Cargando…
Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)–Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept: A Full-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Solution with 3 Years of Follow-Up
Background: The aim of this three-year prospective study was to examine the outcome of a solution for full-arch rehabilitation through a fixed implant-supported hybrid prosthesis (polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-acrylic resin) used in conjunction with the All-on-4 concept. Methods: Thirty-seven patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7408851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072187 |
_version_ | 1783567927883071488 |
---|---|
author | de Araújo Nobre, Miguel Moura Guedes, Carlos Almeida, Ricardo Silva, António Sereno, Nuno |
author_facet | de Araújo Nobre, Miguel Moura Guedes, Carlos Almeida, Ricardo Silva, António Sereno, Nuno |
author_sort | de Araújo Nobre, Miguel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The aim of this three-year prospective study was to examine the outcome of a solution for full-arch rehabilitation through a fixed implant-supported hybrid prosthesis (polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-acrylic resin) used in conjunction with the All-on-4 concept. Methods: Thirty-seven patients (29 females, 8 males), with an age range of 38 to 78 years (average: 59.8 years) were rehabilitated with 49 full-arch implant-supported prostheses (12 maxillary rehabilitations, 13 mandibular rehabilitations and 12 bimaxillary rehabilitations). The primary outcome measure was prosthetic survival. Secondary outcome measures were marginal bone loss, plaque and bleeding scores, veneer adhesion issues, biological complications, mechanical complications, and the patients’ subjective evaluation. Results: There were two patients (maxillary rehabilitations) lost to follow-up, while one patient withdrew (maxillary rehabilitation). One patient with bimaxillary rehabilitation fractured the mandibular PEEK framework, rendering a 98% prosthetic survival rate. Implant survival was 100%. Average (standard deviation) marginal bone loss at 3-years was 0.40 mm (0.73 mm). Veneer adhesion was the only technical complication (n = 8 patients), resolved for all patients. Nine patients (n = 11 prostheses) experienced mechanical complications (all resolved): fracture of acrylic resin crowns (n = 3 patients), prosthetic and abutment screw loosening (n = 4 patients and 3 patients, respectively), abutment wearing (n = 1 patient). One patient experienced a biological complication (peri-implant pathology), resolved through non-surgical therapy. A 90% satisfaction rate was registered for the patients’ subjective evaluation. Conclusions: Based on the results, the three-year outcome suggests the proposed rehabilitation solution as a legitimate treatment option, providing a potential shock-absorbing alternative that could benefit the implant biological outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7408851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74088512020-08-13 Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)–Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept: A Full-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Solution with 3 Years of Follow-Up de Araújo Nobre, Miguel Moura Guedes, Carlos Almeida, Ricardo Silva, António Sereno, Nuno J Clin Med Article Background: The aim of this three-year prospective study was to examine the outcome of a solution for full-arch rehabilitation through a fixed implant-supported hybrid prosthesis (polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-acrylic resin) used in conjunction with the All-on-4 concept. Methods: Thirty-seven patients (29 females, 8 males), with an age range of 38 to 78 years (average: 59.8 years) were rehabilitated with 49 full-arch implant-supported prostheses (12 maxillary rehabilitations, 13 mandibular rehabilitations and 12 bimaxillary rehabilitations). The primary outcome measure was prosthetic survival. Secondary outcome measures were marginal bone loss, plaque and bleeding scores, veneer adhesion issues, biological complications, mechanical complications, and the patients’ subjective evaluation. Results: There were two patients (maxillary rehabilitations) lost to follow-up, while one patient withdrew (maxillary rehabilitation). One patient with bimaxillary rehabilitation fractured the mandibular PEEK framework, rendering a 98% prosthetic survival rate. Implant survival was 100%. Average (standard deviation) marginal bone loss at 3-years was 0.40 mm (0.73 mm). Veneer adhesion was the only technical complication (n = 8 patients), resolved for all patients. Nine patients (n = 11 prostheses) experienced mechanical complications (all resolved): fracture of acrylic resin crowns (n = 3 patients), prosthetic and abutment screw loosening (n = 4 patients and 3 patients, respectively), abutment wearing (n = 1 patient). One patient experienced a biological complication (peri-implant pathology), resolved through non-surgical therapy. A 90% satisfaction rate was registered for the patients’ subjective evaluation. Conclusions: Based on the results, the three-year outcome suggests the proposed rehabilitation solution as a legitimate treatment option, providing a potential shock-absorbing alternative that could benefit the implant biological outcome. MDPI 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7408851/ /pubmed/32664393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072187 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article de Araújo Nobre, Miguel Moura Guedes, Carlos Almeida, Ricardo Silva, António Sereno, Nuno Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)–Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept: A Full-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Solution with 3 Years of Follow-Up |
title | Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)–Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept: A Full-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Solution with 3 Years of Follow-Up |
title_full | Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)–Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept: A Full-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Solution with 3 Years of Follow-Up |
title_fullStr | Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)–Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept: A Full-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Solution with 3 Years of Follow-Up |
title_full_unstemmed | Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)–Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept: A Full-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Solution with 3 Years of Follow-Up |
title_short | Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)–Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept: A Full-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Solution with 3 Years of Follow-Up |
title_sort | hybrid polyetheretherketone (peek)–acrylic resin prostheses and the all-on-4 concept: a full-arch implant-supported fixed solution with 3 years of follow-up |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7408851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dearaujonobremiguel hybridpolyetheretherketonepeekacrylicresinprosthesesandtheallon4conceptafullarchimplantsupportedfixedsolutionwith3yearsoffollowup AT mouraguedescarlos hybridpolyetheretherketonepeekacrylicresinprosthesesandtheallon4conceptafullarchimplantsupportedfixedsolutionwith3yearsoffollowup AT almeidaricardo hybridpolyetheretherketonepeekacrylicresinprosthesesandtheallon4conceptafullarchimplantsupportedfixedsolutionwith3yearsoffollowup AT silvaantonio hybridpolyetheretherketonepeekacrylicresinprosthesesandtheallon4conceptafullarchimplantsupportedfixedsolutionwith3yearsoffollowup AT serenonuno hybridpolyetheretherketonepeekacrylicresinprosthesesandtheallon4conceptafullarchimplantsupportedfixedsolutionwith3yearsoffollowup |