Cargando…

Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review

Ureteroplasty using onlay grafts or flaps emerged as an innovative procedure for the management of proximal and midureteral strictures. Autologous grafts or flaps used commonly in ureteroplasty include the oral mucosae, bladder mucosae, ileal mucosae, and appendiceal mucosae. Oral mucosa grafts, esp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Shengwei, Wang, Jie, Zhu, Weijie, Yang, Kunlin, Ding, Guangpu, Li, Xuesong, Eun, Daniel D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32775430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6178286
_version_ 1783567536452796416
author Xiong, Shengwei
Wang, Jie
Zhu, Weijie
Yang, Kunlin
Ding, Guangpu
Li, Xuesong
Eun, Daniel D.
author_facet Xiong, Shengwei
Wang, Jie
Zhu, Weijie
Yang, Kunlin
Ding, Guangpu
Li, Xuesong
Eun, Daniel D.
author_sort Xiong, Shengwei
collection PubMed
description Ureteroplasty using onlay grafts or flaps emerged as an innovative procedure for the management of proximal and midureteral strictures. Autologous grafts or flaps used commonly in ureteroplasty include the oral mucosae, bladder mucosae, ileal mucosae, and appendiceal mucosae. Oral mucosa grafts, especially buccal mucosa grafts (BMGs), have gained wide acceptance as a graft choice for ureteroplasty. The reported length of BMG ureteroplasty ranged from 1.5 to 11 cm with success rates of 71.4%-100%. However, several studies have demonstrated that ureteroplasty using lingual mucosa grafts yields better recipient site outcomes and fewer donor site complications than that using BMGs. In addition, there is no essential difference in the efficacy and complication rates of BMG ureteroplasty using an anterior approach or a posterior approach. Intestinal graft or flap ureteroplasty was also reported. And the reported length of ileal or appendiceal flap ureteroplasty ranged from 1 to 8 cm with success rates of 75%-100%. Moreover, the bladder mucosa, renal pelvis wall, and penile/preputial skin have also been reported to be used for ureteroplasty and have achieved satisfactory outcomes, but each graft or flap has unique advantages and potential problems. Tissue engineering-based ureteroplasty through the implantation of patched scaffolds, such as the small intestine submucosa, with or without cell seeding, has induced successful ureteral regeneration structurally close to that of the native ureter and has resulted in good functional outcomes in animal models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7407031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74070312020-08-07 Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review Xiong, Shengwei Wang, Jie Zhu, Weijie Yang, Kunlin Ding, Guangpu Li, Xuesong Eun, Daniel D. Biomed Res Int Review Article Ureteroplasty using onlay grafts or flaps emerged as an innovative procedure for the management of proximal and midureteral strictures. Autologous grafts or flaps used commonly in ureteroplasty include the oral mucosae, bladder mucosae, ileal mucosae, and appendiceal mucosae. Oral mucosa grafts, especially buccal mucosa grafts (BMGs), have gained wide acceptance as a graft choice for ureteroplasty. The reported length of BMG ureteroplasty ranged from 1.5 to 11 cm with success rates of 71.4%-100%. However, several studies have demonstrated that ureteroplasty using lingual mucosa grafts yields better recipient site outcomes and fewer donor site complications than that using BMGs. In addition, there is no essential difference in the efficacy and complication rates of BMG ureteroplasty using an anterior approach or a posterior approach. Intestinal graft or flap ureteroplasty was also reported. And the reported length of ileal or appendiceal flap ureteroplasty ranged from 1 to 8 cm with success rates of 75%-100%. Moreover, the bladder mucosa, renal pelvis wall, and penile/preputial skin have also been reported to be used for ureteroplasty and have achieved satisfactory outcomes, but each graft or flap has unique advantages and potential problems. Tissue engineering-based ureteroplasty through the implantation of patched scaffolds, such as the small intestine submucosa, with or without cell seeding, has induced successful ureteral regeneration structurally close to that of the native ureter and has resulted in good functional outcomes in animal models. Hindawi 2020-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7407031/ /pubmed/32775430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6178286 Text en Copyright © 2020 Shengwei Xiong et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Xiong, Shengwei
Wang, Jie
Zhu, Weijie
Yang, Kunlin
Ding, Guangpu
Li, Xuesong
Eun, Daniel D.
Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review
title Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review
title_full Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review
title_fullStr Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review
title_full_unstemmed Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review
title_short Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review
title_sort onlay repair technique for the management of ureteral strictures: a comprehensive review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32775430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6178286
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongshengwei onlayrepairtechniqueforthemanagementofureteralstricturesacomprehensivereview
AT wangjie onlayrepairtechniqueforthemanagementofureteralstricturesacomprehensivereview
AT zhuweijie onlayrepairtechniqueforthemanagementofureteralstricturesacomprehensivereview
AT yangkunlin onlayrepairtechniqueforthemanagementofureteralstricturesacomprehensivereview
AT dingguangpu onlayrepairtechniqueforthemanagementofureteralstricturesacomprehensivereview
AT lixuesong onlayrepairtechniqueforthemanagementofureteralstricturesacomprehensivereview
AT eundanield onlayrepairtechniqueforthemanagementofureteralstricturesacomprehensivereview