Cargando…
The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method
OBJECTIVES: General anesthesia is preferred in most otorhinolaryngologic surgeries. The aim of the present study was to evaluate upper airway complications secondary to intubation including sore throat, cough, dysphonia, and dysphagia considering endotracheal tube (ET) cuff pressure, tube diameter,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kare Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774093 http://dx.doi.org/10.5350/SEMB.20171214085933 |
_version_ | 1783567450508361728 |
---|---|
author | Ünsal, Özlem Seyhun, Nurullah Türk, Bilge Ekici, Merve Dobrucalı, Hale Turgut, Suat |
author_facet | Ünsal, Özlem Seyhun, Nurullah Türk, Bilge Ekici, Merve Dobrucalı, Hale Turgut, Suat |
author_sort | Ünsal, Özlem |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: General anesthesia is preferred in most otorhinolaryngologic surgeries. The aim of the present study was to evaluate upper airway complications secondary to intubation including sore throat, cough, dysphonia, and dysphagia considering endotracheal tube (ET) cuff pressure, tube diameter, and duration of intubation. METHODS: After the assignment of 67 patients to the study and control groups, ET cuff pressure was adjusted to be between 20 and 30 cm H(2)O using a cuff pressure manometer in the study group. In the control group, the cuff pressure was decided by the anesthesiologist using the conventional palpation method. Sore throat, cough, dysphonia, and dysphagia were compared between the groups at 4, 8, and 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Cuff pressure was significantly higher in the control group than in the study group. In the control group, sore throat was more frequently observed at 4, 8, and 24 h, whereas in the study group, cough and dysphonia were more often observed at 4 and 8 h. At 4 and 8 h, cough was found to be related to the duration of intubation. CONCLUSION: Arrangement of cuff pressure using a cuff manometer is suggested to decrease complications of the upper airway secondary to intubation because of the higher rate of these complaints in patients whose cuff pressure is arranged by the conventional palpation method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7406561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Kare Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74065612020-08-07 The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method Ünsal, Özlem Seyhun, Nurullah Türk, Bilge Ekici, Merve Dobrucalı, Hale Turgut, Suat Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul Research Article OBJECTIVES: General anesthesia is preferred in most otorhinolaryngologic surgeries. The aim of the present study was to evaluate upper airway complications secondary to intubation including sore throat, cough, dysphonia, and dysphagia considering endotracheal tube (ET) cuff pressure, tube diameter, and duration of intubation. METHODS: After the assignment of 67 patients to the study and control groups, ET cuff pressure was adjusted to be between 20 and 30 cm H(2)O using a cuff pressure manometer in the study group. In the control group, the cuff pressure was decided by the anesthesiologist using the conventional palpation method. Sore throat, cough, dysphonia, and dysphagia were compared between the groups at 4, 8, and 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Cuff pressure was significantly higher in the control group than in the study group. In the control group, sore throat was more frequently observed at 4, 8, and 24 h, whereas in the study group, cough and dysphonia were more often observed at 4 and 8 h. At 4 and 8 h, cough was found to be related to the duration of intubation. CONCLUSION: Arrangement of cuff pressure using a cuff manometer is suggested to decrease complications of the upper airway secondary to intubation because of the higher rate of these complaints in patients whose cuff pressure is arranged by the conventional palpation method. Kare Publishing 2018-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7406561/ /pubmed/32774093 http://dx.doi.org/10.5350/SEMB.20171214085933 Text en Copyright: © 2018 by The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ünsal, Özlem Seyhun, Nurullah Türk, Bilge Ekici, Merve Dobrucalı, Hale Turgut, Suat The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method |
title | The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method |
title_full | The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method |
title_fullStr | The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method |
title_full_unstemmed | The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method |
title_short | The Evaluation of Upper Airway Complications Secondary to Intubation: Cuff Pressure Manometer Versus Conventional Palpation Method |
title_sort | evaluation of upper airway complications secondary to intubation: cuff pressure manometer versus conventional palpation method |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774093 http://dx.doi.org/10.5350/SEMB.20171214085933 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT unsalozlem theevaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod AT seyhunnurullah theevaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod AT turkbilge theevaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod AT ekicimerve theevaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod AT dobrucalıhale theevaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod AT turgutsuat theevaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod AT unsalozlem evaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod AT seyhunnurullah evaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod AT turkbilge evaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod AT ekicimerve evaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod AT dobrucalıhale evaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod AT turgutsuat evaluationofupperairwaycomplicationssecondarytointubationcuffpressuremanometerversusconventionalpalpationmethod |