Cargando…
Artificial Intelligence Distinguishes Surgical Training Levels in a Virtual Reality Spinal Task
BACKGROUND: With the emergence of competency-based training, the current evaluation scheme of surgical skills is evolving to include newer methods of assessment and training. Artificial intelligence through machine learning algorithms can utilize extensive data sets to analyze operator performance....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31800431 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.01197 |
_version_ | 1783567385013256192 |
---|---|
author | Bissonnette, Vincent Mirchi, Nykan Ledwos, Nicole Alsidieri, Ghusn Winkler-Schwartz, Alexander Del Maestro, Rolando F. |
author_facet | Bissonnette, Vincent Mirchi, Nykan Ledwos, Nicole Alsidieri, Ghusn Winkler-Schwartz, Alexander Del Maestro, Rolando F. |
author_sort | Bissonnette, Vincent |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the emergence of competency-based training, the current evaluation scheme of surgical skills is evolving to include newer methods of assessment and training. Artificial intelligence through machine learning algorithms can utilize extensive data sets to analyze operator performance. This study aimed to address 3 questions: (1) Can artificial intelligence uncover novel metrics of surgical performance? (2) Can support vector machine algorithms be trained to differentiate “senior” and “junior” participants who are executing a virtual reality hemilaminectomy? (3) Can other algorithms achieve a good classification performance? METHODS: Participants from 4 Canadian universities were divided into 2 groups according to their training level (senior and junior) and were asked to perform a virtual reality hemilaminectomy. The position, angle, and force application of the simulated burr and suction instruments, along with tissue volumes that were removed, were recorded at 20-ms intervals. Raw data were manipulated to create metrics to train machine learning algorithms. Five algorithms, including a support vector machine, were trained to predict whether the task was performed by a senior or junior participant. The accuracy of each algorithm was assessed through leave-one-out cross-validation. RESULTS: Forty-one individuals were enrolled (22 senior and 19 junior participants). Twelve metrics related to safety of the procedure, efficiency, motion of the tools, and coordination were selected. Following cross-validation, the support vector machine achieved a 97.6% accuracy. The other algorithms achieved accuracy of 92.7%, 87.8%, 70.7%, and 65.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence defined novel metrics of surgical performance and outlined training levels in a virtual reality spinal simulation procedure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The significance of these results lies in the potential of artificial intelligence to complement current educational paradigms and better prepare residents for surgical procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7406145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74061452020-08-14 Artificial Intelligence Distinguishes Surgical Training Levels in a Virtual Reality Spinal Task Bissonnette, Vincent Mirchi, Nykan Ledwos, Nicole Alsidieri, Ghusn Winkler-Schwartz, Alexander Del Maestro, Rolando F. J Bone Joint Surg Am Topics in Training BACKGROUND: With the emergence of competency-based training, the current evaluation scheme of surgical skills is evolving to include newer methods of assessment and training. Artificial intelligence through machine learning algorithms can utilize extensive data sets to analyze operator performance. This study aimed to address 3 questions: (1) Can artificial intelligence uncover novel metrics of surgical performance? (2) Can support vector machine algorithms be trained to differentiate “senior” and “junior” participants who are executing a virtual reality hemilaminectomy? (3) Can other algorithms achieve a good classification performance? METHODS: Participants from 4 Canadian universities were divided into 2 groups according to their training level (senior and junior) and were asked to perform a virtual reality hemilaminectomy. The position, angle, and force application of the simulated burr and suction instruments, along with tissue volumes that were removed, were recorded at 20-ms intervals. Raw data were manipulated to create metrics to train machine learning algorithms. Five algorithms, including a support vector machine, were trained to predict whether the task was performed by a senior or junior participant. The accuracy of each algorithm was assessed through leave-one-out cross-validation. RESULTS: Forty-one individuals were enrolled (22 senior and 19 junior participants). Twelve metrics related to safety of the procedure, efficiency, motion of the tools, and coordination were selected. Following cross-validation, the support vector machine achieved a 97.6% accuracy. The other algorithms achieved accuracy of 92.7%, 87.8%, 70.7%, and 65.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence defined novel metrics of surgical performance and outlined training levels in a virtual reality spinal simulation procedure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The significance of these results lies in the potential of artificial intelligence to complement current educational paradigms and better prepare residents for surgical procedures. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2019-12-04 2019-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7406145/ /pubmed/31800431 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.01197 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Topics in Training Bissonnette, Vincent Mirchi, Nykan Ledwos, Nicole Alsidieri, Ghusn Winkler-Schwartz, Alexander Del Maestro, Rolando F. Artificial Intelligence Distinguishes Surgical Training Levels in a Virtual Reality Spinal Task |
title | Artificial Intelligence Distinguishes Surgical Training Levels in a Virtual Reality Spinal Task |
title_full | Artificial Intelligence Distinguishes Surgical Training Levels in a Virtual Reality Spinal Task |
title_fullStr | Artificial Intelligence Distinguishes Surgical Training Levels in a Virtual Reality Spinal Task |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial Intelligence Distinguishes Surgical Training Levels in a Virtual Reality Spinal Task |
title_short | Artificial Intelligence Distinguishes Surgical Training Levels in a Virtual Reality Spinal Task |
title_sort | artificial intelligence distinguishes surgical training levels in a virtual reality spinal task |
topic | Topics in Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31800431 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.01197 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bissonnettevincent artificialintelligencedistinguishessurgicaltraininglevelsinavirtualrealityspinaltask AT mirchinykan artificialintelligencedistinguishessurgicaltraininglevelsinavirtualrealityspinaltask AT ledwosnicole artificialintelligencedistinguishessurgicaltraininglevelsinavirtualrealityspinaltask AT alsidierighusn artificialintelligencedistinguishessurgicaltraininglevelsinavirtualrealityspinaltask AT winklerschwartzalexander artificialintelligencedistinguishessurgicaltraininglevelsinavirtualrealityspinaltask AT delmaestrorolandof artificialintelligencedistinguishessurgicaltraininglevelsinavirtualrealityspinaltask |