Cargando…
Top-down modulation of gaze capture: Feature similarity, optimal tuning, or tuning to relative features?
It is well-known that we can tune attention to specific features (e.g., colors). Originally, it was believed that attention would always be tuned to the exact feature value of the sought-after target (e.g., orange). However, subsequent studies showed that selection is often geared towards target-dis...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7405730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32282888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.4.6 |
_version_ | 1783567306413047808 |
---|---|
author | York, Ashley Becker, Stefanie I. |
author_facet | York, Ashley Becker, Stefanie I. |
author_sort | York, Ashley |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is well-known that we can tune attention to specific features (e.g., colors). Originally, it was believed that attention would always be tuned to the exact feature value of the sought-after target (e.g., orange). However, subsequent studies showed that selection is often geared towards target-dissimilar items, which was variably attributed to (1) tuning attention to the relative target feature that distinguishes the target from other items in the surround (e.g., reddest item; relational tuning), (2) tuning attention to a shifted target feature that allows more optimal target selection (e.g., reddish orange; optimal tuning), or (3) broad attentional tuning and selection of the most salient item that is still similar to the target (combined similarity/saliency). The present study used a color search task and assessed gaze capture by differently coloured distractors to distinguish between the three accounts. The results of the first experiment showed that a very target-dissimilar distractor that matched the relative color of the target but was outside of the area of optimal tuning still captured very strongly. As shown by a control condition and a control experiment, bottom-up saliency modulated capture only weakly, ruling out a combined similarity-saliency account. With this, the results support the relational account that attention is tuned to the relative target feature (e.g., reddest), not an optimal feature value or the target feature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7405730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74057302020-08-19 Top-down modulation of gaze capture: Feature similarity, optimal tuning, or tuning to relative features? York, Ashley Becker, Stefanie I. J Vis Article It is well-known that we can tune attention to specific features (e.g., colors). Originally, it was believed that attention would always be tuned to the exact feature value of the sought-after target (e.g., orange). However, subsequent studies showed that selection is often geared towards target-dissimilar items, which was variably attributed to (1) tuning attention to the relative target feature that distinguishes the target from other items in the surround (e.g., reddest item; relational tuning), (2) tuning attention to a shifted target feature that allows more optimal target selection (e.g., reddish orange; optimal tuning), or (3) broad attentional tuning and selection of the most salient item that is still similar to the target (combined similarity/saliency). The present study used a color search task and assessed gaze capture by differently coloured distractors to distinguish between the three accounts. The results of the first experiment showed that a very target-dissimilar distractor that matched the relative color of the target but was outside of the area of optimal tuning still captured very strongly. As shown by a control condition and a control experiment, bottom-up saliency modulated capture only weakly, ruling out a combined similarity-saliency account. With this, the results support the relational account that attention is tuned to the relative target feature (e.g., reddest), not an optimal feature value or the target feature. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7405730/ /pubmed/32282888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.4.6 Text en Copyright 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article York, Ashley Becker, Stefanie I. Top-down modulation of gaze capture: Feature similarity, optimal tuning, or tuning to relative features? |
title | Top-down modulation of gaze capture: Feature similarity, optimal tuning, or tuning to relative features? |
title_full | Top-down modulation of gaze capture: Feature similarity, optimal tuning, or tuning to relative features? |
title_fullStr | Top-down modulation of gaze capture: Feature similarity, optimal tuning, or tuning to relative features? |
title_full_unstemmed | Top-down modulation of gaze capture: Feature similarity, optimal tuning, or tuning to relative features? |
title_short | Top-down modulation of gaze capture: Feature similarity, optimal tuning, or tuning to relative features? |
title_sort | top-down modulation of gaze capture: feature similarity, optimal tuning, or tuning to relative features? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7405730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32282888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.4.6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yorkashley topdownmodulationofgazecapturefeaturesimilarityoptimaltuningortuningtorelativefeatures AT beckerstefaniei topdownmodulationofgazecapturefeaturesimilarityoptimaltuningortuningtorelativefeatures |