Cargando…

Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0

BACKGROUND: The assessment of disability in a population is an important part of public health management. In this article, we examine the psychometric properties and validation of the Polish version of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. (12-item WHODAS 2.0). M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka, Sozański, Bernard, Kotarski, Hubert, Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska, Anna, Wiśniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32758211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09305-0
_version_ 1783568072873869312
author Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka
Sozański, Bernard
Kotarski, Hubert
Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska, Anna
Wiśniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka
author_facet Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka
Sozański, Bernard
Kotarski, Hubert
Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska, Anna
Wiśniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka
author_sort Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The assessment of disability in a population is an important part of public health management. In this article, we examine the psychometric properties and validation of the Polish version of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. (12-item WHODAS 2.0). METHODS: A systematic random sample comprised 584 adult urban residents. The Polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF, Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire were used to assess disability and quality of life, respectively. Basic sociodemographic data and selected health-related data (e.g., pain and depressive moods) were also collected. RESULTS: Good scale score reliability for the entire tool was confirmed in the study population (Cronbach’s α = 0.90; Composite reliability = 0.95). In confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), satisfactory values of the fit indices were obtained (comparative fit index, CFI = 0.999; Tucker-Lewis Index, TLI = 0.999; root mean square error of approximation, RMSEA = 0.004; standardized root mean square residual, SRMR = 0.043, p = 0.454). Good consistency was noted over time (correlation coefficient = 0.88). The tool was found to have an appropriate level of validity. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the 12-item WHODAS is short and easy to use, and it is suitable for use in the form of an interview during screening tests. This tool is appropriate for measuring the health status, functioning, and disability of an average population. It may be more relevant for studying populations with health problems. The 12-item WHODAS can be used to successfully obtain information about the general level of disability in a population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7409488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74094882020-08-07 Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka Sozański, Bernard Kotarski, Hubert Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska, Anna Wiśniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The assessment of disability in a population is an important part of public health management. In this article, we examine the psychometric properties and validation of the Polish version of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. (12-item WHODAS 2.0). METHODS: A systematic random sample comprised 584 adult urban residents. The Polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF, Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire were used to assess disability and quality of life, respectively. Basic sociodemographic data and selected health-related data (e.g., pain and depressive moods) were also collected. RESULTS: Good scale score reliability for the entire tool was confirmed in the study population (Cronbach’s α = 0.90; Composite reliability = 0.95). In confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), satisfactory values of the fit indices were obtained (comparative fit index, CFI = 0.999; Tucker-Lewis Index, TLI = 0.999; root mean square error of approximation, RMSEA = 0.004; standardized root mean square residual, SRMR = 0.043, p = 0.454). Good consistency was noted over time (correlation coefficient = 0.88). The tool was found to have an appropriate level of validity. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the 12-item WHODAS is short and easy to use, and it is suitable for use in the form of an interview during screening tests. This tool is appropriate for measuring the health status, functioning, and disability of an average population. It may be more relevant for studying populations with health problems. The 12-item WHODAS can be used to successfully obtain information about the general level of disability in a population. BioMed Central 2020-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7409488/ /pubmed/32758211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09305-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka
Sozański, Bernard
Kotarski, Hubert
Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska, Anna
Wiśniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka
Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
title Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
title_full Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
title_fullStr Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
title_short Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
title_sort psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item whodas 2.0
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32758211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09305-0
work_keys_str_mv AT cwirlejsozanskaagnieszka psychometricpropertiesandvalidationofthepolishversionofthe12itemwhodas20
AT sozanskibernard psychometricpropertiesandvalidationofthepolishversionofthe12itemwhodas20
AT kotarskihubert psychometricpropertiesandvalidationofthepolishversionofthe12itemwhodas20
AT wilmowskapietruszynskaanna psychometricpropertiesandvalidationofthepolishversionofthe12itemwhodas20
AT wisniowskaszurlejagnieszka psychometricpropertiesandvalidationofthepolishversionofthe12itemwhodas20