Cargando…

A Retrospective Comparison of DLI and gDLI for Post-Transplant Treatment

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is used to prevent or treat haematological malignancies relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulated factor primed DLI (gDLI) is derived from frozen aliquots of the peripheral blood stem cell collection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamure, Sylvain, Paul, Franciane, Gagez, Anne-Laure, Delage, Jérémy, Vincent, Laure, Fegueux, Nathalie, Sirvent, Anne, Gehlkopf, Eve, Veyrune, Jean Luc, Yang, Lu Zhao, Kanouni, Tarik, Cacheux, Valère, Moreaux, Jérôme, Bonafoux, Beatrice, Cartron, Guillaume, De Vos, John, Ceballos, Patrice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7408819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664688
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072204
_version_ 1783567920480124928
author Lamure, Sylvain
Paul, Franciane
Gagez, Anne-Laure
Delage, Jérémy
Vincent, Laure
Fegueux, Nathalie
Sirvent, Anne
Gehlkopf, Eve
Veyrune, Jean Luc
Yang, Lu Zhao
Kanouni, Tarik
Cacheux, Valère
Moreaux, Jérôme
Bonafoux, Beatrice
Cartron, Guillaume
De Vos, John
Ceballos, Patrice
author_facet Lamure, Sylvain
Paul, Franciane
Gagez, Anne-Laure
Delage, Jérémy
Vincent, Laure
Fegueux, Nathalie
Sirvent, Anne
Gehlkopf, Eve
Veyrune, Jean Luc
Yang, Lu Zhao
Kanouni, Tarik
Cacheux, Valère
Moreaux, Jérôme
Bonafoux, Beatrice
Cartron, Guillaume
De Vos, John
Ceballos, Patrice
author_sort Lamure, Sylvain
collection PubMed
description Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is used to prevent or treat haematological malignancies relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulated factor primed DLI (gDLI) is derived from frozen aliquots of the peripheral blood stem cell collection. We compared the efficacy and safety of gDLI and classical DLI after allo-SCT. We excluded haploidentical allo-SCT. Initial diseases were acute myeloblastic leukaemia (n = 45), myeloma (n = 38), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (n = 20), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 10), myelodysplasia (n = 8), Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 8), chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (n = 7), chronic myeloid leukaemia (n = 2) and osteomyelofibrosis (n = 1). Indications for DLI were relapse (n = 96) or pre-emptive treatment (n = 43). Sixty-eight patients had classical DLI and 71 had gDLI. The response rate was 38.2%, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 38% (29–48) and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 37% (29–47). Graft versus host disease rate was 46.7% and 10.1% of patients died from toxicity. There were no differences between classical DLI and gDLI in terms of response (p = 0.28), 5-year PFS (p = 0.90), 5-year OS (p. 0.50), GvHD (p = 0.86), treated GvHD (p = 0.81) and cause of mortality (p. 0.14). In conclusion, this study points out no major effectiveness or toxicity of gDLI compared to classical DLI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7408819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74088192020-08-13 A Retrospective Comparison of DLI and gDLI for Post-Transplant Treatment Lamure, Sylvain Paul, Franciane Gagez, Anne-Laure Delage, Jérémy Vincent, Laure Fegueux, Nathalie Sirvent, Anne Gehlkopf, Eve Veyrune, Jean Luc Yang, Lu Zhao Kanouni, Tarik Cacheux, Valère Moreaux, Jérôme Bonafoux, Beatrice Cartron, Guillaume De Vos, John Ceballos, Patrice J Clin Med Article Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is used to prevent or treat haematological malignancies relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulated factor primed DLI (gDLI) is derived from frozen aliquots of the peripheral blood stem cell collection. We compared the efficacy and safety of gDLI and classical DLI after allo-SCT. We excluded haploidentical allo-SCT. Initial diseases were acute myeloblastic leukaemia (n = 45), myeloma (n = 38), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (n = 20), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 10), myelodysplasia (n = 8), Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 8), chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (n = 7), chronic myeloid leukaemia (n = 2) and osteomyelofibrosis (n = 1). Indications for DLI were relapse (n = 96) or pre-emptive treatment (n = 43). Sixty-eight patients had classical DLI and 71 had gDLI. The response rate was 38.2%, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 38% (29–48) and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 37% (29–47). Graft versus host disease rate was 46.7% and 10.1% of patients died from toxicity. There were no differences between classical DLI and gDLI in terms of response (p = 0.28), 5-year PFS (p = 0.90), 5-year OS (p. 0.50), GvHD (p = 0.86), treated GvHD (p = 0.81) and cause of mortality (p. 0.14). In conclusion, this study points out no major effectiveness or toxicity of gDLI compared to classical DLI. MDPI 2020-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7408819/ /pubmed/32664688 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072204 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lamure, Sylvain
Paul, Franciane
Gagez, Anne-Laure
Delage, Jérémy
Vincent, Laure
Fegueux, Nathalie
Sirvent, Anne
Gehlkopf, Eve
Veyrune, Jean Luc
Yang, Lu Zhao
Kanouni, Tarik
Cacheux, Valère
Moreaux, Jérôme
Bonafoux, Beatrice
Cartron, Guillaume
De Vos, John
Ceballos, Patrice
A Retrospective Comparison of DLI and gDLI for Post-Transplant Treatment
title A Retrospective Comparison of DLI and gDLI for Post-Transplant Treatment
title_full A Retrospective Comparison of DLI and gDLI for Post-Transplant Treatment
title_fullStr A Retrospective Comparison of DLI and gDLI for Post-Transplant Treatment
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Comparison of DLI and gDLI for Post-Transplant Treatment
title_short A Retrospective Comparison of DLI and gDLI for Post-Transplant Treatment
title_sort retrospective comparison of dli and gdli for post-transplant treatment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7408819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664688
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072204
work_keys_str_mv AT lamuresylvain aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT paulfranciane aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT gagezannelaure aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT delagejeremy aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT vincentlaure aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT fegueuxnathalie aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT sirventanne aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT gehlkopfeve aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT veyrunejeanluc aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT yangluzhao aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT kanounitarik aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT cacheuxvalere aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT moreauxjerome aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT bonafouxbeatrice aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT cartronguillaume aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT devosjohn aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT ceballospatrice aretrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT lamuresylvain retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT paulfranciane retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT gagezannelaure retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT delagejeremy retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT vincentlaure retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT fegueuxnathalie retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT sirventanne retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT gehlkopfeve retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT veyrunejeanluc retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT yangluzhao retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT kanounitarik retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT cacheuxvalere retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT moreauxjerome retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT bonafouxbeatrice retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT cartronguillaume retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT devosjohn retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment
AT ceballospatrice retrospectivecomparisonofdliandgdliforposttransplanttreatment