Cargando…

The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of final surface treatment and dental composite type on the roughness of the composite surface, composite/enamel interface, and composite/cementum interface, as well as on the polishing time. Class V cavities prepared in extracted teeth (n = 12...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babina, Ksenia, Polyakova, Maria, Sokhova, Inna, Doroshina, Vladlena, Arakelyan, Marianna, Novozhilova, Nina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32659992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10071339
_version_ 1783567573551415296
author Babina, Ksenia
Polyakova, Maria
Sokhova, Inna
Doroshina, Vladlena
Arakelyan, Marianna
Novozhilova, Nina
author_facet Babina, Ksenia
Polyakova, Maria
Sokhova, Inna
Doroshina, Vladlena
Arakelyan, Marianna
Novozhilova, Nina
author_sort Babina, Ksenia
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of final surface treatment and dental composite type on the roughness of the composite surface, composite/enamel interface, and composite/cementum interface, as well as on the polishing time. Class V cavities prepared in extracted teeth (n = 126) were restored using one of the three nanohybrid composites with different filler sizes. The specimens were randomly assigned to three different finishing and polishing sequences. The roughness (Ra) of the investigated surfaces was measured using the contact profilometer. The time required to achieve visible gloss was documented. The data were analyzed using ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (p < 0.05). There was no significant influence of the composite type on the restoration surface roughness (p = 0.088), while the polishing method had a significant impact (p < 0.001). The Ra of the composites ranged between 0.08 µm and 0.29 µm, with the lowest values (0.09 µm ± 0.05 µm) found in the aluminum oxide disc group (p < 0.001). The time to achieve a visible composite gloss was influenced by the polishing method, composite type, and interactions between these factors (p < 0.001). The interface roughness was significantly greater than that of the composite surface (p < 0.001), and depended on the composite type and polishing system employed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7407209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74072092020-08-11 The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces Babina, Ksenia Polyakova, Maria Sokhova, Inna Doroshina, Vladlena Arakelyan, Marianna Novozhilova, Nina Nanomaterials (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of final surface treatment and dental composite type on the roughness of the composite surface, composite/enamel interface, and composite/cementum interface, as well as on the polishing time. Class V cavities prepared in extracted teeth (n = 126) were restored using one of the three nanohybrid composites with different filler sizes. The specimens were randomly assigned to three different finishing and polishing sequences. The roughness (Ra) of the investigated surfaces was measured using the contact profilometer. The time required to achieve visible gloss was documented. The data were analyzed using ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (p < 0.05). There was no significant influence of the composite type on the restoration surface roughness (p = 0.088), while the polishing method had a significant impact (p < 0.001). The Ra of the composites ranged between 0.08 µm and 0.29 µm, with the lowest values (0.09 µm ± 0.05 µm) found in the aluminum oxide disc group (p < 0.001). The time to achieve a visible composite gloss was influenced by the polishing method, composite type, and interactions between these factors (p < 0.001). The interface roughness was significantly greater than that of the composite surface (p < 0.001), and depended on the composite type and polishing system employed. MDPI 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7407209/ /pubmed/32659992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10071339 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Babina, Ksenia
Polyakova, Maria
Sokhova, Inna
Doroshina, Vladlena
Arakelyan, Marianna
Novozhilova, Nina
The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces
title The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces
title_full The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces
title_fullStr The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces
title_short The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces
title_sort effect of finishing and polishing sequences on the surface roughness of three different nanocomposites and composite/enamel and composite/cementum interfaces
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32659992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10071339
work_keys_str_mv AT babinaksenia theeffectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces
AT polyakovamaria theeffectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces
AT sokhovainna theeffectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces
AT doroshinavladlena theeffectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces
AT arakelyanmarianna theeffectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces
AT novozhilovanina theeffectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces
AT babinaksenia effectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces
AT polyakovamaria effectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces
AT sokhovainna effectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces
AT doroshinavladlena effectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces
AT arakelyanmarianna effectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces
AT novozhilovanina effectoffinishingandpolishingsequencesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentnanocompositesandcompositeenamelandcompositecementuminterfaces