Cargando…
The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of final surface treatment and dental composite type on the roughness of the composite surface, composite/enamel interface, and composite/cementum interface, as well as on the polishing time. Class V cavities prepared in extracted teeth (n = 12...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32659992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10071339 |
_version_ | 1783567573551415296 |
---|---|
author | Babina, Ksenia Polyakova, Maria Sokhova, Inna Doroshina, Vladlena Arakelyan, Marianna Novozhilova, Nina |
author_facet | Babina, Ksenia Polyakova, Maria Sokhova, Inna Doroshina, Vladlena Arakelyan, Marianna Novozhilova, Nina |
author_sort | Babina, Ksenia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of final surface treatment and dental composite type on the roughness of the composite surface, composite/enamel interface, and composite/cementum interface, as well as on the polishing time. Class V cavities prepared in extracted teeth (n = 126) were restored using one of the three nanohybrid composites with different filler sizes. The specimens were randomly assigned to three different finishing and polishing sequences. The roughness (Ra) of the investigated surfaces was measured using the contact profilometer. The time required to achieve visible gloss was documented. The data were analyzed using ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (p < 0.05). There was no significant influence of the composite type on the restoration surface roughness (p = 0.088), while the polishing method had a significant impact (p < 0.001). The Ra of the composites ranged between 0.08 µm and 0.29 µm, with the lowest values (0.09 µm ± 0.05 µm) found in the aluminum oxide disc group (p < 0.001). The time to achieve a visible composite gloss was influenced by the polishing method, composite type, and interactions between these factors (p < 0.001). The interface roughness was significantly greater than that of the composite surface (p < 0.001), and depended on the composite type and polishing system employed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7407209 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74072092020-08-11 The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces Babina, Ksenia Polyakova, Maria Sokhova, Inna Doroshina, Vladlena Arakelyan, Marianna Novozhilova, Nina Nanomaterials (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of final surface treatment and dental composite type on the roughness of the composite surface, composite/enamel interface, and composite/cementum interface, as well as on the polishing time. Class V cavities prepared in extracted teeth (n = 126) were restored using one of the three nanohybrid composites with different filler sizes. The specimens were randomly assigned to three different finishing and polishing sequences. The roughness (Ra) of the investigated surfaces was measured using the contact profilometer. The time required to achieve visible gloss was documented. The data were analyzed using ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (p < 0.05). There was no significant influence of the composite type on the restoration surface roughness (p = 0.088), while the polishing method had a significant impact (p < 0.001). The Ra of the composites ranged between 0.08 µm and 0.29 µm, with the lowest values (0.09 µm ± 0.05 µm) found in the aluminum oxide disc group (p < 0.001). The time to achieve a visible composite gloss was influenced by the polishing method, composite type, and interactions between these factors (p < 0.001). The interface roughness was significantly greater than that of the composite surface (p < 0.001), and depended on the composite type and polishing system employed. MDPI 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7407209/ /pubmed/32659992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10071339 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Babina, Ksenia Polyakova, Maria Sokhova, Inna Doroshina, Vladlena Arakelyan, Marianna Novozhilova, Nina The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces |
title | The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces |
title_full | The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces |
title_short | The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces |
title_sort | effect of finishing and polishing sequences on the surface roughness of three different nanocomposites and composite/enamel and composite/cementum interfaces |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32659992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10071339 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT babinaksenia theeffectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces AT polyakovamaria theeffectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces AT sokhovainna theeffectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces AT doroshinavladlena theeffectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces AT arakelyanmarianna theeffectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces AT novozhilovanina theeffectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces AT babinaksenia effectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces AT polyakovamaria effectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces AT sokhovainna effectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces AT doroshinavladlena effectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces AT arakelyanmarianna effectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces AT novozhilovanina effectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces |