Cargando…

Retrorectal tumor: a single-center 10-years' experience

PURPOSE: Retrorectal tumors (RTs) are a rare incidence and recommendations on the ideal surgical approaches are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes and follow-up results of patients undergoing excision of RTs at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for undergoing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yalav, Orçun, Topal, Uğur, Eray, İsmail Cem, Deveci, Mehmet Ali, Gencel, Eyüphan, Rencuzogullari, Ahmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802816
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2020.99.2.110
_version_ 1783567411085049856
author Yalav, Orçun
Topal, Uğur
Eray, İsmail Cem
Deveci, Mehmet Ali
Gencel, Eyüphan
Rencuzogullari, Ahmet
author_facet Yalav, Orçun
Topal, Uğur
Eray, İsmail Cem
Deveci, Mehmet Ali
Gencel, Eyüphan
Rencuzogullari, Ahmet
author_sort Yalav, Orçun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Retrorectal tumors (RTs) are a rare incidence and recommendations on the ideal surgical approaches are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes and follow-up results of patients undergoing excision of RTs at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for undergoing surgery for RT between January 2009 and January 2019. Demographic characteristics, presenting symptoms, preoperative diagnostic tests, surgical procedures, histopathological results, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative 30-day mortality, 90-day unplanned readmission rate, and long-term outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty patients with a mean age of 48.3 ± 14.2 were analyzed. The most common presenting complaint was perineal pain (35.0%). Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography was preferred in 18 and 2 patients, respectively. Tumor localization was below the level of the third sacral vertebrae in 14 patients for whom the posterior surgical approach was used. No postoperative mortality was recorded at the end of follow-up of 53.8 ± 40 months. Mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 8.6 ± 9.4 days. Ten percent of the patients had unplanned hospital readmission within 90 days after discharge. Recurrence developed in 1 patient, for whom pathology were reported as chordoma. CONCLUSION: RT should be managed by a multidisciplinary team given the complexity and heterogeneity of these tumors despite the fact that the majority are benign. A good understanding of pelvic anatomy and characterization of lesions through detailed radiological imaging is crucial to optimize surgical planning. Complete surgical resection is key for prolonged disease-free and overall survival of patients diagnosed with RTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7406398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74063982020-08-13 Retrorectal tumor: a single-center 10-years' experience Yalav, Orçun Topal, Uğur Eray, İsmail Cem Deveci, Mehmet Ali Gencel, Eyüphan Rencuzogullari, Ahmet Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: Retrorectal tumors (RTs) are a rare incidence and recommendations on the ideal surgical approaches are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes and follow-up results of patients undergoing excision of RTs at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for undergoing surgery for RT between January 2009 and January 2019. Demographic characteristics, presenting symptoms, preoperative diagnostic tests, surgical procedures, histopathological results, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative 30-day mortality, 90-day unplanned readmission rate, and long-term outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty patients with a mean age of 48.3 ± 14.2 were analyzed. The most common presenting complaint was perineal pain (35.0%). Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography was preferred in 18 and 2 patients, respectively. Tumor localization was below the level of the third sacral vertebrae in 14 patients for whom the posterior surgical approach was used. No postoperative mortality was recorded at the end of follow-up of 53.8 ± 40 months. Mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 8.6 ± 9.4 days. Ten percent of the patients had unplanned hospital readmission within 90 days after discharge. Recurrence developed in 1 patient, for whom pathology were reported as chordoma. CONCLUSION: RT should be managed by a multidisciplinary team given the complexity and heterogeneity of these tumors despite the fact that the majority are benign. A good understanding of pelvic anatomy and characterization of lesions through detailed radiological imaging is crucial to optimize surgical planning. Complete surgical resection is key for prolonged disease-free and overall survival of patients diagnosed with RTs. The Korean Surgical Society 2020-08 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7406398/ /pubmed/32802816 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2020.99.2.110 Text en Copyright © 2020, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yalav, Orçun
Topal, Uğur
Eray, İsmail Cem
Deveci, Mehmet Ali
Gencel, Eyüphan
Rencuzogullari, Ahmet
Retrorectal tumor: a single-center 10-years' experience
title Retrorectal tumor: a single-center 10-years' experience
title_full Retrorectal tumor: a single-center 10-years' experience
title_fullStr Retrorectal tumor: a single-center 10-years' experience
title_full_unstemmed Retrorectal tumor: a single-center 10-years' experience
title_short Retrorectal tumor: a single-center 10-years' experience
title_sort retrorectal tumor: a single-center 10-years' experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802816
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2020.99.2.110
work_keys_str_mv AT yalavorcun retrorectaltumorasinglecenter10yearsexperience
AT topalugur retrorectaltumorasinglecenter10yearsexperience
AT erayismailcem retrorectaltumorasinglecenter10yearsexperience
AT devecimehmetali retrorectaltumorasinglecenter10yearsexperience
AT genceleyuphan retrorectaltumorasinglecenter10yearsexperience
AT rencuzogullariahmet retrorectaltumorasinglecenter10yearsexperience