Cargando…

Strategies Implemented by Public Institutions to Approach the Judicialization of Health Care in Brazil: A Systematic Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: The judicialization of health care is a social claim concerning the right to the access to health care. It usually occurs due to gaps in public policy or failures in its application. In Brazil, several public institutions have implemented strategies to approach this phenomenon. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamauti, Sueli Miyuki, Barreto, Jorge Otavio Maia, Barberato-Filho, Silvio, Lopes, Luciane Cruz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848747
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.01128
_version_ 1783567468074106880
author Yamauti, Sueli Miyuki
Barreto, Jorge Otavio Maia
Barberato-Filho, Silvio
Lopes, Luciane Cruz
author_facet Yamauti, Sueli Miyuki
Barreto, Jorge Otavio Maia
Barberato-Filho, Silvio
Lopes, Luciane Cruz
author_sort Yamauti, Sueli Miyuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The judicialization of health care is a social claim concerning the right to the access to health care. It usually occurs due to gaps in public policy or failures in its application. In Brazil, several public institutions have implemented strategies to approach this phenomenon. However, these strategies have not yet been systematized into functional categories. OBJECTIVE: To categorize and analyze the strategies implemented by public institutions in Brazil to approach the judicialization of health care. METHOD: A systematic scoping review was developed following the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The descriptor ‘judicialization of health’ was used to conduct the searches for studies in 18 electronic databases and other types of documents in the gray literature until March 2019. Documents containing the reports of strategies implemented in public institutions to approach the judicialization of health care in Brazil were included. Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility of the documents and extracted the data. The strategies identified were categorized using definitions from the World Health Organization and existing Brazilian legislation. RESULTS: Seventy eight implemented strategies were identified and organized into nine categories: i. Technical support to the judiciary; ii. State health committees; iii. Organization of assistance; iv. Compliance with court orders, v. Computerized information systems; vi. Administrative proceeding; vii. Defense of the public authority; viii. Pharmacy and therapeutics committee; ix. Alternative dispute resolution. These categories are not mutually exclusive and often act in concert or complement each other’s activities. They represent services either existing or provided for in legal provisions by the public administration to meet various types of demands. CONCLUSIONS: The categories proposed to approach the judicialization of health care represent some of the recommendations for qualifying public administration or are provided for in Brazilian legislation, or both. The existence of recommendations and legislation facilitate, but do not guarantee, the implementation of strategies by public institutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7406659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74066592020-08-25 Strategies Implemented by Public Institutions to Approach the Judicialization of Health Care in Brazil: A Systematic Scoping Review Yamauti, Sueli Miyuki Barreto, Jorge Otavio Maia Barberato-Filho, Silvio Lopes, Luciane Cruz Front Pharmacol Pharmacology BACKGROUND: The judicialization of health care is a social claim concerning the right to the access to health care. It usually occurs due to gaps in public policy or failures in its application. In Brazil, several public institutions have implemented strategies to approach this phenomenon. However, these strategies have not yet been systematized into functional categories. OBJECTIVE: To categorize and analyze the strategies implemented by public institutions in Brazil to approach the judicialization of health care. METHOD: A systematic scoping review was developed following the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The descriptor ‘judicialization of health’ was used to conduct the searches for studies in 18 electronic databases and other types of documents in the gray literature until March 2019. Documents containing the reports of strategies implemented in public institutions to approach the judicialization of health care in Brazil were included. Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility of the documents and extracted the data. The strategies identified were categorized using definitions from the World Health Organization and existing Brazilian legislation. RESULTS: Seventy eight implemented strategies were identified and organized into nine categories: i. Technical support to the judiciary; ii. State health committees; iii. Organization of assistance; iv. Compliance with court orders, v. Computerized information systems; vi. Administrative proceeding; vii. Defense of the public authority; viii. Pharmacy and therapeutics committee; ix. Alternative dispute resolution. These categories are not mutually exclusive and often act in concert or complement each other’s activities. They represent services either existing or provided for in legal provisions by the public administration to meet various types of demands. CONCLUSIONS: The categories proposed to approach the judicialization of health care represent some of the recommendations for qualifying public administration or are provided for in Brazilian legislation, or both. The existence of recommendations and legislation facilitate, but do not guarantee, the implementation of strategies by public institutions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7406659/ /pubmed/32848747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.01128 Text en Copyright © 2020 Yamauti, Barreto, Barberato-Filho and Lopes http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Yamauti, Sueli Miyuki
Barreto, Jorge Otavio Maia
Barberato-Filho, Silvio
Lopes, Luciane Cruz
Strategies Implemented by Public Institutions to Approach the Judicialization of Health Care in Brazil: A Systematic Scoping Review
title Strategies Implemented by Public Institutions to Approach the Judicialization of Health Care in Brazil: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_full Strategies Implemented by Public Institutions to Approach the Judicialization of Health Care in Brazil: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_fullStr Strategies Implemented by Public Institutions to Approach the Judicialization of Health Care in Brazil: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Strategies Implemented by Public Institutions to Approach the Judicialization of Health Care in Brazil: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_short Strategies Implemented by Public Institutions to Approach the Judicialization of Health Care in Brazil: A Systematic Scoping Review
title_sort strategies implemented by public institutions to approach the judicialization of health care in brazil: a systematic scoping review
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848747
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.01128
work_keys_str_mv AT yamautisuelimiyuki strategiesimplementedbypublicinstitutionstoapproachthejudicializationofhealthcareinbrazilasystematicscopingreview
AT barretojorgeotaviomaia strategiesimplementedbypublicinstitutionstoapproachthejudicializationofhealthcareinbrazilasystematicscopingreview
AT barberatofilhosilvio strategiesimplementedbypublicinstitutionstoapproachthejudicializationofhealthcareinbrazilasystematicscopingreview
AT lopeslucianecruz strategiesimplementedbypublicinstitutionstoapproachthejudicializationofhealthcareinbrazilasystematicscopingreview