Cargando…

Analysis of Tick Surface Decontamination Methods

Various microbial pathogens have been found in ticks such as Ixodes ricinus. However, most studies assessed tick microbiomes without prior decontamination of the tick surface, which may alter the results and mislead conclusions regarding the composition of the tick-borne microbiome. The aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffmann, Angeline, Fingerle, Volker, Noll, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630152
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8070987
_version_ 1783567969991786496
author Hoffmann, Angeline
Fingerle, Volker
Noll, Matthias
author_facet Hoffmann, Angeline
Fingerle, Volker
Noll, Matthias
author_sort Hoffmann, Angeline
collection PubMed
description Various microbial pathogens have been found in ticks such as Ixodes ricinus. However, most studies assessed tick microbiomes without prior decontamination of the tick surface, which may alter the results and mislead conclusions regarding the composition of the tick-borne microbiome. The aim of this study was to test four different decontamination methods, namely (i.) 70% ethanol, (ii.) DNA Away, (iii.) 5% sodium hypochlorite and (iv.) Reactive Skin Decontamination Lotion (RSDL), which have been previously reported for tick surface and animal or human skin decontamination. To test the efficiency of decontamination, we contaminated each tick with a defined mixture of Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus, Pseudomonas fluorescens, dog saliva and human sweat. No contamination was used as a negative control, and for a positive control, a no decontamination strategy was carried out. After nucleic acid extraction, the recovery rate of contaminants was determined for RNA and DNA samples by qPCR and tick-borne microbiome analyses by bacterial 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Ticks treated with 5% sodium hypochlorite revealed the lowest number of contaminants followed by DNA Away, RSDL and 70% ethanol. Moreover, tick microbiomes after 5% sodium hypochlorite decontamination clustered with negative controls. Therefore, the efficiency of decontamination was optimal with 5% sodium hypochlorite and is recommended for upcoming studies to address the unbiased detection of tick-borne pathogens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7409031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74090312020-08-26 Analysis of Tick Surface Decontamination Methods Hoffmann, Angeline Fingerle, Volker Noll, Matthias Microorganisms Article Various microbial pathogens have been found in ticks such as Ixodes ricinus. However, most studies assessed tick microbiomes without prior decontamination of the tick surface, which may alter the results and mislead conclusions regarding the composition of the tick-borne microbiome. The aim of this study was to test four different decontamination methods, namely (i.) 70% ethanol, (ii.) DNA Away, (iii.) 5% sodium hypochlorite and (iv.) Reactive Skin Decontamination Lotion (RSDL), which have been previously reported for tick surface and animal or human skin decontamination. To test the efficiency of decontamination, we contaminated each tick with a defined mixture of Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus, Pseudomonas fluorescens, dog saliva and human sweat. No contamination was used as a negative control, and for a positive control, a no decontamination strategy was carried out. After nucleic acid extraction, the recovery rate of contaminants was determined for RNA and DNA samples by qPCR and tick-borne microbiome analyses by bacterial 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Ticks treated with 5% sodium hypochlorite revealed the lowest number of contaminants followed by DNA Away, RSDL and 70% ethanol. Moreover, tick microbiomes after 5% sodium hypochlorite decontamination clustered with negative controls. Therefore, the efficiency of decontamination was optimal with 5% sodium hypochlorite and is recommended for upcoming studies to address the unbiased detection of tick-borne pathogens. MDPI 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7409031/ /pubmed/32630152 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8070987 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hoffmann, Angeline
Fingerle, Volker
Noll, Matthias
Analysis of Tick Surface Decontamination Methods
title Analysis of Tick Surface Decontamination Methods
title_full Analysis of Tick Surface Decontamination Methods
title_fullStr Analysis of Tick Surface Decontamination Methods
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Tick Surface Decontamination Methods
title_short Analysis of Tick Surface Decontamination Methods
title_sort analysis of tick surface decontamination methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630152
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8070987
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmannangeline analysisofticksurfacedecontaminationmethods
AT fingerlevolker analysisofticksurfacedecontaminationmethods
AT nollmatthias analysisofticksurfacedecontaminationmethods