Cargando…

Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study

OBJECTIVE: There are widespread shortages of personal protective equipment as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Reprocessing filtering facepiece particle (FFP)-type respirators may provide an alternative solution in keeping healthcare professionals safe. DESIGN: Prospective, bench-to-bedside. SETTI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harskamp, Ralf E, van Straten, Bart, Bouman, Jonathan, van Maltha-van Santvoort, Bernadette, van den Dobbelsteen, John J, van der Sijp, Joost RM, Horeman, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32753454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039454
_version_ 1783567380731920384
author Harskamp, Ralf E
van Straten, Bart
Bouman, Jonathan
van Maltha-van Santvoort, Bernadette
van den Dobbelsteen, John J
van der Sijp, Joost RM
Horeman, Tim
author_facet Harskamp, Ralf E
van Straten, Bart
Bouman, Jonathan
van Maltha-van Santvoort, Bernadette
van den Dobbelsteen, John J
van der Sijp, Joost RM
Horeman, Tim
author_sort Harskamp, Ralf E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There are widespread shortages of personal protective equipment as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Reprocessing filtering facepiece particle (FFP)-type respirators may provide an alternative solution in keeping healthcare professionals safe. DESIGN: Prospective, bench-to-bedside. SETTING: A primary care-based study using FFP-2 respirators without exhalation valve (3M Aura 1862+ (20 samples), Maco Pharma ZZM002 (14 samples)), FFP-2 respirators with valve (3M Aura 9322+ (six samples) and San Huei 2920V (16 samples)) and valved FFP type 3 respirators (Safe Worker 1016 (10 samples)). INTERVENTIONS: All masks were reprocessed using a medical autoclave (17 min at 121°C with 34 min total cycle time) and subsequently tested up to three times whether these respirators retained their integrity (seal check and pressure drop) and ability to filter small particles (0.3–5.0 µm) in the laboratory using a particle penetration test. RESULTS: We tested 33 respirators and 66 samples for filter capacity. All FFP-2 respirators retained their shape, whereas half of the decontaminated FFP-3 respirators showed deformities and failed the seal check. The filtering capacity of the 3M Aura 1862 was best retained after one, two and three decontamination cycles (0.3 µm: 99.3%±0.3% (new) vs 97.0±1.3, 94.2±1.3% or 94.4±1.6; p<0.001). Of the other FFP-2 respirators, the San Huei 2920 V had 95.5%±0.7% at baseline vs 92.3%±1.7% vs 90.0±0.7 after one-time and two-time decontaminations, respectively (p<0.001). The tested FFP-3 respirator (Safe Worker 1016) had a filter capacity of 96.5%±0.7% at baseline and 60.3%±5.7% after one-time decontamination (p<0.001). Breathing and pressure resistance tests indicated no relevant pressure changes between respirators that were used once, twice or thrice. CONCLUSION: This small single-centre study shows that selected FFP-2 respirators may be reprocessed for use in primary care, as the tested masks retain their shape, ability to retain particles and breathing comfort after decontamination using a medical autoclave.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7406112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74061122020-08-17 Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study Harskamp, Ralf E van Straten, Bart Bouman, Jonathan van Maltha-van Santvoort, Bernadette van den Dobbelsteen, John J van der Sijp, Joost RM Horeman, Tim BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: There are widespread shortages of personal protective equipment as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Reprocessing filtering facepiece particle (FFP)-type respirators may provide an alternative solution in keeping healthcare professionals safe. DESIGN: Prospective, bench-to-bedside. SETTING: A primary care-based study using FFP-2 respirators without exhalation valve (3M Aura 1862+ (20 samples), Maco Pharma ZZM002 (14 samples)), FFP-2 respirators with valve (3M Aura 9322+ (six samples) and San Huei 2920V (16 samples)) and valved FFP type 3 respirators (Safe Worker 1016 (10 samples)). INTERVENTIONS: All masks were reprocessed using a medical autoclave (17 min at 121°C with 34 min total cycle time) and subsequently tested up to three times whether these respirators retained their integrity (seal check and pressure drop) and ability to filter small particles (0.3–5.0 µm) in the laboratory using a particle penetration test. RESULTS: We tested 33 respirators and 66 samples for filter capacity. All FFP-2 respirators retained their shape, whereas half of the decontaminated FFP-3 respirators showed deformities and failed the seal check. The filtering capacity of the 3M Aura 1862 was best retained after one, two and three decontamination cycles (0.3 µm: 99.3%±0.3% (new) vs 97.0±1.3, 94.2±1.3% or 94.4±1.6; p<0.001). Of the other FFP-2 respirators, the San Huei 2920 V had 95.5%±0.7% at baseline vs 92.3%±1.7% vs 90.0±0.7 after one-time and two-time decontaminations, respectively (p<0.001). The tested FFP-3 respirator (Safe Worker 1016) had a filter capacity of 96.5%±0.7% at baseline and 60.3%±5.7% after one-time decontamination (p<0.001). Breathing and pressure resistance tests indicated no relevant pressure changes between respirators that were used once, twice or thrice. CONCLUSION: This small single-centre study shows that selected FFP-2 respirators may be reprocessed for use in primary care, as the tested masks retain their shape, ability to retain particles and breathing comfort after decontamination using a medical autoclave. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7406112/ /pubmed/32753454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039454 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Harskamp, Ralf E
van Straten, Bart
Bouman, Jonathan
van Maltha-van Santvoort, Bernadette
van den Dobbelsteen, John J
van der Sijp, Joost RM
Horeman, Tim
Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study
title Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study
title_full Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study
title_fullStr Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study
title_full_unstemmed Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study
title_short Reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study
title_sort reprocessing filtering facepiece respirators in primary care using medical autoclave: prospective, bench-to-bedside, single-centre study
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32753454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039454
work_keys_str_mv AT harskampralfe reprocessingfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsinprimarycareusingmedicalautoclaveprospectivebenchtobedsidesinglecentrestudy
AT vanstratenbart reprocessingfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsinprimarycareusingmedicalautoclaveprospectivebenchtobedsidesinglecentrestudy
AT boumanjonathan reprocessingfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsinprimarycareusingmedicalautoclaveprospectivebenchtobedsidesinglecentrestudy
AT vanmalthavansantvoortbernadette reprocessingfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsinprimarycareusingmedicalautoclaveprospectivebenchtobedsidesinglecentrestudy
AT vandendobbelsteenjohnj reprocessingfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsinprimarycareusingmedicalautoclaveprospectivebenchtobedsidesinglecentrestudy
AT vandersijpjoostrm reprocessingfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsinprimarycareusingmedicalautoclaveprospectivebenchtobedsidesinglecentrestudy
AT horemantim reprocessingfilteringfacepiecerespiratorsinprimarycareusingmedicalautoclaveprospectivebenchtobedsidesinglecentrestudy