Cargando…

Drug Tissue Distribution of TUDCA From a Biodegradable Suprachoroidal Implant versus Intravitreal or Systemic Delivery in the Pig Model

PURPOSE: To determine local ocular tissue levels of the bile acid, tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA), in the pig model using oral, intravenous (IV), intravitreal injection (IVitI) and low- and high-dose suprachoroidal, sustained-release implants (SCI-L or SCI-H). METHODS: Forty-six pigs (92 globes)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olsen, Timothy W., Dyer, Roy B., Mano, Fukutaro, Boatright, Jeffrey H., Chrenek, Micah A., Paley, Daniel, Wabner, Kathy, Schmit, Jenn, Chae, Ju Byung, Sellers, Jana T., Singh, Ravinder J., Wiedmann, Timothy S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7408862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.6.11
_version_ 1783567930454179840
author Olsen, Timothy W.
Dyer, Roy B.
Mano, Fukutaro
Boatright, Jeffrey H.
Chrenek, Micah A.
Paley, Daniel
Wabner, Kathy
Schmit, Jenn
Chae, Ju Byung
Sellers, Jana T.
Singh, Ravinder J.
Wiedmann, Timothy S.
author_facet Olsen, Timothy W.
Dyer, Roy B.
Mano, Fukutaro
Boatright, Jeffrey H.
Chrenek, Micah A.
Paley, Daniel
Wabner, Kathy
Schmit, Jenn
Chae, Ju Byung
Sellers, Jana T.
Singh, Ravinder J.
Wiedmann, Timothy S.
author_sort Olsen, Timothy W.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine local ocular tissue levels of the bile acid, tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA), in the pig model using oral, intravenous (IV), intravitreal injection (IVitI) and low- and high-dose suprachoroidal, sustained-release implants (SCI-L or SCI-H). METHODS: Forty-six pigs (92 globes) were included in the study. TUDCA was delivered orally in 5 pigs, IV in 4, IVitI in 6, SCI-L in 17, and SCI-H in 14. Testing timeframes varied from the same day (within minutes) for IV; 1 to 6 days, oral; and 1 to 4 weeks, IVitI and SCI. Enucleated globes were dissected, specimens from specific tissues were separated, and TUDCA was extracted and quantified using mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The highest TUDCA tissue levels occurred after IV delivery in the macula (252 ± 238 nM) and peripheral retina (196 ± 171 nM). Macular choroid and peripheral choroid levels were also high (1032 ± 1269 and 1219 ± 1486 nM, respectively). For IVitI delivery, macular levels at day 6 were low (0.5 ± 0.5 nM), whereas peripheral choroid was higher (15.3 ± 16.7 nM). Neither the SCI-L nor SCI-H implants delivered meaningful macular doses (≤1 nM); however, peripheral retina and choroid levels were significantly higher. Bile acid isoforms were found in the serum specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The highest TUDCA tissue levels in the pig model were obtained using IV delivery. Oral delivery was associated with reasonable tissue levels. Local delivery (IVitI and SCI) was able to achieve measurable local ocular tissue levels. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Diffusional kinetics from the suprachoroidal space follow the choroidal blood flow, away from the macula and toward the periphery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7408862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74088622020-08-19 Drug Tissue Distribution of TUDCA From a Biodegradable Suprachoroidal Implant versus Intravitreal or Systemic Delivery in the Pig Model Olsen, Timothy W. Dyer, Roy B. Mano, Fukutaro Boatright, Jeffrey H. Chrenek, Micah A. Paley, Daniel Wabner, Kathy Schmit, Jenn Chae, Ju Byung Sellers, Jana T. Singh, Ravinder J. Wiedmann, Timothy S. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To determine local ocular tissue levels of the bile acid, tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA), in the pig model using oral, intravenous (IV), intravitreal injection (IVitI) and low- and high-dose suprachoroidal, sustained-release implants (SCI-L or SCI-H). METHODS: Forty-six pigs (92 globes) were included in the study. TUDCA was delivered orally in 5 pigs, IV in 4, IVitI in 6, SCI-L in 17, and SCI-H in 14. Testing timeframes varied from the same day (within minutes) for IV; 1 to 6 days, oral; and 1 to 4 weeks, IVitI and SCI. Enucleated globes were dissected, specimens from specific tissues were separated, and TUDCA was extracted and quantified using mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The highest TUDCA tissue levels occurred after IV delivery in the macula (252 ± 238 nM) and peripheral retina (196 ± 171 nM). Macular choroid and peripheral choroid levels were also high (1032 ± 1269 and 1219 ± 1486 nM, respectively). For IVitI delivery, macular levels at day 6 were low (0.5 ± 0.5 nM), whereas peripheral choroid was higher (15.3 ± 16.7 nM). Neither the SCI-L nor SCI-H implants delivered meaningful macular doses (≤1 nM); however, peripheral retina and choroid levels were significantly higher. Bile acid isoforms were found in the serum specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The highest TUDCA tissue levels in the pig model were obtained using IV delivery. Oral delivery was associated with reasonable tissue levels. Local delivery (IVitI and SCI) was able to achieve measurable local ocular tissue levels. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Diffusional kinetics from the suprachoroidal space follow the choroidal blood flow, away from the macula and toward the periphery. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7408862/ /pubmed/32821508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.6.11 Text en Copyright 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Olsen, Timothy W.
Dyer, Roy B.
Mano, Fukutaro
Boatright, Jeffrey H.
Chrenek, Micah A.
Paley, Daniel
Wabner, Kathy
Schmit, Jenn
Chae, Ju Byung
Sellers, Jana T.
Singh, Ravinder J.
Wiedmann, Timothy S.
Drug Tissue Distribution of TUDCA From a Biodegradable Suprachoroidal Implant versus Intravitreal or Systemic Delivery in the Pig Model
title Drug Tissue Distribution of TUDCA From a Biodegradable Suprachoroidal Implant versus Intravitreal or Systemic Delivery in the Pig Model
title_full Drug Tissue Distribution of TUDCA From a Biodegradable Suprachoroidal Implant versus Intravitreal or Systemic Delivery in the Pig Model
title_fullStr Drug Tissue Distribution of TUDCA From a Biodegradable Suprachoroidal Implant versus Intravitreal or Systemic Delivery in the Pig Model
title_full_unstemmed Drug Tissue Distribution of TUDCA From a Biodegradable Suprachoroidal Implant versus Intravitreal or Systemic Delivery in the Pig Model
title_short Drug Tissue Distribution of TUDCA From a Biodegradable Suprachoroidal Implant versus Intravitreal or Systemic Delivery in the Pig Model
title_sort drug tissue distribution of tudca from a biodegradable suprachoroidal implant versus intravitreal or systemic delivery in the pig model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7408862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.6.11
work_keys_str_mv AT olsentimothyw drugtissuedistributionoftudcafromabiodegradablesuprachoroidalimplantversusintravitrealorsystemicdeliveryinthepigmodel
AT dyerroyb drugtissuedistributionoftudcafromabiodegradablesuprachoroidalimplantversusintravitrealorsystemicdeliveryinthepigmodel
AT manofukutaro drugtissuedistributionoftudcafromabiodegradablesuprachoroidalimplantversusintravitrealorsystemicdeliveryinthepigmodel
AT boatrightjeffreyh drugtissuedistributionoftudcafromabiodegradablesuprachoroidalimplantversusintravitrealorsystemicdeliveryinthepigmodel
AT chrenekmicaha drugtissuedistributionoftudcafromabiodegradablesuprachoroidalimplantversusintravitrealorsystemicdeliveryinthepigmodel
AT paleydaniel drugtissuedistributionoftudcafromabiodegradablesuprachoroidalimplantversusintravitrealorsystemicdeliveryinthepigmodel
AT wabnerkathy drugtissuedistributionoftudcafromabiodegradablesuprachoroidalimplantversusintravitrealorsystemicdeliveryinthepigmodel
AT schmitjenn drugtissuedistributionoftudcafromabiodegradablesuprachoroidalimplantversusintravitrealorsystemicdeliveryinthepigmodel
AT chaejubyung drugtissuedistributionoftudcafromabiodegradablesuprachoroidalimplantversusintravitrealorsystemicdeliveryinthepigmodel
AT sellersjanat drugtissuedistributionoftudcafromabiodegradablesuprachoroidalimplantversusintravitrealorsystemicdeliveryinthepigmodel
AT singhravinderj drugtissuedistributionoftudcafromabiodegradablesuprachoroidalimplantversusintravitrealorsystemicdeliveryinthepigmodel
AT wiedmanntimothys drugtissuedistributionoftudcafromabiodegradablesuprachoroidalimplantversusintravitrealorsystemicdeliveryinthepigmodel