Cargando…
Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place?
Novel drugs have improved survival for patients with multiple myeloma in recent years. However, the disease is still fatal. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo) has proven to cure some patients with the disease, but its role is controversial due to relatively high transplant-related toxicity...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7408931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072180 |
_version_ | 1783567946561355776 |
---|---|
author | Gahrton, Gösta Iacobelli, Simona Garderet, Laurent Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim Schönland, Stefan |
author_facet | Gahrton, Gösta Iacobelli, Simona Garderet, Laurent Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim Schönland, Stefan |
author_sort | Gahrton, Gösta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Novel drugs have improved survival for patients with multiple myeloma in recent years. However, the disease is still fatal. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo) has proven to cure some patients with the disease, but its role is controversial due to relatively high transplant-related toxicity and mortality (nonrelapse mortality, NRM). Using nonmyeloablative reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), both toxicity and NRM can be reduced, and RICAllo is, therefore, an option for subgroups of patients. Upfront tandem autologous/RICAllo (Auto/RICAllo) was shown to be superior to single Auto or tandem Auto/Auto in both progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in two prospective studies with long-term follow-up, while three similarly designed studies did not detect a difference. A recent update of pooled patient data from four of these studies showed significantly superior PFS and OS with Auto/RICAllo. Importantly, none of these studies showed inferior results with Auto/RICAllo in patients less than 70 years of age. Auto/RICAllo appears to overcome some poor risk cytogenetic markers. Encouraging results have also been seen in treatment of relapsed patients. Combining Allo with new proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs may further improve results. Other encouraging new cell therapies such as with CAR T-cells, NK- and CAR NK-cells may well have a place in combination with RICAllo. Such studies are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7408931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74089312020-08-13 Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place? Gahrton, Gösta Iacobelli, Simona Garderet, Laurent Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim Schönland, Stefan J Clin Med Review Novel drugs have improved survival for patients with multiple myeloma in recent years. However, the disease is still fatal. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo) has proven to cure some patients with the disease, but its role is controversial due to relatively high transplant-related toxicity and mortality (nonrelapse mortality, NRM). Using nonmyeloablative reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), both toxicity and NRM can be reduced, and RICAllo is, therefore, an option for subgroups of patients. Upfront tandem autologous/RICAllo (Auto/RICAllo) was shown to be superior to single Auto or tandem Auto/Auto in both progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in two prospective studies with long-term follow-up, while three similarly designed studies did not detect a difference. A recent update of pooled patient data from four of these studies showed significantly superior PFS and OS with Auto/RICAllo. Importantly, none of these studies showed inferior results with Auto/RICAllo in patients less than 70 years of age. Auto/RICAllo appears to overcome some poor risk cytogenetic markers. Encouraging results have also been seen in treatment of relapsed patients. Combining Allo with new proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs may further improve results. Other encouraging new cell therapies such as with CAR T-cells, NK- and CAR NK-cells may well have a place in combination with RICAllo. Such studies are warranted. MDPI 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7408931/ /pubmed/32664274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072180 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Gahrton, Gösta Iacobelli, Simona Garderet, Laurent Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim Schönland, Stefan Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place? |
title | Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place? |
title_full | Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place? |
title_fullStr | Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place? |
title_full_unstemmed | Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place? |
title_short | Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place? |
title_sort | allogeneic transplantation in multiple myeloma—does it still have a place? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7408931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072180 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gahrtongosta allogeneictransplantationinmultiplemyelomadoesitstillhaveaplace AT iacobellisimona allogeneictransplantationinmultiplemyelomadoesitstillhaveaplace AT garderetlaurent allogeneictransplantationinmultiplemyelomadoesitstillhaveaplace AT yakoubaghaibrahim allogeneictransplantationinmultiplemyelomadoesitstillhaveaplace AT schonlandstefan allogeneictransplantationinmultiplemyelomadoesitstillhaveaplace |