Cargando…

Is there a link between very early changes of primary and secondary lymphoid organs in (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI and treatment response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy?

Response assessment or prediction to checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CIT) is an unsolved problem in current routine diagnostics of patients with melanoma. Here, we evaluated very early changes of primary and secondary lymphoid organs under CIT in multiparametric [(18)F]-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose-posi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seith, Ferdinand, Forschner, Andrea, Weide, Benjamin, Gückel, Brigitte, Schwartz, Martin, Schwenck, Johannes, Othman, Ahmed E, Fenchel, Matthias, Garbe, Claus, Nikolaou, Konstantin, Schwenzer, Nina, la Fougère, Christian, Pfannenberg, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32753543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000656
_version_ 1783567380277886976
author Seith, Ferdinand
Forschner, Andrea
Weide, Benjamin
Gückel, Brigitte
Schwartz, Martin
Schwenck, Johannes
Othman, Ahmed E
Fenchel, Matthias
Garbe, Claus
Nikolaou, Konstantin
Schwenzer, Nina
la Fougère, Christian
Pfannenberg, Christina
author_facet Seith, Ferdinand
Forschner, Andrea
Weide, Benjamin
Gückel, Brigitte
Schwartz, Martin
Schwenck, Johannes
Othman, Ahmed E
Fenchel, Matthias
Garbe, Claus
Nikolaou, Konstantin
Schwenzer, Nina
la Fougère, Christian
Pfannenberg, Christina
author_sort Seith, Ferdinand
collection PubMed
description Response assessment or prediction to checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CIT) is an unsolved problem in current routine diagnostics of patients with melanoma. Here, we evaluated very early changes of primary and secondary lymphoid organs under CIT in multiparametric [(18)F]-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET)/MRI as possible predictors of treatment response and investigated their correlation with baseline blood immune biomarkers. Between October 2014 and November 2017, 17 patients with unresectable melanoma (8 females; 65±11 years) undergoing CIT were prospectively evaluated using whole-body (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI before CIT start (t(0)), 2 weeks (t(1)) and 3 months after CIT initiation (t(2)). At each time point, the volume, the (18)F-FDG-uptake and the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the spleen as well as the (18)F-FDG uptake of the bone marrow were assessed. Relative lymphocyte count (RLC), relative eosinophil count (REC) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were assessed at baseline. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours modified for immune-based therapeutics (iRECIST) and decisions from an interdisciplinary tumor board were used for treatment response evaluation at t(2). iRECIST was compared with PET response criteria in solid tumors for image-based response evaluation at different time points. Comparative analysis was conducted with Mann-Whitney U test with false discovery rate correction for multiple testing and correlation coefficients were computed. In lymphoid organs, significant differences (p<0.05) between responders (9/17) and non-responders were found for the (18)F-FDG-uptake in the spleen at t(1) and the increase of the uptake t(1)-t(0) (responders/non-responders: standardized uptake value lean body mass 1.19/0.93; +49%/−1%). The best correlation coefficients to baseline biomarkers were found for the (18)F-FDG-uptake in the spleen at t(1): NLR, r=−0.46; RLC, r=0.43; REC, r=0.58 (p<0.05), respectively. Compared with the non-responder group, the responder group showed marked increases also in the volume of the spleen (+22%/+10%), the (18)F-FDG-uptake of bone marrow (+31%/−9%) at t(1) and the ADCmean at t(2) (+46%/+15%) compared with t(0), however, not reaching significance. Our findings indicate that an effective systemic immune response in patients undergoing CIT can be detected as a significantly increased spleen activity in (18)F-FDG-PET as early as 2 weeks after treatment initiation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03132090, DRKS00013925.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7406110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74061102020-08-17 Is there a link between very early changes of primary and secondary lymphoid organs in (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI and treatment response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy? Seith, Ferdinand Forschner, Andrea Weide, Benjamin Gückel, Brigitte Schwartz, Martin Schwenck, Johannes Othman, Ahmed E Fenchel, Matthias Garbe, Claus Nikolaou, Konstantin Schwenzer, Nina la Fougère, Christian Pfannenberg, Christina J Immunother Cancer Immunotherapy Biomarkers Response assessment or prediction to checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CIT) is an unsolved problem in current routine diagnostics of patients with melanoma. Here, we evaluated very early changes of primary and secondary lymphoid organs under CIT in multiparametric [(18)F]-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET)/MRI as possible predictors of treatment response and investigated their correlation with baseline blood immune biomarkers. Between October 2014 and November 2017, 17 patients with unresectable melanoma (8 females; 65±11 years) undergoing CIT were prospectively evaluated using whole-body (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI before CIT start (t(0)), 2 weeks (t(1)) and 3 months after CIT initiation (t(2)). At each time point, the volume, the (18)F-FDG-uptake and the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the spleen as well as the (18)F-FDG uptake of the bone marrow were assessed. Relative lymphocyte count (RLC), relative eosinophil count (REC) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were assessed at baseline. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours modified for immune-based therapeutics (iRECIST) and decisions from an interdisciplinary tumor board were used for treatment response evaluation at t(2). iRECIST was compared with PET response criteria in solid tumors for image-based response evaluation at different time points. Comparative analysis was conducted with Mann-Whitney U test with false discovery rate correction for multiple testing and correlation coefficients were computed. In lymphoid organs, significant differences (p<0.05) between responders (9/17) and non-responders were found for the (18)F-FDG-uptake in the spleen at t(1) and the increase of the uptake t(1)-t(0) (responders/non-responders: standardized uptake value lean body mass 1.19/0.93; +49%/−1%). The best correlation coefficients to baseline biomarkers were found for the (18)F-FDG-uptake in the spleen at t(1): NLR, r=−0.46; RLC, r=0.43; REC, r=0.58 (p<0.05), respectively. Compared with the non-responder group, the responder group showed marked increases also in the volume of the spleen (+22%/+10%), the (18)F-FDG-uptake of bone marrow (+31%/−9%) at t(1) and the ADCmean at t(2) (+46%/+15%) compared with t(0), however, not reaching significance. Our findings indicate that an effective systemic immune response in patients undergoing CIT can be detected as a significantly increased spleen activity in (18)F-FDG-PET as early as 2 weeks after treatment initiation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03132090, DRKS00013925. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7406110/ /pubmed/32753543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000656 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Immunotherapy Biomarkers
Seith, Ferdinand
Forschner, Andrea
Weide, Benjamin
Gückel, Brigitte
Schwartz, Martin
Schwenck, Johannes
Othman, Ahmed E
Fenchel, Matthias
Garbe, Claus
Nikolaou, Konstantin
Schwenzer, Nina
la Fougère, Christian
Pfannenberg, Christina
Is there a link between very early changes of primary and secondary lymphoid organs in (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI and treatment response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy?
title Is there a link between very early changes of primary and secondary lymphoid organs in (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI and treatment response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy?
title_full Is there a link between very early changes of primary and secondary lymphoid organs in (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI and treatment response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy?
title_fullStr Is there a link between very early changes of primary and secondary lymphoid organs in (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI and treatment response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy?
title_full_unstemmed Is there a link between very early changes of primary and secondary lymphoid organs in (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI and treatment response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy?
title_short Is there a link between very early changes of primary and secondary lymphoid organs in (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI and treatment response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy?
title_sort is there a link between very early changes of primary and secondary lymphoid organs in (18)f-fdg-pet/mri and treatment response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy?
topic Immunotherapy Biomarkers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32753543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000656
work_keys_str_mv AT seithferdinand istherealinkbetweenveryearlychangesofprimaryandsecondarylymphoidorgansin18ffdgpetmriandtreatmentresponsetocheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT forschnerandrea istherealinkbetweenveryearlychangesofprimaryandsecondarylymphoidorgansin18ffdgpetmriandtreatmentresponsetocheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT weidebenjamin istherealinkbetweenveryearlychangesofprimaryandsecondarylymphoidorgansin18ffdgpetmriandtreatmentresponsetocheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT guckelbrigitte istherealinkbetweenveryearlychangesofprimaryandsecondarylymphoidorgansin18ffdgpetmriandtreatmentresponsetocheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT schwartzmartin istherealinkbetweenveryearlychangesofprimaryandsecondarylymphoidorgansin18ffdgpetmriandtreatmentresponsetocheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT schwenckjohannes istherealinkbetweenveryearlychangesofprimaryandsecondarylymphoidorgansin18ffdgpetmriandtreatmentresponsetocheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT othmanahmede istherealinkbetweenveryearlychangesofprimaryandsecondarylymphoidorgansin18ffdgpetmriandtreatmentresponsetocheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT fenchelmatthias istherealinkbetweenveryearlychangesofprimaryandsecondarylymphoidorgansin18ffdgpetmriandtreatmentresponsetocheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT garbeclaus istherealinkbetweenveryearlychangesofprimaryandsecondarylymphoidorgansin18ffdgpetmriandtreatmentresponsetocheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT nikolaoukonstantin istherealinkbetweenveryearlychangesofprimaryandsecondarylymphoidorgansin18ffdgpetmriandtreatmentresponsetocheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT schwenzernina istherealinkbetweenveryearlychangesofprimaryandsecondarylymphoidorgansin18ffdgpetmriandtreatmentresponsetocheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT lafougerechristian istherealinkbetweenveryearlychangesofprimaryandsecondarylymphoidorgansin18ffdgpetmriandtreatmentresponsetocheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT pfannenbergchristina istherealinkbetweenveryearlychangesofprimaryandsecondarylymphoidorgansin18ffdgpetmriandtreatmentresponsetocheckpointinhibitortherapy