Cargando…

FIRST-line support for assistance in breathing in children (FIRST-ABC): a master protocol of two randomised trials to evaluate the non-inferiority of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care

INTRODUCTION: Even though respiratory support is a common intervention in paediatric critical care, there is no randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence regarding the effectiveness of two commonly used modes of non-invasive respiratory support (NRS), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richards-Belle, Alvin, Davis, Peter, Drikite, Laura, Feltbower, Richard, Grieve, Richard, Harrison, David A, Lester, Julie, Morris, Kevin P, Mouncey, Paul R, Peters, Mark J, Rowan, Kathryn M, Sadique, Zia, Tume, Lyvonne N, Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32753452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038002
_version_ 1783567380974141440
author Richards-Belle, Alvin
Davis, Peter
Drikite, Laura
Feltbower, Richard
Grieve, Richard
Harrison, David A
Lester, Julie
Morris, Kevin P
Mouncey, Paul R
Peters, Mark J
Rowan, Kathryn M
Sadique, Zia
Tume, Lyvonne N
Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan
author_facet Richards-Belle, Alvin
Davis, Peter
Drikite, Laura
Feltbower, Richard
Grieve, Richard
Harrison, David A
Lester, Julie
Morris, Kevin P
Mouncey, Paul R
Peters, Mark J
Rowan, Kathryn M
Sadique, Zia
Tume, Lyvonne N
Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan
author_sort Richards-Belle, Alvin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Even though respiratory support is a common intervention in paediatric critical care, there is no randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence regarding the effectiveness of two commonly used modes of non-invasive respiratory support (NRS), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC). FIRST-line support for assistance in breathing in children is a master protocol of two pragmatic non-inferiority RCTs to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of HFNC (compared with CPAP) as the first-line mode of support in critically ill children. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will recruit participants over a 30-month period at 25 UK paediatric critical care units (paediatric intensive care units/high-dependency units). Patients are eligible if admitted/accepted for admission, aged >36 weeks corrected gestational age and <16 years, and assessed by the treating clinician to require NRS for an acute illness (step-up RCT) or within 72 hours of extubation following a period of invasive ventilation (step-down RCT). Due to the emergency nature of the treatment, written informed consent will be deferred to after randomisation. Randomisation will occur 1:1 to CPAP or HFNC, stratified by site and age (<12 vs ≥12 months). The primary outcome is time to liberation from respiratory support for a continuous period of 48 hours. A total sample size of 600 patients in each RCT will provide 90% power with a type I error rate of 2.5% (one sided) to exclude the prespecified non-inferiority margin of HR of 0.75. Primary analyses will be undertaken separately in each RCT in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This master protocol received favourable ethical opinion from National Health Service East of England—Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee (reference: 19/EE/0185) and approval from the Health Research Authority (reference: 260536). Results will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed medical journals and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN60048867
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7406113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74061132020-08-17 FIRST-line support for assistance in breathing in children (FIRST-ABC): a master protocol of two randomised trials to evaluate the non-inferiority of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care Richards-Belle, Alvin Davis, Peter Drikite, Laura Feltbower, Richard Grieve, Richard Harrison, David A Lester, Julie Morris, Kevin P Mouncey, Paul R Peters, Mark J Rowan, Kathryn M Sadique, Zia Tume, Lyvonne N Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan BMJ Open Paediatrics INTRODUCTION: Even though respiratory support is a common intervention in paediatric critical care, there is no randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence regarding the effectiveness of two commonly used modes of non-invasive respiratory support (NRS), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC). FIRST-line support for assistance in breathing in children is a master protocol of two pragmatic non-inferiority RCTs to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of HFNC (compared with CPAP) as the first-line mode of support in critically ill children. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will recruit participants over a 30-month period at 25 UK paediatric critical care units (paediatric intensive care units/high-dependency units). Patients are eligible if admitted/accepted for admission, aged >36 weeks corrected gestational age and <16 years, and assessed by the treating clinician to require NRS for an acute illness (step-up RCT) or within 72 hours of extubation following a period of invasive ventilation (step-down RCT). Due to the emergency nature of the treatment, written informed consent will be deferred to after randomisation. Randomisation will occur 1:1 to CPAP or HFNC, stratified by site and age (<12 vs ≥12 months). The primary outcome is time to liberation from respiratory support for a continuous period of 48 hours. A total sample size of 600 patients in each RCT will provide 90% power with a type I error rate of 2.5% (one sided) to exclude the prespecified non-inferiority margin of HR of 0.75. Primary analyses will be undertaken separately in each RCT in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This master protocol received favourable ethical opinion from National Health Service East of England—Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee (reference: 19/EE/0185) and approval from the Health Research Authority (reference: 260536). Results will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed medical journals and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN60048867 BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7406113/ /pubmed/32753452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038002 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Richards-Belle, Alvin
Davis, Peter
Drikite, Laura
Feltbower, Richard
Grieve, Richard
Harrison, David A
Lester, Julie
Morris, Kevin P
Mouncey, Paul R
Peters, Mark J
Rowan, Kathryn M
Sadique, Zia
Tume, Lyvonne N
Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan
FIRST-line support for assistance in breathing in children (FIRST-ABC): a master protocol of two randomised trials to evaluate the non-inferiority of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care
title FIRST-line support for assistance in breathing in children (FIRST-ABC): a master protocol of two randomised trials to evaluate the non-inferiority of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care
title_full FIRST-line support for assistance in breathing in children (FIRST-ABC): a master protocol of two randomised trials to evaluate the non-inferiority of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care
title_fullStr FIRST-line support for assistance in breathing in children (FIRST-ABC): a master protocol of two randomised trials to evaluate the non-inferiority of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care
title_full_unstemmed FIRST-line support for assistance in breathing in children (FIRST-ABC): a master protocol of two randomised trials to evaluate the non-inferiority of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care
title_short FIRST-line support for assistance in breathing in children (FIRST-ABC): a master protocol of two randomised trials to evaluate the non-inferiority of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care
title_sort first-line support for assistance in breathing in children (first-abc): a master protocol of two randomised trials to evaluate the non-inferiority of high-flow nasal cannula (hfnc) versus continuous positive airway pressure (cpap) for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32753452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038002
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsbellealvin firstlinesupportforassistanceinbreathinginchildrenfirstabcamasterprotocoloftworandomisedtrialstoevaluatethenoninferiorityofhighflownasalcannulahfncversuscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapfornoninvasiverespiratorysupportinpaediatriccriticalcare
AT davispeter firstlinesupportforassistanceinbreathinginchildrenfirstabcamasterprotocoloftworandomisedtrialstoevaluatethenoninferiorityofhighflownasalcannulahfncversuscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapfornoninvasiverespiratorysupportinpaediatriccriticalcare
AT drikitelaura firstlinesupportforassistanceinbreathinginchildrenfirstabcamasterprotocoloftworandomisedtrialstoevaluatethenoninferiorityofhighflownasalcannulahfncversuscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapfornoninvasiverespiratorysupportinpaediatriccriticalcare
AT feltbowerrichard firstlinesupportforassistanceinbreathinginchildrenfirstabcamasterprotocoloftworandomisedtrialstoevaluatethenoninferiorityofhighflownasalcannulahfncversuscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapfornoninvasiverespiratorysupportinpaediatriccriticalcare
AT grieverichard firstlinesupportforassistanceinbreathinginchildrenfirstabcamasterprotocoloftworandomisedtrialstoevaluatethenoninferiorityofhighflownasalcannulahfncversuscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapfornoninvasiverespiratorysupportinpaediatriccriticalcare
AT harrisondavida firstlinesupportforassistanceinbreathinginchildrenfirstabcamasterprotocoloftworandomisedtrialstoevaluatethenoninferiorityofhighflownasalcannulahfncversuscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapfornoninvasiverespiratorysupportinpaediatriccriticalcare
AT lesterjulie firstlinesupportforassistanceinbreathinginchildrenfirstabcamasterprotocoloftworandomisedtrialstoevaluatethenoninferiorityofhighflownasalcannulahfncversuscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapfornoninvasiverespiratorysupportinpaediatriccriticalcare
AT morriskevinp firstlinesupportforassistanceinbreathinginchildrenfirstabcamasterprotocoloftworandomisedtrialstoevaluatethenoninferiorityofhighflownasalcannulahfncversuscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapfornoninvasiverespiratorysupportinpaediatriccriticalcare
AT mounceypaulr firstlinesupportforassistanceinbreathinginchildrenfirstabcamasterprotocoloftworandomisedtrialstoevaluatethenoninferiorityofhighflownasalcannulahfncversuscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapfornoninvasiverespiratorysupportinpaediatriccriticalcare
AT petersmarkj firstlinesupportforassistanceinbreathinginchildrenfirstabcamasterprotocoloftworandomisedtrialstoevaluatethenoninferiorityofhighflownasalcannulahfncversuscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapfornoninvasiverespiratorysupportinpaediatriccriticalcare
AT rowankathrynm firstlinesupportforassistanceinbreathinginchildrenfirstabcamasterprotocoloftworandomisedtrialstoevaluatethenoninferiorityofhighflownasalcannulahfncversuscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapfornoninvasiverespiratorysupportinpaediatriccriticalcare
AT sadiquezia firstlinesupportforassistanceinbreathinginchildrenfirstabcamasterprotocoloftworandomisedtrialstoevaluatethenoninferiorityofhighflownasalcannulahfncversuscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapfornoninvasiverespiratorysupportinpaediatriccriticalcare
AT tumelyvonnen firstlinesupportforassistanceinbreathinginchildrenfirstabcamasterprotocoloftworandomisedtrialstoevaluatethenoninferiorityofhighflownasalcannulahfncversuscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapfornoninvasiverespiratorysupportinpaediatriccriticalcare
AT ramnarayanpadmanabhan firstlinesupportforassistanceinbreathinginchildrenfirstabcamasterprotocoloftworandomisedtrialstoevaluatethenoninferiorityofhighflownasalcannulahfncversuscontinuouspositiveairwaypressurecpapfornoninvasiverespiratorysupportinpaediatriccriticalcare