Cargando…

The intersectional genetics landscape for humans

BACKGROUND: The human body is made up of hundreds—perhaps thousands—of cell types and states, most of which are currently inaccessible genetically. Intersectional genetic approaches can increase the number of genetically accessible cells, but the scope and safety of these approaches have not been sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macedo, Andre, Gontijo, Alisson M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32761099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaa083
_version_ 1783567583379718144
author Macedo, Andre
Gontijo, Alisson M
author_facet Macedo, Andre
Gontijo, Alisson M
author_sort Macedo, Andre
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The human body is made up of hundreds—perhaps thousands—of cell types and states, most of which are currently inaccessible genetically. Intersectional genetic approaches can increase the number of genetically accessible cells, but the scope and safety of these approaches have not been systematically assessed. A typical intersectional method acts like an “AND" logic gate by converting the input of 2 or more active, yet unspecific, regulatory elements (REs) into a single cell type specific synthetic output. RESULTS: Here, we systematically assessed the intersectional genetics landscape of the human genome using a subset of cells from a large RE usage atlas (Functional ANnoTation Of the Mammalian genome 5 consortium, FANTOM5) obtained by cap analysis of gene expression sequencing (CAGE-seq). We developed the heuristics and algorithms to retrieve and quality-rank “AND" gate intersections. Of the 154 primary cell types surveyed, >90% can be distinguished from each other with as few as 3 to 4 active REs, with quantifiable safety and robustness. We call these minimal intersections of active REs with cell-type diagnostic potential “versatile entry codes" (VEnCodes). Each of the 158 cancer cell types surveyed could also be distinguished from the healthy primary cell types with small VEnCodes, most of which were robust to intra- and interindividual variation. Methods for the cross-validation of CAGE-seq–derived VEnCodes and for the extraction of VEnCodes from pooled single-cell sequencing data are also presented. CONCLUSIONS: Our work provides a systematic view of the intersectional genetics landscape in humans and demonstrates the potential of these approaches for future gene delivery technologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7407247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74072472020-08-10 The intersectional genetics landscape for humans Macedo, Andre Gontijo, Alisson M Gigascience Research BACKGROUND: The human body is made up of hundreds—perhaps thousands—of cell types and states, most of which are currently inaccessible genetically. Intersectional genetic approaches can increase the number of genetically accessible cells, but the scope and safety of these approaches have not been systematically assessed. A typical intersectional method acts like an “AND" logic gate by converting the input of 2 or more active, yet unspecific, regulatory elements (REs) into a single cell type specific synthetic output. RESULTS: Here, we systematically assessed the intersectional genetics landscape of the human genome using a subset of cells from a large RE usage atlas (Functional ANnoTation Of the Mammalian genome 5 consortium, FANTOM5) obtained by cap analysis of gene expression sequencing (CAGE-seq). We developed the heuristics and algorithms to retrieve and quality-rank “AND" gate intersections. Of the 154 primary cell types surveyed, >90% can be distinguished from each other with as few as 3 to 4 active REs, with quantifiable safety and robustness. We call these minimal intersections of active REs with cell-type diagnostic potential “versatile entry codes" (VEnCodes). Each of the 158 cancer cell types surveyed could also be distinguished from the healthy primary cell types with small VEnCodes, most of which were robust to intra- and interindividual variation. Methods for the cross-validation of CAGE-seq–derived VEnCodes and for the extraction of VEnCodes from pooled single-cell sequencing data are also presented. CONCLUSIONS: Our work provides a systematic view of the intersectional genetics landscape in humans and demonstrates the potential of these approaches for future gene delivery technologies. Oxford University Press 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7407247/ /pubmed/32761099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaa083 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Macedo, Andre
Gontijo, Alisson M
The intersectional genetics landscape for humans
title The intersectional genetics landscape for humans
title_full The intersectional genetics landscape for humans
title_fullStr The intersectional genetics landscape for humans
title_full_unstemmed The intersectional genetics landscape for humans
title_short The intersectional genetics landscape for humans
title_sort intersectional genetics landscape for humans
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32761099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaa083
work_keys_str_mv AT macedoandre theintersectionalgeneticslandscapeforhumans
AT gontijoalissonm theintersectionalgeneticslandscapeforhumans
AT macedoandre intersectionalgeneticslandscapeforhumans
AT gontijoalissonm intersectionalgeneticslandscapeforhumans