Cargando…

Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network)

Two alternative methods for the production of compost from certain category 3 animal by‐products (catering waste and processed foodstuffs of animal origin) were assessed. The first proposed a minimum temperature of 55°C for 72 h; the second 60°C for 48 h, each with a maximum particle size of 200 mm....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos, Allende, Ana, Bolton, Declan Joseph, Bover‐Cid, Sara, Chemaly, Marianne, Davies, Robert, De Cesare, Alessandra, Herman, Lieve Maria, Hilbert, Friederike, Lindqvist, Roland, Nauta, Maarten, Peixe, Luisa, Ru, Giuseppe, Simmons, Marion, Skandamis, Panagiotis, Suffredini, Elisabetta, Escámez, Pablo Fernández, Ortiz‐Peláez, Angel, Ashe, Seán, Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7404150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774510
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6226
_version_ 1783567088415145984
author Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos
Allende, Ana
Bolton, Declan Joseph
Bover‐Cid, Sara
Chemaly, Marianne
Davies, Robert
De Cesare, Alessandra
Herman, Lieve Maria
Hilbert, Friederike
Lindqvist, Roland
Nauta, Maarten
Peixe, Luisa
Ru, Giuseppe
Simmons, Marion
Skandamis, Panagiotis
Suffredini, Elisabetta
Escámez, Pablo Fernández
Ortiz‐Peláez, Angel
Ashe, Seán
Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino
author_facet Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos
Allende, Ana
Bolton, Declan Joseph
Bover‐Cid, Sara
Chemaly, Marianne
Davies, Robert
De Cesare, Alessandra
Herman, Lieve Maria
Hilbert, Friederike
Lindqvist, Roland
Nauta, Maarten
Peixe, Luisa
Ru, Giuseppe
Simmons, Marion
Skandamis, Panagiotis
Suffredini, Elisabetta
Escámez, Pablo Fernández
Ortiz‐Peláez, Angel
Ashe, Seán
Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino
collection PubMed
description Two alternative methods for the production of compost from certain category 3 animal by‐products (catering waste and processed foodstuffs of animal origin) were assessed. The first proposed a minimum temperature of 55°C for 72 h; the second 60°C for 48 h, each with a maximum particle size of 200 mm. The proposed composting processes were assessed by the BIOHAZ Panel for their efficacy to achieve a reduction of 5 log(10) of Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg (775W, H(2)S negative) and a 3 log(10) reduction of the infectivity titre of thermoresistant viruses, such as parvovirus, in the composted material, as set out in Annex V, Chapter 3, Section 2 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011. The assessment of the BIOHAZ Panel exclusively focused on the ABP raw materials (catering waste and processed foodstuffs) intended for human consumption. The applicant did not provide any validation experiments with direct measurement of the reduction of viability of endogenous indicators or spiked surrogate bacteria. However, from thermal inactivation parameters reported in the literature, it can be concluded that the proposed composting standards can achieve at least a 5 log(10) reduction of Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg 775W. The applicant did not consider thermoresistant viruses as a relevant hazard and therefore did not provide any data from direct measurements of the reduction of infectivity of spiked thermoresistant viruses, nor provide data from validation studies undertaken at national level or data from literature supporting the efficacy of the proposed composting standards on thermoresistant viruses. However, thermoresistant viruses should be considered to be a relevant hazard in this context and validation data should have been provided accordingly. The BIOHAZ Panel considers that the evidence provided by the applicant does not demonstrate that the requirements of Annex V, Chapter 3, Section 2 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 are achieved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7404150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74041502020-08-06 Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network) Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Joseph Bover‐Cid, Sara Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert De Cesare, Alessandra Herman, Lieve Maria Hilbert, Friederike Lindqvist, Roland Nauta, Maarten Peixe, Luisa Ru, Giuseppe Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Suffredini, Elisabetta Escámez, Pablo Fernández Ortiz‐Peláez, Angel Ashe, Seán Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino EFSA J Scientific Opinion Two alternative methods for the production of compost from certain category 3 animal by‐products (catering waste and processed foodstuffs of animal origin) were assessed. The first proposed a minimum temperature of 55°C for 72 h; the second 60°C for 48 h, each with a maximum particle size of 200 mm. The proposed composting processes were assessed by the BIOHAZ Panel for their efficacy to achieve a reduction of 5 log(10) of Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg (775W, H(2)S negative) and a 3 log(10) reduction of the infectivity titre of thermoresistant viruses, such as parvovirus, in the composted material, as set out in Annex V, Chapter 3, Section 2 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011. The assessment of the BIOHAZ Panel exclusively focused on the ABP raw materials (catering waste and processed foodstuffs) intended for human consumption. The applicant did not provide any validation experiments with direct measurement of the reduction of viability of endogenous indicators or spiked surrogate bacteria. However, from thermal inactivation parameters reported in the literature, it can be concluded that the proposed composting standards can achieve at least a 5 log(10) reduction of Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg 775W. The applicant did not consider thermoresistant viruses as a relevant hazard and therefore did not provide any data from direct measurements of the reduction of infectivity of spiked thermoresistant viruses, nor provide data from validation studies undertaken at national level or data from literature supporting the efficacy of the proposed composting standards on thermoresistant viruses. However, thermoresistant viruses should be considered to be a relevant hazard in this context and validation data should have been provided accordingly. The BIOHAZ Panel considers that the evidence provided by the applicant does not demonstrate that the requirements of Annex V, Chapter 3, Section 2 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 are achieved. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7404150/ /pubmed/32774510 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6226 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos
Allende, Ana
Bolton, Declan Joseph
Bover‐Cid, Sara
Chemaly, Marianne
Davies, Robert
De Cesare, Alessandra
Herman, Lieve Maria
Hilbert, Friederike
Lindqvist, Roland
Nauta, Maarten
Peixe, Luisa
Ru, Giuseppe
Simmons, Marion
Skandamis, Panagiotis
Suffredini, Elisabetta
Escámez, Pablo Fernández
Ortiz‐Peláez, Angel
Ashe, Seán
Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino
Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network)
title Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network)
title_full Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network)
title_fullStr Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network)
title_short Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Tunnel Composting (submitted by the European Composting Network)
title_sort evaluation of alternative methods of tunnel composting (submitted by the european composting network)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7404150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774510
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6226
work_keys_str_mv AT evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT koutsoumaniskonstantinos evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT allendeana evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT boltondeclanjoseph evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT bovercidsara evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT chemalymarianne evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT daviesrobert evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT decesarealessandra evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT hermanlievemaria evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT hilbertfriederike evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT lindqvistroland evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT nautamaarten evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT peixeluisa evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT rugiuseppe evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT simmonsmarion evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT skandamispanagiotis evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT suffredinielisabetta evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT escamezpablofernandez evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT ortizpelaezangel evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT ashesean evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork
AT alvarezordonezavelino evaluationofalternativemethodsoftunnelcompostingsubmittedbytheeuropeancompostingnetwork