Cargando…

Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods

Methods of stool assessment are mostly focused on next-generation sequencing (NGS) or classical culturing, but only rarely both. We conducted a series of experiments using a multi-method approach to trace the stability of gut microbiota in various donors over time, to find the best method for the pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bilinski, Jaroslaw, Dziurzynski, Mikolaj, Grzesiowski, Pawel, Podsiadly, Edyta, Stelmaszczyk-Emmel, Anna, Dzieciatkowski, Tomasz, Dziewit, Lukasz, Basak, Grzegorz W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32610522
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072036
_version_ 1783567973583159296
author Bilinski, Jaroslaw
Dziurzynski, Mikolaj
Grzesiowski, Pawel
Podsiadly, Edyta
Stelmaszczyk-Emmel, Anna
Dzieciatkowski, Tomasz
Dziewit, Lukasz
Basak, Grzegorz W.
author_facet Bilinski, Jaroslaw
Dziurzynski, Mikolaj
Grzesiowski, Pawel
Podsiadly, Edyta
Stelmaszczyk-Emmel, Anna
Dzieciatkowski, Tomasz
Dziewit, Lukasz
Basak, Grzegorz W.
author_sort Bilinski, Jaroslaw
collection PubMed
description Methods of stool assessment are mostly focused on next-generation sequencing (NGS) or classical culturing, but only rarely both. We conducted a series of experiments using a multi-method approach to trace the stability of gut microbiota in various donors over time, to find the best method for the proper selection of fecal donors and to find “super-donor” indicators. Ten consecutive stools donated by each of three donors were used for the experiments (30 stools in total). The experiments assessed bacterial viability measured by flow cytometry, stool culturing on different media and in various conditions, and NGS (90 samples in total). There were no statistically significant differences between live and dead cell numbers; however, we found a group of cells classified as not-dead-not-alive, which may be possibly important in selection of “good” donors. Donor C, being a regular stool donor, was characterized by the largest number of cultivable species (64). Cultivable core microbiota (shared by all donors) was composed of only 16 species. ANCOM analysis of NGS data highlighted particular genera to be more abundant in one donor vs. the others. There was a correlation between the not-dead-not-alive group found in flow cytometry and Anaeroplasma found by NGS, and we could distinguish a regular stool donor from the others. In this work, we showed that combining various methods of microbiota assessment gives more information than each method separately.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7409046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74090462020-08-26 Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods Bilinski, Jaroslaw Dziurzynski, Mikolaj Grzesiowski, Pawel Podsiadly, Edyta Stelmaszczyk-Emmel, Anna Dzieciatkowski, Tomasz Dziewit, Lukasz Basak, Grzegorz W. J Clin Med Article Methods of stool assessment are mostly focused on next-generation sequencing (NGS) or classical culturing, but only rarely both. We conducted a series of experiments using a multi-method approach to trace the stability of gut microbiota in various donors over time, to find the best method for the proper selection of fecal donors and to find “super-donor” indicators. Ten consecutive stools donated by each of three donors were used for the experiments (30 stools in total). The experiments assessed bacterial viability measured by flow cytometry, stool culturing on different media and in various conditions, and NGS (90 samples in total). There were no statistically significant differences between live and dead cell numbers; however, we found a group of cells classified as not-dead-not-alive, which may be possibly important in selection of “good” donors. Donor C, being a regular stool donor, was characterized by the largest number of cultivable species (64). Cultivable core microbiota (shared by all donors) was composed of only 16 species. ANCOM analysis of NGS data highlighted particular genera to be more abundant in one donor vs. the others. There was a correlation between the not-dead-not-alive group found in flow cytometry and Anaeroplasma found by NGS, and we could distinguish a regular stool donor from the others. In this work, we showed that combining various methods of microbiota assessment gives more information than each method separately. MDPI 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7409046/ /pubmed/32610522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072036 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bilinski, Jaroslaw
Dziurzynski, Mikolaj
Grzesiowski, Pawel
Podsiadly, Edyta
Stelmaszczyk-Emmel, Anna
Dzieciatkowski, Tomasz
Dziewit, Lukasz
Basak, Grzegorz W.
Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods
title Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods
title_full Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods
title_fullStr Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods
title_short Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods
title_sort multimodal approach to assessment of fecal microbiota donors based on three complementary methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32610522
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072036
work_keys_str_mv AT bilinskijaroslaw multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
AT dziurzynskimikolaj multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
AT grzesiowskipawel multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
AT podsiadlyedyta multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
AT stelmaszczykemmelanna multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
AT dzieciatkowskitomasz multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
AT dziewitlukasz multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
AT basakgrzegorzw multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods