Cargando…
Influence of Voluntary Contraction Level, Test Stimulus Intensity and Normalization Procedures on the Evaluation of Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition
Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) represents an inhibitory phenomenon acting at the cortical level. However, SICI estimation is based on the amplitude of a motor-evoked potential (MEP), which depends on the discharge of spinal motoneurones and the generation of compound muscle action po...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32650395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10070433 |
_version_ | 1783567565903101952 |
---|---|
author | Neige, Cécilia Grosprêtre, Sidney Martin, Alain Lebon, Florent |
author_facet | Neige, Cécilia Grosprêtre, Sidney Martin, Alain Lebon, Florent |
author_sort | Neige, Cécilia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) represents an inhibitory phenomenon acting at the cortical level. However, SICI estimation is based on the amplitude of a motor-evoked potential (MEP), which depends on the discharge of spinal motoneurones and the generation of compound muscle action potential (M-wave). In this study, we underpin the importance of taking into account the proportion of spinal motoneurones that are activated or not when investigating the SICI of the right flexor carpi radialis (normalization with maximal M-wave (Mmax) and MEP(test), respectively), in 15 healthy subjects. We probed SICI changes according to various MEP(test) amplitudes that were modulated actively (four levels of muscle contraction: rest, 10%, 20% and 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)) and passively (two intensities of test transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): 120 and 130% of motor thresholds). When normalized to MEP(test), SICI remained unchanged by stimulation intensity and only decreased at 30% of MVC when compared with rest. However, when normalized to Mmax, we provided the first evidence of a strong individual relationship between SICI and MEP(test), which was ultimately independent from experimental conditions (muscle states and TMS intensities). Under similar experimental conditions, it is thus possible to predict SICI individually from a specific level of corticospinal excitability in healthy subjects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7407177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74071772020-08-11 Influence of Voluntary Contraction Level, Test Stimulus Intensity and Normalization Procedures on the Evaluation of Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition Neige, Cécilia Grosprêtre, Sidney Martin, Alain Lebon, Florent Brain Sci Article Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) represents an inhibitory phenomenon acting at the cortical level. However, SICI estimation is based on the amplitude of a motor-evoked potential (MEP), which depends on the discharge of spinal motoneurones and the generation of compound muscle action potential (M-wave). In this study, we underpin the importance of taking into account the proportion of spinal motoneurones that are activated or not when investigating the SICI of the right flexor carpi radialis (normalization with maximal M-wave (Mmax) and MEP(test), respectively), in 15 healthy subjects. We probed SICI changes according to various MEP(test) amplitudes that were modulated actively (four levels of muscle contraction: rest, 10%, 20% and 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)) and passively (two intensities of test transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): 120 and 130% of motor thresholds). When normalized to MEP(test), SICI remained unchanged by stimulation intensity and only decreased at 30% of MVC when compared with rest. However, when normalized to Mmax, we provided the first evidence of a strong individual relationship between SICI and MEP(test), which was ultimately independent from experimental conditions (muscle states and TMS intensities). Under similar experimental conditions, it is thus possible to predict SICI individually from a specific level of corticospinal excitability in healthy subjects. MDPI 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7407177/ /pubmed/32650395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10070433 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Neige, Cécilia Grosprêtre, Sidney Martin, Alain Lebon, Florent Influence of Voluntary Contraction Level, Test Stimulus Intensity and Normalization Procedures on the Evaluation of Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition |
title | Influence of Voluntary Contraction Level, Test Stimulus Intensity and Normalization Procedures on the Evaluation of Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition |
title_full | Influence of Voluntary Contraction Level, Test Stimulus Intensity and Normalization Procedures on the Evaluation of Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition |
title_fullStr | Influence of Voluntary Contraction Level, Test Stimulus Intensity and Normalization Procedures on the Evaluation of Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Voluntary Contraction Level, Test Stimulus Intensity and Normalization Procedures on the Evaluation of Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition |
title_short | Influence of Voluntary Contraction Level, Test Stimulus Intensity and Normalization Procedures on the Evaluation of Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition |
title_sort | influence of voluntary contraction level, test stimulus intensity and normalization procedures on the evaluation of short-interval intracortical inhibition |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32650395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10070433 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neigececilia influenceofvoluntarycontractionlevelteststimulusintensityandnormalizationproceduresontheevaluationofshortintervalintracorticalinhibition AT grospretresidney influenceofvoluntarycontractionlevelteststimulusintensityandnormalizationproceduresontheevaluationofshortintervalintracorticalinhibition AT martinalain influenceofvoluntarycontractionlevelteststimulusintensityandnormalizationproceduresontheevaluationofshortintervalintracorticalinhibition AT lebonflorent influenceofvoluntarycontractionlevelteststimulusintensityandnormalizationproceduresontheevaluationofshortintervalintracorticalinhibition |