Cargando…
What is ‘moral distress’ in nursing? A feminist empirical bioethics study
BACKGROUND: The phenomenon of ‘moral distress’ has continued to be a popular topic for nursing research. However, much of the scholarship has lacked conceptual clarity, and there is debate about what it means to experience moral distress. Moral distress remains an obscure concept to many clinical nu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31566094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733019874492 |
_version_ | 1783567528173240320 |
---|---|
author | Morley, Georgina Bradbury-Jones, Caroline Ives, Jonathan |
author_facet | Morley, Georgina Bradbury-Jones, Caroline Ives, Jonathan |
author_sort | Morley, Georgina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The phenomenon of ‘moral distress’ has continued to be a popular topic for nursing research. However, much of the scholarship has lacked conceptual clarity, and there is debate about what it means to experience moral distress. Moral distress remains an obscure concept to many clinical nurses, especially those outside of North America, and there is a lack of empirical research regarding its impact on nurses in the United Kingdom and its relevance to clinical practice. RESEARCH AIM: To explore the concept of moral distress in nursing both empirically and conceptually. METHODOLOGY: Feminist interpretive phenomenology was used to explore and analyse the experiences of critical care nurses at two acute care trauma hospitals in the United Kingdom. Empirical data were analysed using Van Manen’s six steps for data analysis. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The study was approved locally by the university ethics review committee and nationally by the Health Research Authority in the United Kingdom. FINDINGS: The empirical findings suggest that psychological distress can occur in response to a variety of moral events. The moral events identified as causing psychological distress in the participants’ narratives were moral tension, moral uncertainty, moral constraint, moral conflict and moral dilemmas. DISCUSSION: We suggest a new definition of moral distress which captures this broader range of moral events as legitimate causes of distress. We also suggest that moral distress can be sub-categroised according to the source of distress, for example, ‘moral-uncertainty distress’. We argue that this could aid in the development of interventions which attempt to address and mitigate moral distress. CONCLUSION: The empirical findings support the notion that narrow conceptions of moral distress fail to capture the real-life experiences of this group of critical care nurses. If these experiences resonate with other nurses and healthcare professionals, then it is likely that the definition needs to be broadened to recognise these experiences as ‘moral distress’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7406988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74069882020-08-19 What is ‘moral distress’ in nursing? A feminist empirical bioethics study Morley, Georgina Bradbury-Jones, Caroline Ives, Jonathan Nurs Ethics Original Manuscripts BACKGROUND: The phenomenon of ‘moral distress’ has continued to be a popular topic for nursing research. However, much of the scholarship has lacked conceptual clarity, and there is debate about what it means to experience moral distress. Moral distress remains an obscure concept to many clinical nurses, especially those outside of North America, and there is a lack of empirical research regarding its impact on nurses in the United Kingdom and its relevance to clinical practice. RESEARCH AIM: To explore the concept of moral distress in nursing both empirically and conceptually. METHODOLOGY: Feminist interpretive phenomenology was used to explore and analyse the experiences of critical care nurses at two acute care trauma hospitals in the United Kingdom. Empirical data were analysed using Van Manen’s six steps for data analysis. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The study was approved locally by the university ethics review committee and nationally by the Health Research Authority in the United Kingdom. FINDINGS: The empirical findings suggest that psychological distress can occur in response to a variety of moral events. The moral events identified as causing psychological distress in the participants’ narratives were moral tension, moral uncertainty, moral constraint, moral conflict and moral dilemmas. DISCUSSION: We suggest a new definition of moral distress which captures this broader range of moral events as legitimate causes of distress. We also suggest that moral distress can be sub-categroised according to the source of distress, for example, ‘moral-uncertainty distress’. We argue that this could aid in the development of interventions which attempt to address and mitigate moral distress. CONCLUSION: The empirical findings support the notion that narrow conceptions of moral distress fail to capture the real-life experiences of this group of critical care nurses. If these experiences resonate with other nurses and healthcare professionals, then it is likely that the definition needs to be broadened to recognise these experiences as ‘moral distress’. SAGE Publications 2019-09-29 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7406988/ /pubmed/31566094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733019874492 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Manuscripts Morley, Georgina Bradbury-Jones, Caroline Ives, Jonathan What is ‘moral distress’ in nursing? A feminist empirical bioethics study |
title | What is ‘moral distress’ in nursing? A feminist empirical bioethics study |
title_full | What is ‘moral distress’ in nursing? A feminist empirical bioethics study |
title_fullStr | What is ‘moral distress’ in nursing? A feminist empirical bioethics study |
title_full_unstemmed | What is ‘moral distress’ in nursing? A feminist empirical bioethics study |
title_short | What is ‘moral distress’ in nursing? A feminist empirical bioethics study |
title_sort | what is ‘moral distress’ in nursing? a feminist empirical bioethics study |
topic | Original Manuscripts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31566094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733019874492 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morleygeorgina whatismoraldistressinnursingafeministempiricalbioethicsstudy AT bradburyjonescaroline whatismoraldistressinnursingafeministempiricalbioethicsstudy AT ivesjonathan whatismoraldistressinnursingafeministempiricalbioethicsstudy |