Cargando…

Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma: Past, Current, and Future Developments

This review describes the progress that the concept of adjuvant therapies has undergone in the last 50 years and focuses on the most recent development where an adjuvant approach has been scientifically evaluated in melanoma clinical trials. Over the past decade the development of immunotherapies an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Testori, Alessandro A. E., Chiellino, Silvia, van Akkooi, Alexander C.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32708268
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071994
_version_ 1783568048736698368
author Testori, Alessandro A. E.
Chiellino, Silvia
van Akkooi, Alexander C.J.
author_facet Testori, Alessandro A. E.
Chiellino, Silvia
van Akkooi, Alexander C.J.
author_sort Testori, Alessandro A. E.
collection PubMed
description This review describes the progress that the concept of adjuvant therapies has undergone in the last 50 years and focuses on the most recent development where an adjuvant approach has been scientifically evaluated in melanoma clinical trials. Over the past decade the development of immunotherapies and targeted therapies has drastically changed the treatment of stage IV melanoma patients. These successes led to trials studying the same therapies in the adjuvant setting, in high risk resected stage III and IV melanoma patients. Adjuvant immune checkpoint blockade with anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab was the first drug to show an improvement in recurrence-free and overall survival but this was accompanied by high severe toxicity rates. Therefore, these results were bypassed by adjuvant treatment with anti-PD-1 agents nivolumab and pembrolizumab and BRAF-directed target therapy, which showed even better recurrence-free survival rates with more favorable toxicity rates. The whole concept of adjuvant therapy may be integrated with the new neoadjuvant approaches that are under investigation through several clinical trials. However, there is still no data available on whether the effective adjuvant therapy that patients finally have at their disposal could be offered to them while waiting for recurrence, sparing at least 50% of them a potentially long-term toxic side effect but with the same rate of overall survival (OS). Adjuvant therapy for melanoma has radically changed over the past few years—anti-PD-1 or BRAF-directed therapy is the new standard of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7409361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74093612020-08-25 Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma: Past, Current, and Future Developments Testori, Alessandro A. E. Chiellino, Silvia van Akkooi, Alexander C.J. Cancers (Basel) Review This review describes the progress that the concept of adjuvant therapies has undergone in the last 50 years and focuses on the most recent development where an adjuvant approach has been scientifically evaluated in melanoma clinical trials. Over the past decade the development of immunotherapies and targeted therapies has drastically changed the treatment of stage IV melanoma patients. These successes led to trials studying the same therapies in the adjuvant setting, in high risk resected stage III and IV melanoma patients. Adjuvant immune checkpoint blockade with anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab was the first drug to show an improvement in recurrence-free and overall survival but this was accompanied by high severe toxicity rates. Therefore, these results were bypassed by adjuvant treatment with anti-PD-1 agents nivolumab and pembrolizumab and BRAF-directed target therapy, which showed even better recurrence-free survival rates with more favorable toxicity rates. The whole concept of adjuvant therapy may be integrated with the new neoadjuvant approaches that are under investigation through several clinical trials. However, there is still no data available on whether the effective adjuvant therapy that patients finally have at their disposal could be offered to them while waiting for recurrence, sparing at least 50% of them a potentially long-term toxic side effect but with the same rate of overall survival (OS). Adjuvant therapy for melanoma has radically changed over the past few years—anti-PD-1 or BRAF-directed therapy is the new standard of care. MDPI 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7409361/ /pubmed/32708268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071994 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Testori, Alessandro A. E.
Chiellino, Silvia
van Akkooi, Alexander C.J.
Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma: Past, Current, and Future Developments
title Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma: Past, Current, and Future Developments
title_full Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma: Past, Current, and Future Developments
title_fullStr Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma: Past, Current, and Future Developments
title_full_unstemmed Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma: Past, Current, and Future Developments
title_short Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma: Past, Current, and Future Developments
title_sort adjuvant therapy for melanoma: past, current, and future developments
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32708268
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071994
work_keys_str_mv AT testorialessandroae adjuvanttherapyformelanomapastcurrentandfuturedevelopments
AT chiellinosilvia adjuvanttherapyformelanomapastcurrentandfuturedevelopments
AT vanakkooialexandercj adjuvanttherapyformelanomapastcurrentandfuturedevelopments