Cargando…

Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place?

Novel drugs have improved survival for patients with multiple myeloma in recent years. However, the disease is still fatal. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo) has proven to cure some patients with the disease, but its role is controversial due to relatively high transplant-related toxicity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gahrton, Gösta, Iacobelli, Simona, Garderet, Laurent, Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim, Schönland, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7408931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072180
_version_ 1783567946561355776
author Gahrton, Gösta
Iacobelli, Simona
Garderet, Laurent
Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim
Schönland, Stefan
author_facet Gahrton, Gösta
Iacobelli, Simona
Garderet, Laurent
Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim
Schönland, Stefan
author_sort Gahrton, Gösta
collection PubMed
description Novel drugs have improved survival for patients with multiple myeloma in recent years. However, the disease is still fatal. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo) has proven to cure some patients with the disease, but its role is controversial due to relatively high transplant-related toxicity and mortality (nonrelapse mortality, NRM). Using nonmyeloablative reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), both toxicity and NRM can be reduced, and RICAllo is, therefore, an option for subgroups of patients. Upfront tandem autologous/RICAllo (Auto/RICAllo) was shown to be superior to single Auto or tandem Auto/Auto in both progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in two prospective studies with long-term follow-up, while three similarly designed studies did not detect a difference. A recent update of pooled patient data from four of these studies showed significantly superior PFS and OS with Auto/RICAllo. Importantly, none of these studies showed inferior results with Auto/RICAllo in patients less than 70 years of age. Auto/RICAllo appears to overcome some poor risk cytogenetic markers. Encouraging results have also been seen in treatment of relapsed patients. Combining Allo with new proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs may further improve results. Other encouraging new cell therapies such as with CAR T-cells, NK- and CAR NK-cells may well have a place in combination with RICAllo. Such studies are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7408931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74089312020-08-13 Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place? Gahrton, Gösta Iacobelli, Simona Garderet, Laurent Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim Schönland, Stefan J Clin Med Review Novel drugs have improved survival for patients with multiple myeloma in recent years. However, the disease is still fatal. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo) has proven to cure some patients with the disease, but its role is controversial due to relatively high transplant-related toxicity and mortality (nonrelapse mortality, NRM). Using nonmyeloablative reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), both toxicity and NRM can be reduced, and RICAllo is, therefore, an option for subgroups of patients. Upfront tandem autologous/RICAllo (Auto/RICAllo) was shown to be superior to single Auto or tandem Auto/Auto in both progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in two prospective studies with long-term follow-up, while three similarly designed studies did not detect a difference. A recent update of pooled patient data from four of these studies showed significantly superior PFS and OS with Auto/RICAllo. Importantly, none of these studies showed inferior results with Auto/RICAllo in patients less than 70 years of age. Auto/RICAllo appears to overcome some poor risk cytogenetic markers. Encouraging results have also been seen in treatment of relapsed patients. Combining Allo with new proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs may further improve results. Other encouraging new cell therapies such as with CAR T-cells, NK- and CAR NK-cells may well have a place in combination with RICAllo. Such studies are warranted. MDPI 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7408931/ /pubmed/32664274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072180 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Gahrton, Gösta
Iacobelli, Simona
Garderet, Laurent
Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim
Schönland, Stefan
Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place?
title Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place?
title_full Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place?
title_fullStr Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place?
title_full_unstemmed Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place?
title_short Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma—Does It Still Have a Place?
title_sort allogeneic transplantation in multiple myeloma—does it still have a place?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7408931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072180
work_keys_str_mv AT gahrtongosta allogeneictransplantationinmultiplemyelomadoesitstillhaveaplace
AT iacobellisimona allogeneictransplantationinmultiplemyelomadoesitstillhaveaplace
AT garderetlaurent allogeneictransplantationinmultiplemyelomadoesitstillhaveaplace
AT yakoubaghaibrahim allogeneictransplantationinmultiplemyelomadoesitstillhaveaplace
AT schonlandstefan allogeneictransplantationinmultiplemyelomadoesitstillhaveaplace