Cargando…

Transformation of the Taiwan Biobank 3.0: vertical and horizontal integration

Researchers expect a high quality of biospecimens/data and value-added services from biobanks. Therefore, the concept of “biobank 3.0” was introduced so that biobanks could better meet the needs of stakeholders and maintain sustainable operations. Theoretically, the Taiwan Biobank (TWB) has already...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Jui-Chu, Hsiao, Wesley Wei-Wen, Fan, Chien-Te
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32762757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02451-4
_version_ 1783567521664729088
author Lin, Jui-Chu
Hsiao, Wesley Wei-Wen
Fan, Chien-Te
author_facet Lin, Jui-Chu
Hsiao, Wesley Wei-Wen
Fan, Chien-Te
author_sort Lin, Jui-Chu
collection PubMed
description Researchers expect a high quality of biospecimens/data and value-added services from biobanks. Therefore, the concept of “biobank 3.0” was introduced so that biobanks could better meet the needs of stakeholders and maintain sustainable operations. Theoretically, the Taiwan Biobank (TWB) has already gone through the concepts of biobank 1.0 and 2.0. However, three challenges still need to be addressed before it can be transformed into a new generation of the TWB (namely, the TWB 3.0): (1) the difficulty of integrating other biobanks’ resources, (2) the efficiency and effectiveness of the release and use of biospecimens/data, and (3) the development of income and revenue models of sustainability. To address these issues, this paper proposes a framework for the TWB 3.0 transformation based on a dual-pillar approach composed of a “physically” vertical integration driven by the TWB and a “virtually” horizontal network led by the National Health Research Institutes (NHRI) of Taiwan. Using prominent biobanks such as the Biobanking and BioMolecular Resources Research Infrastructure-European Research Infrastructure Consortium (BBMRI-ERIC), the UK Biobank, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH)’s All of Us Research Program as models, the TWB can strengthen its on-going TWB 2.0 operations in regional and/or international collaboration, increase the value of data collected and develop closer relationships with biobank participants and users. To these ends, the authors highlight key issues that include, but are not limited to, the harmonization of relevant ELSI standards for various biobanks’ integrations; the value-added services and the efficiency of Big Data Era related research and/or precision medicine development, and financial concerns related to biobank sustainability. This paper concludes by discussing how greater participant engagement and the uptake of Information Technology (IT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications can be used in partnership with vertical and horizontal integration as part of a four-pronged approach to promote biobank sustainability, and facilitate the TWB 3.0 transformation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7406956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74069562020-08-06 Transformation of the Taiwan Biobank 3.0: vertical and horizontal integration Lin, Jui-Chu Hsiao, Wesley Wei-Wen Fan, Chien-Te J Transl Med Commentary Researchers expect a high quality of biospecimens/data and value-added services from biobanks. Therefore, the concept of “biobank 3.0” was introduced so that biobanks could better meet the needs of stakeholders and maintain sustainable operations. Theoretically, the Taiwan Biobank (TWB) has already gone through the concepts of biobank 1.0 and 2.0. However, three challenges still need to be addressed before it can be transformed into a new generation of the TWB (namely, the TWB 3.0): (1) the difficulty of integrating other biobanks’ resources, (2) the efficiency and effectiveness of the release and use of biospecimens/data, and (3) the development of income and revenue models of sustainability. To address these issues, this paper proposes a framework for the TWB 3.0 transformation based on a dual-pillar approach composed of a “physically” vertical integration driven by the TWB and a “virtually” horizontal network led by the National Health Research Institutes (NHRI) of Taiwan. Using prominent biobanks such as the Biobanking and BioMolecular Resources Research Infrastructure-European Research Infrastructure Consortium (BBMRI-ERIC), the UK Biobank, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH)’s All of Us Research Program as models, the TWB can strengthen its on-going TWB 2.0 operations in regional and/or international collaboration, increase the value of data collected and develop closer relationships with biobank participants and users. To these ends, the authors highlight key issues that include, but are not limited to, the harmonization of relevant ELSI standards for various biobanks’ integrations; the value-added services and the efficiency of Big Data Era related research and/or precision medicine development, and financial concerns related to biobank sustainability. This paper concludes by discussing how greater participant engagement and the uptake of Information Technology (IT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications can be used in partnership with vertical and horizontal integration as part of a four-pronged approach to promote biobank sustainability, and facilitate the TWB 3.0 transformation. BioMed Central 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7406956/ /pubmed/32762757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02451-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Lin, Jui-Chu
Hsiao, Wesley Wei-Wen
Fan, Chien-Te
Transformation of the Taiwan Biobank 3.0: vertical and horizontal integration
title Transformation of the Taiwan Biobank 3.0: vertical and horizontal integration
title_full Transformation of the Taiwan Biobank 3.0: vertical and horizontal integration
title_fullStr Transformation of the Taiwan Biobank 3.0: vertical and horizontal integration
title_full_unstemmed Transformation of the Taiwan Biobank 3.0: vertical and horizontal integration
title_short Transformation of the Taiwan Biobank 3.0: vertical and horizontal integration
title_sort transformation of the taiwan biobank 3.0: vertical and horizontal integration
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32762757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02451-4
work_keys_str_mv AT linjuichu transformationofthetaiwanbiobank30verticalandhorizontalintegration
AT hsiaowesleyweiwen transformationofthetaiwanbiobank30verticalandhorizontalintegration
AT fanchiente transformationofthetaiwanbiobank30verticalandhorizontalintegration