Cargando…
The influence of water potential in simulation: a catabolite activator protein case study
We present a rare comparison of structures of the same protein but generated by different potentials. We used four popular water potentials (SPC, TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P) in conjunction with the equally popular ff99SB. However, the ff12SB protein potential was used with TI3P only. Simulations (60 ns) we...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31292786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00894-019-4095-3 |
_version_ | 1783567443546865664 |
---|---|
author | Liem, Steven Y. Popelier, Paul L. A. |
author_facet | Liem, Steven Y. Popelier, Paul L. A. |
author_sort | Liem, Steven Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present a rare comparison of structures of the same protein but generated by different potentials. We used four popular water potentials (SPC, TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P) in conjunction with the equally popular ff99SB. However, the ff12SB protein potential was used with TI3P only. Simulations (60 ns) were run on the catabolite activator protein (CAP), which is a textbook case of allosteric interaction. Overall, all potentials generated largely similar structures but failed to reproduce a crucial structural feature determined by NMR experiment. This example shows the need to develop next-generation potentials. [Figure: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7406532 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74065322020-08-13 The influence of water potential in simulation: a catabolite activator protein case study Liem, Steven Y. Popelier, Paul L. A. J Mol Model Original Paper We present a rare comparison of structures of the same protein but generated by different potentials. We used four popular water potentials (SPC, TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P) in conjunction with the equally popular ff99SB. However, the ff12SB protein potential was used with TI3P only. Simulations (60 ns) were run on the catabolite activator protein (CAP), which is a textbook case of allosteric interaction. Overall, all potentials generated largely similar structures but failed to reproduce a crucial structural feature determined by NMR experiment. This example shows the need to develop next-generation potentials. [Figure: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-07-10 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7406532/ /pubmed/31292786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00894-019-4095-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Liem, Steven Y. Popelier, Paul L. A. The influence of water potential in simulation: a catabolite activator protein case study |
title | The influence of water potential in simulation: a catabolite activator protein case study |
title_full | The influence of water potential in simulation: a catabolite activator protein case study |
title_fullStr | The influence of water potential in simulation: a catabolite activator protein case study |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of water potential in simulation: a catabolite activator protein case study |
title_short | The influence of water potential in simulation: a catabolite activator protein case study |
title_sort | influence of water potential in simulation: a catabolite activator protein case study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31292786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00894-019-4095-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liemsteveny theinfluenceofwaterpotentialinsimulationacataboliteactivatorproteincasestudy AT popelierpaulla theinfluenceofwaterpotentialinsimulationacataboliteactivatorproteincasestudy AT liemsteveny influenceofwaterpotentialinsimulationacataboliteactivatorproteincasestudy AT popelierpaulla influenceofwaterpotentialinsimulationacataboliteactivatorproteincasestudy |