Cargando…
State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images
Brain tumors have become a leading cause of death around the globe. The main reason for this epidemic is the difficulty conducting a timely diagnosis of the tumor. Fortunately, magnetic resonance images (MRI) are utilized to diagnose tumors in most cases. The performance of a Convolutional Neural Ne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32635409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10070427 |
_version_ | 1783567681081835520 |
---|---|
author | Yaqub, Muhammad Feng, Jinchao Zia, M. Sultan Arshid, Kaleem Jia, Kebin Rehman, Zaka Ur Mehmood, Atif |
author_facet | Yaqub, Muhammad Feng, Jinchao Zia, M. Sultan Arshid, Kaleem Jia, Kebin Rehman, Zaka Ur Mehmood, Atif |
author_sort | Yaqub, Muhammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Brain tumors have become a leading cause of death around the globe. The main reason for this epidemic is the difficulty conducting a timely diagnosis of the tumor. Fortunately, magnetic resonance images (MRI) are utilized to diagnose tumors in most cases. The performance of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) depends on many factors (i.e., weight initialization, optimization, batches and epochs, learning rate, activation function, loss function, and network topology), data quality, and specific combinations of these model attributes. When we deal with a segmentation or classification problem, utilizing a single optimizer is considered weak testing or validity unless the decision of the selection of an optimizer is backed up by a strong argument. Therefore, optimizer selection processes are considered important to validate the usage of a single optimizer in order to attain these decision problems. In this paper, we provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of popular optimizers of CNN to benchmark the segmentation for improvement. In detail, we perform a comparative analysis of 10 different state-of-the-art gradient descent-based optimizers, namely Adaptive Gradient (Adagrad), Adaptive Delta (AdaDelta), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Adaptive Momentum (Adam), Cyclic Learning Rate (CLR), Adaptive Max Pooling (Adamax), Root Mean Square Propagation (RMS Prop), Nesterov Adaptive Momentum (Nadam), and Nesterov accelerated gradient (NAG) for CNN. The experiments were performed on the BraTS2015 data set. The Adam optimizer had the best accuracy of 99.2% in enhancing the CNN ability in classification and segmentation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7407771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74077712020-08-12 State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images Yaqub, Muhammad Feng, Jinchao Zia, M. Sultan Arshid, Kaleem Jia, Kebin Rehman, Zaka Ur Mehmood, Atif Brain Sci Article Brain tumors have become a leading cause of death around the globe. The main reason for this epidemic is the difficulty conducting a timely diagnosis of the tumor. Fortunately, magnetic resonance images (MRI) are utilized to diagnose tumors in most cases. The performance of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) depends on many factors (i.e., weight initialization, optimization, batches and epochs, learning rate, activation function, loss function, and network topology), data quality, and specific combinations of these model attributes. When we deal with a segmentation or classification problem, utilizing a single optimizer is considered weak testing or validity unless the decision of the selection of an optimizer is backed up by a strong argument. Therefore, optimizer selection processes are considered important to validate the usage of a single optimizer in order to attain these decision problems. In this paper, we provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of popular optimizers of CNN to benchmark the segmentation for improvement. In detail, we perform a comparative analysis of 10 different state-of-the-art gradient descent-based optimizers, namely Adaptive Gradient (Adagrad), Adaptive Delta (AdaDelta), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Adaptive Momentum (Adam), Cyclic Learning Rate (CLR), Adaptive Max Pooling (Adamax), Root Mean Square Propagation (RMS Prop), Nesterov Adaptive Momentum (Nadam), and Nesterov accelerated gradient (NAG) for CNN. The experiments were performed on the BraTS2015 data set. The Adam optimizer had the best accuracy of 99.2% in enhancing the CNN ability in classification and segmentation. MDPI 2020-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7407771/ /pubmed/32635409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10070427 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yaqub, Muhammad Feng, Jinchao Zia, M. Sultan Arshid, Kaleem Jia, Kebin Rehman, Zaka Ur Mehmood, Atif State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images |
title | State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images |
title_full | State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images |
title_fullStr | State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images |
title_full_unstemmed | State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images |
title_short | State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images |
title_sort | state-of-the-art cnn optimizer for brain tumor segmentation in magnetic resonance images |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32635409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10070427 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yaqubmuhammad stateoftheartcnnoptimizerforbraintumorsegmentationinmagneticresonanceimages AT fengjinchao stateoftheartcnnoptimizerforbraintumorsegmentationinmagneticresonanceimages AT ziamsultan stateoftheartcnnoptimizerforbraintumorsegmentationinmagneticresonanceimages AT arshidkaleem stateoftheartcnnoptimizerforbraintumorsegmentationinmagneticresonanceimages AT jiakebin stateoftheartcnnoptimizerforbraintumorsegmentationinmagneticresonanceimages AT rehmanzakaur stateoftheartcnnoptimizerforbraintumorsegmentationinmagneticresonanceimages AT mehmoodatif stateoftheartcnnoptimizerforbraintumorsegmentationinmagneticresonanceimages |