Cargando…

Comparison of Contact Pressures Between Partial and Complete Femoral Osteoplasty Treatment in Hips with CAM Impingement

OBJECTIVES: To determine hip biomechanical properties in three conditions including 1) native cam deformity 2) cam deformity with incomplete resection and 3) cam deformity with complete resection. METHODS: A cadaveric study was performed using 8 frozen hemi-pelvises with cam-type deformity (alpha an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suppauksorn, Sunikom, Beck, Edward, Cancienne, Jourdan, Shewman, Elizabeth, Chahla, Jorge, Krivicich, Laura, Nho, Shane, Rasio, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7405236/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00422
_version_ 1783567224284381184
author Suppauksorn, Sunikom
Beck, Edward
Cancienne, Jourdan
Shewman, Elizabeth
Chahla, Jorge
Krivicich, Laura
Nho, Shane
Rasio, Jonathan
author_facet Suppauksorn, Sunikom
Beck, Edward
Cancienne, Jourdan
Shewman, Elizabeth
Chahla, Jorge
Krivicich, Laura
Nho, Shane
Rasio, Jonathan
author_sort Suppauksorn, Sunikom
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine hip biomechanical properties in three conditions including 1) native cam deformity 2) cam deformity with incomplete resection and 3) cam deformity with complete resection. METHODS: A cadaveric study was performed using 8 frozen hemi-pelvises with cam-type deformity (alpha angle >55 degrees) with an intact labrum. Intraarticular pressure maps were produced for each specimen under the following conditions: 1) native cam deformity, 2) cam deformity with incomplete resection and 3) cam deformity with complete resection. A 5.5-mm burr was used to resect the lateral portion of the cam deformity. The specimen was placed in a custom-designed jig in the MTS electromechanical test system to create pressure and area map measurements. In each condition, contact pressure, contact area, and peak force within a region-of-interest (ROI) were obtained. Repeated measurements were performed three times in each condition and the average value of each parameter was used for statistical analysis. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare biomechanical parameters between three conditions. RESULTS: Contact pressures averages of hips with complete resection of cam lesions were significantly lower when compared to averages of hips with incomplete femoral cam lesion and intact cam deformity (2.48+0.56 kg/cm3 vs 2.32+0.50 kg/cm3 vs 2.02+0.54 kg/cm3, respectively; p-value<0.01). Percentage reduction of contact pressure in the complete and incomplete resection groups compared to the native CAM deformity groups were 18.49% and 1.58%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in contact pressures between the incomplete resection and unoperated group. Contact area and peak force showed no statistically significant differences across three conditions. CONCLUSION: There are lower intraarticular hip contract pressures in complete resection of the cam lesions when compared to an incomplete resection and intact hip without resection. These observations underscore the importance of ensuring complete resection of femoral cam lesions in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7405236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74052362020-08-19 Comparison of Contact Pressures Between Partial and Complete Femoral Osteoplasty Treatment in Hips with CAM Impingement Suppauksorn, Sunikom Beck, Edward Cancienne, Jourdan Shewman, Elizabeth Chahla, Jorge Krivicich, Laura Nho, Shane Rasio, Jonathan Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: To determine hip biomechanical properties in three conditions including 1) native cam deformity 2) cam deformity with incomplete resection and 3) cam deformity with complete resection. METHODS: A cadaveric study was performed using 8 frozen hemi-pelvises with cam-type deformity (alpha angle >55 degrees) with an intact labrum. Intraarticular pressure maps were produced for each specimen under the following conditions: 1) native cam deformity, 2) cam deformity with incomplete resection and 3) cam deformity with complete resection. A 5.5-mm burr was used to resect the lateral portion of the cam deformity. The specimen was placed in a custom-designed jig in the MTS electromechanical test system to create pressure and area map measurements. In each condition, contact pressure, contact area, and peak force within a region-of-interest (ROI) were obtained. Repeated measurements were performed three times in each condition and the average value of each parameter was used for statistical analysis. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare biomechanical parameters between three conditions. RESULTS: Contact pressures averages of hips with complete resection of cam lesions were significantly lower when compared to averages of hips with incomplete femoral cam lesion and intact cam deformity (2.48+0.56 kg/cm3 vs 2.32+0.50 kg/cm3 vs 2.02+0.54 kg/cm3, respectively; p-value<0.01). Percentage reduction of contact pressure in the complete and incomplete resection groups compared to the native CAM deformity groups were 18.49% and 1.58%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in contact pressures between the incomplete resection and unoperated group. Contact area and peak force showed no statistically significant differences across three conditions. CONCLUSION: There are lower intraarticular hip contract pressures in complete resection of the cam lesions when compared to an incomplete resection and intact hip without resection. These observations underscore the importance of ensuring complete resection of femoral cam lesions in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. SAGE Publications 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7405236/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00422 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Suppauksorn, Sunikom
Beck, Edward
Cancienne, Jourdan
Shewman, Elizabeth
Chahla, Jorge
Krivicich, Laura
Nho, Shane
Rasio, Jonathan
Comparison of Contact Pressures Between Partial and Complete Femoral Osteoplasty Treatment in Hips with CAM Impingement
title Comparison of Contact Pressures Between Partial and Complete Femoral Osteoplasty Treatment in Hips with CAM Impingement
title_full Comparison of Contact Pressures Between Partial and Complete Femoral Osteoplasty Treatment in Hips with CAM Impingement
title_fullStr Comparison of Contact Pressures Between Partial and Complete Femoral Osteoplasty Treatment in Hips with CAM Impingement
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Contact Pressures Between Partial and Complete Femoral Osteoplasty Treatment in Hips with CAM Impingement
title_short Comparison of Contact Pressures Between Partial and Complete Femoral Osteoplasty Treatment in Hips with CAM Impingement
title_sort comparison of contact pressures between partial and complete femoral osteoplasty treatment in hips with cam impingement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7405236/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00422
work_keys_str_mv AT suppauksornsunikom comparisonofcontactpressuresbetweenpartialandcompletefemoralosteoplastytreatmentinhipswithcamimpingement
AT beckedward comparisonofcontactpressuresbetweenpartialandcompletefemoralosteoplastytreatmentinhipswithcamimpingement
AT canciennejourdan comparisonofcontactpressuresbetweenpartialandcompletefemoralosteoplastytreatmentinhipswithcamimpingement
AT shewmanelizabeth comparisonofcontactpressuresbetweenpartialandcompletefemoralosteoplastytreatmentinhipswithcamimpingement
AT chahlajorge comparisonofcontactpressuresbetweenpartialandcompletefemoralosteoplastytreatmentinhipswithcamimpingement
AT krivicichlaura comparisonofcontactpressuresbetweenpartialandcompletefemoralosteoplastytreatmentinhipswithcamimpingement
AT nhoshane comparisonofcontactpressuresbetweenpartialandcompletefemoralosteoplastytreatmentinhipswithcamimpingement
AT rasiojonathan comparisonofcontactpressuresbetweenpartialandcompletefemoralosteoplastytreatmentinhipswithcamimpingement