Cargando…

Privatization of Biofilm Matrix in Structurally Heterogeneous Biofilms

The self-produced biofilm provides beneficial protection for the enclosed cells, but the costly production of matrix components makes producer cells susceptible to cheating by nonproducing individuals. Despite detrimental effects of nonproducers, biofilms can be heterogeneous, with isogenic nonprodu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Otto, Simon B., Martin, Marivic, Schäfer, Daniel, Hartmann, Raimo, Drescher, Knut, Brix, Susanne, Dragoš, Anna, Kovács, Ákos T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32753507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00425-20
_version_ 1783567392348045312
author Otto, Simon B.
Martin, Marivic
Schäfer, Daniel
Hartmann, Raimo
Drescher, Knut
Brix, Susanne
Dragoš, Anna
Kovács, Ákos T.
author_facet Otto, Simon B.
Martin, Marivic
Schäfer, Daniel
Hartmann, Raimo
Drescher, Knut
Brix, Susanne
Dragoš, Anna
Kovács, Ákos T.
author_sort Otto, Simon B.
collection PubMed
description The self-produced biofilm provides beneficial protection for the enclosed cells, but the costly production of matrix components makes producer cells susceptible to cheating by nonproducing individuals. Despite detrimental effects of nonproducers, biofilms can be heterogeneous, with isogenic nonproducers being a natural consequence of phenotypic differentiation processes. For instance, in Bacillus subtilis biofilm cells differ in production of the two major matrix components, the amyloid fiber protein TasA and exopolysaccharides (EPS), demonstrating different expression levels of corresponding matrix genes. This raises questions regarding matrix gene expression dynamics during biofilm development and the impact of phenotypic nonproducers on biofilm robustness. Here, we show that biofilms are structurally heterogeneous and can be separated into strongly and weakly associated clusters. We reveal that spatiotemporal changes in structural heterogeneity correlate with matrix gene expression, with TasA playing a key role in biofilm integrity and timing of development. We show that the matrix remains partially privatized by the producer subpopulation, where cells tightly stick together even when exposed to shear stress. Our results support previous findings on the existence of “weak points” in seemingly robust biofilms as well as on the key role of linkage proteins in biofilm formation. Furthermore, we provide a starting point for investigating the privatization of common goods within isogenic populations. IMPORTANCE Biofilms are communities of bacteria protected by a self-produced extracellular matrix. The detrimental effects of nonproducing individuals on biofilm development raise questions about the dynamics between community members, especially when isogenic nonproducers exist within wild-type populations. We asked ourselves whether phenotypic nonproducers impact biofilm robustness, and where and when this heterogeneity of matrix gene expression occurs. Based on our results, we propose that the matrix remains partly privatized by the producing subpopulation, since producing cells stick together when exposed to shear stress. The important role of linkage proteins in robustness and development of the structurally heterogeneous biofilm provides an entry into studying the privatization of common goods within isogenic populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7406226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74062262020-08-11 Privatization of Biofilm Matrix in Structurally Heterogeneous Biofilms Otto, Simon B. Martin, Marivic Schäfer, Daniel Hartmann, Raimo Drescher, Knut Brix, Susanne Dragoš, Anna Kovács, Ákos T. mSystems Research Article The self-produced biofilm provides beneficial protection for the enclosed cells, but the costly production of matrix components makes producer cells susceptible to cheating by nonproducing individuals. Despite detrimental effects of nonproducers, biofilms can be heterogeneous, with isogenic nonproducers being a natural consequence of phenotypic differentiation processes. For instance, in Bacillus subtilis biofilm cells differ in production of the two major matrix components, the amyloid fiber protein TasA and exopolysaccharides (EPS), demonstrating different expression levels of corresponding matrix genes. This raises questions regarding matrix gene expression dynamics during biofilm development and the impact of phenotypic nonproducers on biofilm robustness. Here, we show that biofilms are structurally heterogeneous and can be separated into strongly and weakly associated clusters. We reveal that spatiotemporal changes in structural heterogeneity correlate with matrix gene expression, with TasA playing a key role in biofilm integrity and timing of development. We show that the matrix remains partially privatized by the producer subpopulation, where cells tightly stick together even when exposed to shear stress. Our results support previous findings on the existence of “weak points” in seemingly robust biofilms as well as on the key role of linkage proteins in biofilm formation. Furthermore, we provide a starting point for investigating the privatization of common goods within isogenic populations. IMPORTANCE Biofilms are communities of bacteria protected by a self-produced extracellular matrix. The detrimental effects of nonproducing individuals on biofilm development raise questions about the dynamics between community members, especially when isogenic nonproducers exist within wild-type populations. We asked ourselves whether phenotypic nonproducers impact biofilm robustness, and where and when this heterogeneity of matrix gene expression occurs. Based on our results, we propose that the matrix remains partly privatized by the producing subpopulation, since producing cells stick together when exposed to shear stress. The important role of linkage proteins in robustness and development of the structurally heterogeneous biofilm provides an entry into studying the privatization of common goods within isogenic populations. American Society for Microbiology 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7406226/ /pubmed/32753507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00425-20 Text en Copyright © 2020 Otto et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Otto, Simon B.
Martin, Marivic
Schäfer, Daniel
Hartmann, Raimo
Drescher, Knut
Brix, Susanne
Dragoš, Anna
Kovács, Ákos T.
Privatization of Biofilm Matrix in Structurally Heterogeneous Biofilms
title Privatization of Biofilm Matrix in Structurally Heterogeneous Biofilms
title_full Privatization of Biofilm Matrix in Structurally Heterogeneous Biofilms
title_fullStr Privatization of Biofilm Matrix in Structurally Heterogeneous Biofilms
title_full_unstemmed Privatization of Biofilm Matrix in Structurally Heterogeneous Biofilms
title_short Privatization of Biofilm Matrix in Structurally Heterogeneous Biofilms
title_sort privatization of biofilm matrix in structurally heterogeneous biofilms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32753507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00425-20
work_keys_str_mv AT ottosimonb privatizationofbiofilmmatrixinstructurallyheterogeneousbiofilms
AT martinmarivic privatizationofbiofilmmatrixinstructurallyheterogeneousbiofilms
AT schaferdaniel privatizationofbiofilmmatrixinstructurallyheterogeneousbiofilms
AT hartmannraimo privatizationofbiofilmmatrixinstructurallyheterogeneousbiofilms
AT drescherknut privatizationofbiofilmmatrixinstructurallyheterogeneousbiofilms
AT brixsusanne privatizationofbiofilmmatrixinstructurallyheterogeneousbiofilms
AT dragosanna privatizationofbiofilmmatrixinstructurallyheterogeneousbiofilms
AT kovacsakost privatizationofbiofilmmatrixinstructurallyheterogeneousbiofilms