider thermoresistant viruses as a relevant hazard and therefore did not provide any data from direct measurements of the reduction of infectivity of spiked thermoresistant viruses, nor provide data from validation studies undertaken at national level or data from literature supporting the efficacy of the proposed composting standards on thermoresistant viruses. However, thermoresistant viruses should be considered to be a relevant hazard in this context and validation data should have been provided accordingly. The BIOHAZ Panel considers that the evidence provided by the applicant does not demonstrate that the requirements of Annex V, Chapter 3, Section 2 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 are achieved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7404150 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74041502020-08-06 Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network) Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Joseph Bover‐Cid, Sara Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert De Cesare, Alessandra Herman, Lieve Maria Hilbert, Friederike Lindqvist, Roland Nauta, Maarten Peixe, Luisa Ru, Giuseppe Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Suffredini, Elisabetta Escámez, Pablo Fernández Ortiz‐Peláez, Angel Ashe, Seán Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino EFSA J Scientific Opinion Two alternative methods for the production of compost from certain category 3 animal by‐products (catering waste and processed foodstuffs of animal origin) were assessed. The first proposed a minimum temperature of 55°C for 72 h; the second 60°C for 48 h, each with a maximum particle size of 200 mm. The proposed composting processes were assessed by the BIOHAZ Panel for their efficacy to achieve a reduction of 5 log(10) of Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg (775W, H(2)S negative) and a 3 log(10) reduction of the infectivity titre of thermoresistant viruses, such as parvovirus, in the composted material, as set out in Annex V, Chapter 3, Section 2 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011. The assessment of the BIOHAZ Panel exclusively focused on the ABP raw materials (catering waste and processed foodstuffs) intended for human consumption. The applicant did not provide any validation experiments with direct measurement of the reduction of viability of endogenous indicators or spiked surrogate bacteria. However, from thermal inactivation parameters reported in the literature, it can be concluded that the proposed composting standards can achieve at least a 5 log(10) reduction of Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg 775W. The applicant did not consider thermoresistant viruses as a relevant hazard and therefore did not provide any data from direct measurements of the reduction of infectivity of spiked thermoresistant viruses, nor provide data from validation studies undertaken at national level or data from literature supporting the efficacy of the proposed composting standards on thermoresistant viruses. However, thermoresistant viruses should be considered to be a relevant hazard in this context and validation data should have been provided accordingly. The BIOHAZ Panel considers that the evidence provided by the applicant does not demonstrate that the requirements of Annex V, Chapter 3, Section 2 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 are achieved. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7404150/ /pubmed/32774510 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6226 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Joseph Bover‐Cid, Sara Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert De Cesare, Alessandra Herman, Lieve Maria Hilbert, Friederike Lindqvist, Roland Nauta, Maarten Peixe, Luisa Ru, Giuseppe Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Suffredini, Elisabetta Escámez, Pablo Fernández Ortiz‐Peláez, Angel Ashe, Seán Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network) |
title | Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network) |
title_full | Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network) |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network) |
title_short | Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network) |
title_sort | evaluation of alternative methods of tunnel composting (submitted by the european composting network) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7404150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774510 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT koutsoumaniskonstantinos evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT allendeana evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT boltondeclanjoseph evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT bovercidsara evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT chemalymarianne evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT daviesrobert evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT decesarealessandra evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT hermanlievemaria evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT hilbertfriederike evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT lindqvistroland evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT nautamaarten evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT peixeluisa evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT rugiuseppe evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT simmonsmarion evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT skandamispanagiotis evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT suffredinielisabetta evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT escamezpablofernandez evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT ortizpelaezangel evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT ashesean evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork AT alvarezordonezavelino evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork |