Cargando…

The Effect of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Lung Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients with Burn: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Study

We performed pulmonary function (PF) tests and factors affecting PF evaluation in 120 patients with inhalation injury to evaluate the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in burn patients with inhalation injury. Patients were randomized into pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) group and conventional r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Won, Yu Hui, Cho, Yoon Soo, Joo, So Young, Seo, Cheong Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32679866
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072250
_version_ 1783567965780705280
author Won, Yu Hui
Cho, Yoon Soo
Joo, So Young
Seo, Cheong Hoon
author_facet Won, Yu Hui
Cho, Yoon Soo
Joo, So Young
Seo, Cheong Hoon
author_sort Won, Yu Hui
collection PubMed
description We performed pulmonary function (PF) tests and factors affecting PF evaluation in 120 patients with inhalation injury to evaluate the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in burn patients with inhalation injury. Patients were randomized into pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) group and conventional rehabilitation (CON) group. PF tests, including forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-s forced expiratory volume FEV1), maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV), and respiratory muscles strength (maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP)), were measured by mouth pressure meter in the sitting position. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) was determined by the single-breath carbon monoxide technique. Peak cough flow (PCF) was measured by a peak flow meter. Diaphragmatic mobility (DM) was evaluated on anteroposterior fluoroscopy. All evaluations were performed in all groups at baseline and after 12 weeks. There were no differences in evaluations between the PR group and CON group before the intervention. There were significant improvements in the PCF and MIP (%) changes, taken before and after rehabilitation in the PR group, compared with the changes in the CON group (p = 0.01, and p = 0.04). There were no significant changes in the other parameters in the PR group compared with the changes in the CON group (p > 0.05). There were significant differences in DLco (%), MIP, MIP (%), and DM between the PR group and the CON group (p = 0.02, p = 0.005, and p = 0.001) after 12 weeks of rehabilitation. There were no differences between the PR group and CON group after 12 weeks rehabilitation in the other parameters (p > 0.05). PR for patients with major burns and smoke inhalation induced improved PCF, MIP, MIP (%), DLco (%), and DM. These results show that PR should be a fundamental component of the treatment program for patients with burns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7409013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74090132020-08-26 The Effect of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Lung Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients with Burn: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Study Won, Yu Hui Cho, Yoon Soo Joo, So Young Seo, Cheong Hoon J Clin Med Article We performed pulmonary function (PF) tests and factors affecting PF evaluation in 120 patients with inhalation injury to evaluate the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in burn patients with inhalation injury. Patients were randomized into pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) group and conventional rehabilitation (CON) group. PF tests, including forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-s forced expiratory volume FEV1), maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV), and respiratory muscles strength (maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP)), were measured by mouth pressure meter in the sitting position. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) was determined by the single-breath carbon monoxide technique. Peak cough flow (PCF) was measured by a peak flow meter. Diaphragmatic mobility (DM) was evaluated on anteroposterior fluoroscopy. All evaluations were performed in all groups at baseline and after 12 weeks. There were no differences in evaluations between the PR group and CON group before the intervention. There were significant improvements in the PCF and MIP (%) changes, taken before and after rehabilitation in the PR group, compared with the changes in the CON group (p = 0.01, and p = 0.04). There were no significant changes in the other parameters in the PR group compared with the changes in the CON group (p > 0.05). There were significant differences in DLco (%), MIP, MIP (%), and DM between the PR group and the CON group (p = 0.02, p = 0.005, and p = 0.001) after 12 weeks of rehabilitation. There were no differences between the PR group and CON group after 12 weeks rehabilitation in the other parameters (p > 0.05). PR for patients with major burns and smoke inhalation induced improved PCF, MIP, MIP (%), DLco (%), and DM. These results show that PR should be a fundamental component of the treatment program for patients with burns. MDPI 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7409013/ /pubmed/32679866 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072250 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Won, Yu Hui
Cho, Yoon Soo
Joo, So Young
Seo, Cheong Hoon
The Effect of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Lung Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients with Burn: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Study
title The Effect of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Lung Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients with Burn: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Study
title_full The Effect of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Lung Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients with Burn: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Study
title_fullStr The Effect of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Lung Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients with Burn: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Study
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Lung Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients with Burn: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Study
title_short The Effect of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Lung Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients with Burn: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Study
title_sort effect of a pulmonary rehabilitation on lung function and exercise capacity in patients with burn: a prospective randomized single-blind study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32679866
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072250
work_keys_str_mv AT wonyuhui theeffectofapulmonaryrehabilitationonlungfunctionandexercisecapacityinpatientswithburnaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindstudy
AT choyoonsoo theeffectofapulmonaryrehabilitationonlungfunctionandexercisecapacityinpatientswithburnaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindstudy
AT joosoyoung theeffectofapulmonaryrehabilitationonlungfunctionandexercisecapacityinpatientswithburnaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindstudy
AT seocheonghoon theeffectofapulmonaryrehabilitationonlungfunctionandexercisecapacityinpatientswithburnaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindstudy
AT wonyuhui effectofapulmonaryrehabilitationonlungfunctionandexercisecapacityinpatientswithburnaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindstudy
AT choyoonsoo effectofapulmonaryrehabilitationonlungfunctionandexercisecapacityinpatientswithburnaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindstudy
AT joosoyoung effectofapulmonaryrehabilitationonlungfunctionandexercisecapacityinpatientswithburnaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindstudy
AT seocheonghoon effectofapulmonaryrehabilitationonlungfunctionandexercisecapacityinpatientswithburnaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindstudy