Cargando…
Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data
BACKGROUND: This is a multi-method, in-depth, three part qualitative study exploring the regulation and practice of secondary research with tissue and data in a high-income country. We explore and compare the perspectives of researchers, research ethics committees (RECs) and other relevant professio...
Autores principales: | Ballantyne, Angela, Moore, Andrew, Bartholomew, Karen, Aagaard, Nic |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32756563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235618 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Consent requirements for research with human tissue: Swiss ethics committee members disagree
por: Colledge, Flora, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree?
por: Tripp, John H, et al.
Publicado: (1995) -
Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree?
por: Hotopf, Matthew
Publicado: (1995) -
Correction to: Consent requirements for research with human tissue: Swiss ethics committee members disagree
por: Colledge, Flora, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree with Each Other?
por: Foster, Claire
Publicado: (1995)