Cargando…

The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method

OBJECTIVES: General anesthesia is preferred in most otorhinolaryngologic surgeries. The aim of the present study was to evaluate upper airway complications secondary to intubation including sore throat, cough, dysphonia, and dysphagia considering endotracheal tube (ET) cuff pressure, tube diameter,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ünsal, Özlem, Seyhun, Nurullah, Türk, Bilge, Ekici, Merve, Dobrucalı, Hale, Turgut, Suat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774093
http://dx.doi.org/10.5350/SEMB.20171214085933
_version_ 1783567450508361728
author Ünsal, Özlem
Seyhun, Nurullah
Türk, Bilge
Ekici, Merve
Dobrucalı, Hale
Turgut, Suat
author_facet Ünsal, Özlem
Seyhun, Nurullah
Türk, Bilge
Ekici, Merve
Dobrucalı, Hale
Turgut, Suat
author_sort Ünsal, Özlem
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: General anesthesia is preferred in most otorhinolaryngologic surgeries. The aim of the present study was to evaluate upper airway complications secondary to intubation including sore throat, cough, dysphonia, and dysphagia considering endotracheal tube (ET) cuff pressure, tube diameter, and duration of intubation. METHODS: After the assignment of 67 patients to the study and control groups, ET cuff pressure was adjusted to be between 20 and 30 cm H(2)O using a cuff pressure manometer in the study group. In the control group, the cuff pressure was decided by the anesthesiologist using the conventional palpation method. Sore throat, cough, dysphonia, and dysphagia were compared between the groups at 4, 8, and 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Cuff pressure was significantly higher in the control group than in the study group. In the control group, sore throat was more frequently observed at 4, 8, and 24 h, whereas in the study group, cough and dysphonia were more often observed at 4 and 8 h. At 4 and 8 h, cough was found to be related to the duration of intubation. CONCLUSION: Arrangement of cuff pressure using a cuff manometer is suggested to decrease complications of the upper airway secondary to intubation because of the higher rate of these complaints in patients whose cuff pressure is arranged by the conventional palpation method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7406561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74065612020-08-07 The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method Ünsal, Özlem Seyhun, Nurullah Türk, Bilge Ekici, Merve Dobrucalı, Hale Turgut, Suat Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul Research Article OBJECTIVES: General anesthesia is preferred in most otorhinolaryngologic surgeries. The aim of the present study was to evaluate upper airway complications secondary to intubation including sore throat, cough, dysphonia, and dysphagia considering endotracheal tube (ET) cuff pressure, tube diameter, and duration of intubation. METHODS: After the assignment of 67 patients to the study and control groups, ET cuff pressure was adjusted to be between 20 and 30 cm H(2)O using a cuff pressure manometer in the study group. In the control group, the cuff pressure was decided by the anesthesiologist using the conventional palpation method. Sore throat, cough, dysphonia, and dysphagia were compared between the groups at 4, 8, and 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Cuff pressure was significantly higher in the control group than in the study group. In the control group, sore throat was more frequently observed at 4, 8, and 24 h, whereas in the study group, cough and dysphonia were more often observed at 4 and 8 h. At 4 and 8 h, cough was found to be related to the duration of intubation. CONCLUSION: Arrangement of cuff pressure using a cuff manometer is suggested to decrease complications of the upper airway secondary to intubation because of the higher rate of these complaints in patients whose cuff pressure is arranged by the conventional palpation method. Kare Publishing 2018-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7406561/ /pubmed/32774093 http://dx.doi.org/10.5350/SEMB.20171214085933 Text en Copyright: © 2018 by The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Ünsal, Özlem
Seyhun, Nurullah
Türk, Bilge
Ekici, Merve
Dobrucalı, Hale
Turgut, Suat
The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method
title The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method
title_full The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method
title_fullStr The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method
title_full_unstemmed The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method
title_short The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method
title_sort evaluation of upper airway complications secondary to intubation: cuff pressure manometer versus conventional palpation method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774093
http://dx.doi.org/10.5350/SEMB.20171214085933
work_keys_str_mv AT unsalozlem theevaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod
AT seyhunnurullah theevaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod
AT turkbilge theevaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod
AT ekicimerve theevaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod
AT dobrucalıhale theevaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod
AT turgutsuat theevaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod
AT unsalozlem evaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod
AT seyhunnurullah evaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod
AT turkbilge evaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod
AT ekicimerve evaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod
AT dobrucalıhale evaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod
AT turgutsuat evaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod