Cargando…
Oil Conductivity, Electric-Field-Induced Interfacial Charge Effects, and Their Influence on the Electro-Optical Response of Electrowetting Display Devices
A pixel in an electrowetting display (EWD) can be viewed as a confined water/oil two-phase microfluidic system that can be manipulated by applying an electric field. The phenomenon of charge trapping in the protective dielectric and conductivity of the oil phase reduce the effective electric field t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698463 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi11070702 |
_version_ | 1783567560052047872 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Chengdian Tang, Biao Xu, Bojian Groenewold, Jan Zhou, Guofu |
author_facet | Jiang, Chengdian Tang, Biao Xu, Bojian Groenewold, Jan Zhou, Guofu |
author_sort | Jiang, Chengdian |
collection | PubMed |
description | A pixel in an electrowetting display (EWD) can be viewed as a confined water/oil two-phase microfluidic system that can be manipulated by applying an electric field. The phenomenon of charge trapping in the protective dielectric and conductivity of the oil phase reduce the effective electric field that is required to keep the three-phase contact line (TCL) in place. This probably leads to an oil-backflow effect which deteriorates the electro-optical performance of EWD devices. In order to investigate charge trapping and conduction effects on the device electro-optical response, an EWD device was studied, which was fabricated with a black oil, aiming for a high-contrast ratio and color-filter display. For comparison, we also prepared a device containing a purple oil, which had a lower electrical conductivity. As anticipated, the black-oil device showed faster backflow than the purple-oil device. A simple model was proposed to explain the role of oil conductivity in the backflow effect. In addition, the rebound and reopening effects were also observed after the voltage was switched to zero. The above observations were strongly dependent on polarity. By combining observations of the polarity dependence of the oil conductivity and assuming that negative charges trap more strongly in the dielectric than positive charges, our experimental results on rebound and reopening can be explained. In the AC optical response, the pixel closing speed decreased in time for intermediate frequencies. This is likely related to the phenomenon of charge trapping. It was also found that the periodic driving method could not suppress the backflow effect when the driving frequency was above ~10 kHz. Our findings confirm the significance of the above charge-related effects of EWD devices, which need to be investigated further for better understanding in order to properly design/use materials and driving schemes to suppress them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7407153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74071532020-08-11 Oil Conductivity, Electric-Field-Induced Interfacial Charge Effects, and Their Influence on the Electro-Optical Response of Electrowetting Display Devices Jiang, Chengdian Tang, Biao Xu, Bojian Groenewold, Jan Zhou, Guofu Micromachines (Basel) Article A pixel in an electrowetting display (EWD) can be viewed as a confined water/oil two-phase microfluidic system that can be manipulated by applying an electric field. The phenomenon of charge trapping in the protective dielectric and conductivity of the oil phase reduce the effective electric field that is required to keep the three-phase contact line (TCL) in place. This probably leads to an oil-backflow effect which deteriorates the electro-optical performance of EWD devices. In order to investigate charge trapping and conduction effects on the device electro-optical response, an EWD device was studied, which was fabricated with a black oil, aiming for a high-contrast ratio and color-filter display. For comparison, we also prepared a device containing a purple oil, which had a lower electrical conductivity. As anticipated, the black-oil device showed faster backflow than the purple-oil device. A simple model was proposed to explain the role of oil conductivity in the backflow effect. In addition, the rebound and reopening effects were also observed after the voltage was switched to zero. The above observations were strongly dependent on polarity. By combining observations of the polarity dependence of the oil conductivity and assuming that negative charges trap more strongly in the dielectric than positive charges, our experimental results on rebound and reopening can be explained. In the AC optical response, the pixel closing speed decreased in time for intermediate frequencies. This is likely related to the phenomenon of charge trapping. It was also found that the periodic driving method could not suppress the backflow effect when the driving frequency was above ~10 kHz. Our findings confirm the significance of the above charge-related effects of EWD devices, which need to be investigated further for better understanding in order to properly design/use materials and driving schemes to suppress them. MDPI 2020-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7407153/ /pubmed/32698463 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi11070702 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jiang, Chengdian Tang, Biao Xu, Bojian Groenewold, Jan Zhou, Guofu Oil Conductivity, Electric-Field-Induced Interfacial Charge Effects, and Their Influence on the Electro-Optical Response of Electrowetting Display Devices |
title | Oil Conductivity, Electric-Field-Induced Interfacial Charge Effects, and Their Influence on the Electro-Optical Response of Electrowetting Display Devices |
title_full | Oil Conductivity, Electric-Field-Induced Interfacial Charge Effects, and Their Influence on the Electro-Optical Response of Electrowetting Display Devices |
title_fullStr | Oil Conductivity, Electric-Field-Induced Interfacial Charge Effects, and Their Influence on the Electro-Optical Response of Electrowetting Display Devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Oil Conductivity, Electric-Field-Induced Interfacial Charge Effects, and Their Influence on the Electro-Optical Response of Electrowetting Display Devices |
title_short | Oil Conductivity, Electric-Field-Induced Interfacial Charge Effects, and Their Influence on the Electro-Optical Response of Electrowetting Display Devices |
title_sort | oil conductivity, electric-field-induced interfacial charge effects, and their influence on the electro-optical response of electrowetting display devices |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698463 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi11070702 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangchengdian oilconductivityelectricfieldinducedinterfacialchargeeffectsandtheirinfluenceontheelectroopticalresponseofelectrowettingdisplaydevices AT tangbiao oilconductivityelectricfieldinducedinterfacialchargeeffectsandtheirinfluenceontheelectroopticalresponseofelectrowettingdisplaydevices AT xubojian oilconductivityelectricfieldinducedinterfacialchargeeffectsandtheirinfluenceontheelectroopticalresponseofelectrowettingdisplaydevices AT groenewoldjan oilconductivityelectricfieldinducedinterfacialchargeeffectsandtheirinfluenceontheelectroopticalresponseofelectrowettingdisplaydevices AT zhouguofu oilconductivityelectricfieldinducedinterfacialchargeeffectsandtheirinfluenceontheelectroopticalresponseofelectrowettingdisplaydevices |