Cargando…
Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) is one of the techniques feasible for the treatment of intramural myoma. This technique is reported to be difficult when large fibroids are involved because of excessive blood loss during surgery. Skillful and fast suturing appears to be associated with reduc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7405452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32758222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01030-5 |
_version_ | 1783567253047869440 |
---|---|
author | Nakayama, Kentaro Razia, Sultana Ishikawa, Masako Yamashita, Hitomi Ishibashi, Tomoka Sasamori, Hiroki Sawada, Kiyoka Kurose, Sonomi Sato, Seiya Kyo, Satoru |
author_facet | Nakayama, Kentaro Razia, Sultana Ishikawa, Masako Yamashita, Hitomi Ishibashi, Tomoka Sasamori, Hiroki Sawada, Kiyoka Kurose, Sonomi Sato, Seiya Kyo, Satoru |
author_sort | Nakayama, Kentaro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) is one of the techniques feasible for the treatment of intramural myoma. This technique is reported to be difficult when large fibroids are involved because of excessive blood loss during surgery. Skillful and fast suturing appears to be associated with reduced blood loss during LM. In this study we compared the surgical outcomes of using bidirectional Stratafix® barbed suture versus conventional suture during LM. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent LM for the treatment of intramural myoma in our institution between 2015 and 2020. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the technique of suturing during LM: Group 1 comprised patients in whom Stratafix® barbed suture was used (n = 29), and group 2 comprised those in whom conventional suture was used (n = 15). Data of patient age, myoma size, the number of myoma nodes, hemoglobin levels, total operation time, total suturing time, and blood loss during surgery were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: No significant differences in age (p = 0.463) or myoma size (P = 0.373) were observed between the 2 groups. Operation time (P = 0.0104), suturing time (P = 0.007), and blood loss (P = 0.0375) during surgery were significantly less with Stratafix® barbed suture than with conventional suture. No patient required intraoperative transfusion or conversion to laparotomy. CONCLUSION: The use of bidirectional barbed suture reduces operation time, suturing time, and blood loss. As these new sutures have barbs, no knot-tying is required; thus, continuous suturing becomes very simple and maintaining hemostasis is easy. Unskilled gynecological surgeons who apply this suture technique can also perform LM easily. As the bidirectional barbed suture has multiple points of fixation, this suture technique can reapproximate tissue securely, which reduces the chances of reoperation because of proper suture knotting. Therefore, bidirectional Stratafix® barbed sutures could be an optimal and efficient alternative to conventional sutures for use by gynecological surgeons in Japan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7405452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74054522020-08-07 Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study Nakayama, Kentaro Razia, Sultana Ishikawa, Masako Yamashita, Hitomi Ishibashi, Tomoka Sasamori, Hiroki Sawada, Kiyoka Kurose, Sonomi Sato, Seiya Kyo, Satoru BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) is one of the techniques feasible for the treatment of intramural myoma. This technique is reported to be difficult when large fibroids are involved because of excessive blood loss during surgery. Skillful and fast suturing appears to be associated with reduced blood loss during LM. In this study we compared the surgical outcomes of using bidirectional Stratafix® barbed suture versus conventional suture during LM. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent LM for the treatment of intramural myoma in our institution between 2015 and 2020. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the technique of suturing during LM: Group 1 comprised patients in whom Stratafix® barbed suture was used (n = 29), and group 2 comprised those in whom conventional suture was used (n = 15). Data of patient age, myoma size, the number of myoma nodes, hemoglobin levels, total operation time, total suturing time, and blood loss during surgery were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: No significant differences in age (p = 0.463) or myoma size (P = 0.373) were observed between the 2 groups. Operation time (P = 0.0104), suturing time (P = 0.007), and blood loss (P = 0.0375) during surgery were significantly less with Stratafix® barbed suture than with conventional suture. No patient required intraoperative transfusion or conversion to laparotomy. CONCLUSION: The use of bidirectional barbed suture reduces operation time, suturing time, and blood loss. As these new sutures have barbs, no knot-tying is required; thus, continuous suturing becomes very simple and maintaining hemostasis is easy. Unskilled gynecological surgeons who apply this suture technique can also perform LM easily. As the bidirectional barbed suture has multiple points of fixation, this suture technique can reapproximate tissue securely, which reduces the chances of reoperation because of proper suture knotting. Therefore, bidirectional Stratafix® barbed sutures could be an optimal and efficient alternative to conventional sutures for use by gynecological surgeons in Japan. BioMed Central 2020-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7405452/ /pubmed/32758222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01030-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nakayama, Kentaro Razia, Sultana Ishikawa, Masako Yamashita, Hitomi Ishibashi, Tomoka Sasamori, Hiroki Sawada, Kiyoka Kurose, Sonomi Sato, Seiya Kyo, Satoru Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study |
title | Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study |
title_full | Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study |
title_short | Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study |
title_sort | comparison between bidirectional stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7405452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32758222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01030-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakayamakentaro comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy AT raziasultana comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy AT ishikawamasako comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy AT yamashitahitomi comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy AT ishibashitomoka comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy AT sasamorihiroki comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy AT sawadakiyoka comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy AT kurosesonomi comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy AT satoseiya comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy AT kyosatoru comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy |