Cargando…
Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study
OBJECTIVE: There are widespread shortages of personal protective equipment as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Reprocessing filtering facepiece particle (FFP)-type respirators may provide an alternative solution in keeping healthcare professionals safe. DESIGN: Prospective, bench-to-bedside. SETTI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32753454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039454 |
_version_ | 1783567380731920384 |
---|---|
author | Harskamp, Ralf E van Straten, Bart Bouman, Jonathan van Maltha-van Santvoort, Bernadette van den Dobbelsteen, John J van der Sijp, Joost RM Horeman, Tim |
author_facet | Harskamp, Ralf E van Straten, Bart Bouman, Jonathan van Maltha-van Santvoort, Bernadette van den Dobbelsteen, John J van der Sijp, Joost RM Horeman, Tim |
author_sort | Harskamp, Ralf E |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: There are widespread shortages of personal protective equipment as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Reprocessing filtering facepiece particle (FFP)-type respirators may provide an alternative solution in keeping healthcare professionals safe. DESIGN: Prospective, bench-to-bedside. SETTING: A primary care-based study using FFP-2 respirators without exhalation valve (3M Aura 1862+ (20 samples), Maco Pharma ZZM002 (14 samples)), FFP-2 respirators with valve (3M Aura 9322+ (six samples) and San Huei 2920V (16 samples)) and valved FFP type 3 respirators (Safe Worker 1016 (10 samples)). INTERVENTIONS: All masks were reprocessed using a medical autoclave (17 min at 121°C with 34 min total cycle time) and subsequently tested up to three times whether these respirators retained their integrity (seal check and pressure drop) and ability to filter small particles (0.3–5.0 µm) in the laboratory using a particle penetration test. RESULTS: We tested 33 respirators and 66 samples for filter capacity. All FFP-2 respirators retained their shape, whereas half of the decontaminated FFP-3 respirators showed deformities and failed the seal check. The filtering capacity of the 3M Aura 1862 was best retained after one, two and three decontamination cycles (0.3 µm: 99.3%±0.3% (new) vs 97.0±1.3, 94.2±1.3% or 94.4±1.6; p<0.001). Of the other FFP-2 respirators, the San Huei 2920 V had 95.5%±0.7% at baseline vs 92.3%±1.7% vs 90.0±0.7 after one-time and two-time decontaminations, respectively (p<0.001). The tested FFP-3 respirator (Safe Worker 1016) had a filter capacity of 96.5%±0.7% at baseline and 60.3%±5.7% after one-time decontamination (p<0.001). Breathing and pressure resistance tests indicated no relevant pressure changes between respirators that were used once, twice or thrice. CONCLUSION: This small single-centre study shows that selected FFP-2 respirators may be reprocessed for use in primary care, as the tested masks retain their shape, ability to retain particles and breathing comfort after decontamination using a medical autoclave. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7406112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74061122020-08-17 Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study Harskamp, Ralf E van Straten, Bart Bouman, Jonathan van Maltha-van Santvoort, Bernadette van den Dobbelsteen, John J van der Sijp, Joost RM Horeman, Tim BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: There are widespread shortages of personal protective equipment as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Reprocessing filtering facepiece particle (FFP)-type respirators may provide an alternative solution in keeping healthcare professionals safe. DESIGN: Prospective, bench-to-bedside. SETTING: A primary care-based study using FFP-2 respirators without exhalation valve (3M Aura 1862+ (20 samples), Maco Pharma ZZM002 (14 samples)), FFP-2 respirators with valve (3M Aura 9322+ (six samples) and San Huei 2920V (16 samples)) and valved FFP type 3 respirators (Safe Worker 1016 (10 samples)). INTERVENTIONS: All masks were reprocessed using a medical autoclave (17 min at 121°C with 34 min total cycle time) and subsequently tested up to three times whether these respirators retained their integrity (seal check and pressure drop) and ability to filter small particles (0.3–5.0 µm) in the laboratory using a particle penetration test. RESULTS: We tested 33 respirators and 66 samples for filter capacity. All FFP-2 respirators retained their shape, whereas half of the decontaminated FFP-3 respirators showed deformities and failed the seal check. The filtering capacity of the 3M Aura 1862 was best retained after one, two and three decontamination cycles (0.3 µm: 99.3%±0.3% (new) vs 97.0±1.3, 94.2±1.3% or 94.4±1.6; p<0.001). Of the other FFP-2 respirators, the San Huei 2920 V had 95.5%±0.7% at baseline vs 92.3%±1.7% vs 90.0±0.7 after one-time and two-time decontaminations, respectively (p<0.001). The tested FFP-3 respirator (Safe Worker 1016) had a filter capacity of 96.5%±0.7% at baseline and 60.3%±5.7% after one-time decontamination (p<0.001). Breathing and pressure resistance tests indicated no relevant pressure changes between respirators that were used once, twice or thrice. CONCLUSION: This small single-centre study shows that selected FFP-2 respirators may be reprocessed for use in primary care, as the tested masks retain their shape, ability to retain particles and breathing comfort after decontamination using a medical autoclave. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7406112/ /pubmed/32753454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039454 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Harskamp, Ralf E van Straten, Bart Bouman, Jonathan van Maltha-van Santvoort, Bernadette van den Dobbelsteen, John J van der Sijp, Joost RM Horeman, Tim Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study |
title | Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study |
title_full | Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study |
title_fullStr | Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study |
title_full_unstemmed | Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study |
title_short | Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study |
title_sort | reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32753454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harskampralfe reprocessingfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsinprimarycareusingmedicalautoclaveprospectivebenchtobedsidesinglecentrestudy AT vanstratenbart reprocessingfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsinprimarycareusingmedicalautoclaveprospectivebenchtobedsidesinglecentrestudy AT boumanjonathan reprocessingfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsinprimarycareusingmedicalautoclaveprospectivebenchtobedsidesinglecentrestudy AT vanmalthavansantvoortbernadette reprocessingfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsinprimarycareusingmedicalautoclaveprospectivebenchtobedsidesinglecentrestudy AT vandendobbelsteenjohnj reprocessingfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsinprimarycareusingmedicalautoclaveprospectivebenchtobedsidesinglecentrestudy AT vandersijpjoostrm reprocessingfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsinprimarycareusingmedicalautoclaveprospectivebenchtobedsidesinglecentrestudy AT horemantim reprocessingfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsinprimarycareusingmedicalautoclaveprospectivebenchtobedsidesinglecentrestudy |