Cargando…

Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) is one of the techniques feasible for the treatment of intramural myoma. This technique is reported to be difficult when large fibroids are involved because of excessive blood loss during surgery. Skillful and fast suturing appears to be associated with reduc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakayama, Kentaro, Razia, Sultana, Ishikawa, Masako, Yamashita, Hitomi, Ishibashi, Tomoka, Sasamori, Hiroki, Sawada, Kiyoka, Kurose, Sonomi, Sato, Seiya, Kyo, Satoru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7405452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32758222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01030-5
_version_ 1783567253047869440
author Nakayama, Kentaro
Razia, Sultana
Ishikawa, Masako
Yamashita, Hitomi
Ishibashi, Tomoka
Sasamori, Hiroki
Sawada, Kiyoka
Kurose, Sonomi
Sato, Seiya
Kyo, Satoru
author_facet Nakayama, Kentaro
Razia, Sultana
Ishikawa, Masako
Yamashita, Hitomi
Ishibashi, Tomoka
Sasamori, Hiroki
Sawada, Kiyoka
Kurose, Sonomi
Sato, Seiya
Kyo, Satoru
author_sort Nakayama, Kentaro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) is one of the techniques feasible for the treatment of intramural myoma. This technique is reported to be difficult when large fibroids are involved because of excessive blood loss during surgery. Skillful and fast suturing appears to be associated with reduced blood loss during LM. In this study we compared the surgical outcomes of using bidirectional Stratafix® barbed suture versus conventional suture during LM. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent LM for the treatment of intramural myoma in our institution between 2015 and 2020. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the technique of suturing during LM: Group 1 comprised patients in whom Stratafix® barbed suture was used (n = 29), and group 2 comprised those in whom conventional suture was used (n = 15). Data of patient age, myoma size, the number of myoma nodes, hemoglobin levels, total operation time, total suturing time, and blood loss during surgery were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: No significant differences in age (p = 0.463) or myoma size (P = 0.373) were observed between the 2 groups. Operation time (P = 0.0104), suturing time (P = 0.007), and blood loss (P = 0.0375) during surgery were significantly less with Stratafix® barbed suture than with conventional suture. No patient required intraoperative transfusion or conversion to laparotomy. CONCLUSION: The use of bidirectional barbed suture reduces operation time, suturing time, and blood loss. As these new sutures have barbs, no knot-tying is required; thus, continuous suturing becomes very simple and maintaining hemostasis is easy. Unskilled gynecological surgeons who apply this suture technique can also perform LM easily. As the bidirectional barbed suture has multiple points of fixation, this suture technique can reapproximate tissue securely, which reduces the chances of reoperation because of proper suture knotting. Therefore, bidirectional Stratafix® barbed sutures could be an optimal and efficient alternative to conventional sutures for use by gynecological surgeons in Japan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7405452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74054522020-08-07 Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study Nakayama, Kentaro Razia, Sultana Ishikawa, Masako Yamashita, Hitomi Ishibashi, Tomoka Sasamori, Hiroki Sawada, Kiyoka Kurose, Sonomi Sato, Seiya Kyo, Satoru BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) is one of the techniques feasible for the treatment of intramural myoma. This technique is reported to be difficult when large fibroids are involved because of excessive blood loss during surgery. Skillful and fast suturing appears to be associated with reduced blood loss during LM. In this study we compared the surgical outcomes of using bidirectional Stratafix® barbed suture versus conventional suture during LM. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent LM for the treatment of intramural myoma in our institution between 2015 and 2020. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the technique of suturing during LM: Group 1 comprised patients in whom Stratafix® barbed suture was used (n = 29), and group 2 comprised those in whom conventional suture was used (n = 15). Data of patient age, myoma size, the number of myoma nodes, hemoglobin levels, total operation time, total suturing time, and blood loss during surgery were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: No significant differences in age (p = 0.463) or myoma size (P = 0.373) were observed between the 2 groups. Operation time (P = 0.0104), suturing time (P = 0.007), and blood loss (P = 0.0375) during surgery were significantly less with Stratafix® barbed suture than with conventional suture. No patient required intraoperative transfusion or conversion to laparotomy. CONCLUSION: The use of bidirectional barbed suture reduces operation time, suturing time, and blood loss. As these new sutures have barbs, no knot-tying is required; thus, continuous suturing becomes very simple and maintaining hemostasis is easy. Unskilled gynecological surgeons who apply this suture technique can also perform LM easily. As the bidirectional barbed suture has multiple points of fixation, this suture technique can reapproximate tissue securely, which reduces the chances of reoperation because of proper suture knotting. Therefore, bidirectional Stratafix® barbed sutures could be an optimal and efficient alternative to conventional sutures for use by gynecological surgeons in Japan. BioMed Central 2020-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7405452/ /pubmed/32758222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01030-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nakayama, Kentaro
Razia, Sultana
Ishikawa, Masako
Yamashita, Hitomi
Ishibashi, Tomoka
Sasamori, Hiroki
Sawada, Kiyoka
Kurose, Sonomi
Sato, Seiya
Kyo, Satoru
Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study
title Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study
title_full Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study
title_short Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study
title_sort comparison between bidirectional stratafix(®) barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7405452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32758222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01030-5
work_keys_str_mv AT nakayamakentaro comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT raziasultana comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT ishikawamasako comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT yamashitahitomi comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT ishibashitomoka comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT sasamorihiroki comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT sawadakiyoka comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT kurosesonomi comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT satoseiya comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT kyosatoru comparisonbetweenbidirectionalstratafixbarbedsutureandconventionalsutureinlaparoscopicmyomectomyaretrospectivestudy