Cargando…

State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images

Brain tumors have become a leading cause of death around the globe. The main reason for this epidemic is the difficulty conducting a timely diagnosis of the tumor. Fortunately, magnetic resonance images (MRI) are utilized to diagnose tumors in most cases. The performance of a Convolutional Neural Ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yaqub, Muhammad, Feng, Jinchao, Zia, M. Sultan, Arshid, Kaleem, Jia, Kebin, Rehman, Zaka Ur, Mehmood, Atif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32635409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10070427
_version_ 1783567681081835520
author Yaqub, Muhammad
Feng, Jinchao
Zia, M. Sultan
Arshid, Kaleem
Jia, Kebin
Rehman, Zaka Ur
Mehmood, Atif
author_facet Yaqub, Muhammad
Feng, Jinchao
Zia, M. Sultan
Arshid, Kaleem
Jia, Kebin
Rehman, Zaka Ur
Mehmood, Atif
author_sort Yaqub, Muhammad
collection PubMed
description Brain tumors have become a leading cause of death around the globe. The main reason for this epidemic is the difficulty conducting a timely diagnosis of the tumor. Fortunately, magnetic resonance images (MRI) are utilized to diagnose tumors in most cases. The performance of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) depends on many factors (i.e., weight initialization, optimization, batches and epochs, learning rate, activation function, loss function, and network topology), data quality, and specific combinations of these model attributes. When we deal with a segmentation or classification problem, utilizing a single optimizer is considered weak testing or validity unless the decision of the selection of an optimizer is backed up by a strong argument. Therefore, optimizer selection processes are considered important to validate the usage of a single optimizer in order to attain these decision problems. In this paper, we provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of popular optimizers of CNN to benchmark the segmentation for improvement. In detail, we perform a comparative analysis of 10 different state-of-the-art gradient descent-based optimizers, namely Adaptive Gradient (Adagrad), Adaptive Delta (AdaDelta), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Adaptive Momentum (Adam), Cyclic Learning Rate (CLR), Adaptive Max Pooling (Adamax), Root Mean Square Propagation (RMS Prop), Nesterov Adaptive Momentum (Nadam), and Nesterov accelerated gradient (NAG) for CNN. The experiments were performed on the BraTS2015 data set. The Adam optimizer had the best accuracy of 99.2% in enhancing the CNN ability in classification and segmentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7407771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74077712020-08-12 State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images Yaqub, Muhammad Feng, Jinchao Zia, M. Sultan Arshid, Kaleem Jia, Kebin Rehman, Zaka Ur Mehmood, Atif Brain Sci Article Brain tumors have become a leading cause of death around the globe. The main reason for this epidemic is the difficulty conducting a timely diagnosis of the tumor. Fortunately, magnetic resonance images (MRI) are utilized to diagnose tumors in most cases. The performance of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) depends on many factors (i.e., weight initialization, optimization, batches and epochs, learning rate, activation function, loss function, and network topology), data quality, and specific combinations of these model attributes. When we deal with a segmentation or classification problem, utilizing a single optimizer is considered weak testing or validity unless the decision of the selection of an optimizer is backed up by a strong argument. Therefore, optimizer selection processes are considered important to validate the usage of a single optimizer in order to attain these decision problems. In this paper, we provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of popular optimizers of CNN to benchmark the segmentation for improvement. In detail, we perform a comparative analysis of 10 different state-of-the-art gradient descent-based optimizers, namely Adaptive Gradient (Adagrad), Adaptive Delta (AdaDelta), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Adaptive Momentum (Adam), Cyclic Learning Rate (CLR), Adaptive Max Pooling (Adamax), Root Mean Square Propagation (RMS Prop), Nesterov Adaptive Momentum (Nadam), and Nesterov accelerated gradient (NAG) for CNN. The experiments were performed on the BraTS2015 data set. The Adam optimizer had the best accuracy of 99.2% in enhancing the CNN ability in classification and segmentation. MDPI 2020-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7407771/ /pubmed/32635409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10070427 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yaqub, Muhammad
Feng, Jinchao
Zia, M. Sultan
Arshid, Kaleem
Jia, Kebin
Rehman, Zaka Ur
Mehmood, Atif
State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images
title State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images
title_full State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images
title_fullStr State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images
title_full_unstemmed State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images
title_short State-of-the-Art CNN Optimizer for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Images
title_sort state-of-the-art cnn optimizer for brain tumor segmentation in magnetic resonance images
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7407771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32635409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10070427
work_keys_str_mv AT yaqubmuhammad stateoftheartcnnoptimizerforbraintumorsegmentationinmagneticresonanceimages
AT fengjinchao stateoftheartcnnoptimizerforbraintumorsegmentationinmagneticresonanceimages
AT ziamsultan stateoftheartcnnoptimizerforbraintumorsegmentationinmagneticresonanceimages
AT arshidkaleem stateoftheartcnnoptimizerforbraintumorsegmentationinmagneticresonanceimages
AT jiakebin stateoftheartcnnoptimizerforbraintumorsegmentationinmagneticresonanceimages
AT rehmanzakaur stateoftheartcnnoptimizerforbraintumorsegmentationinmagneticresonanceimages
AT mehmoodatif stateoftheartcnnoptimizerforbraintumorsegmentationinmagneticresonanceimages