Cargando…

Is Adult Second Language Acquisition Defective?

There is a large literature showing that adult L2 learners, in contrast to children, often fail to acquire native-like competence in the second language. Because of such age effects, adult L2 learning is often viewed as “fundamentally different” from child acquisition and defective in some way. Howe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dąbrowska, Ewa, Becker, Laura, Miorelli, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849081
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01839
_version_ 1783568078342193152
author Dąbrowska, Ewa
Becker, Laura
Miorelli, Luca
author_facet Dąbrowska, Ewa
Becker, Laura
Miorelli, Luca
author_sort Dąbrowska, Ewa
collection PubMed
description There is a large literature showing that adult L2 learners, in contrast to children, often fail to acquire native-like competence in the second language. Because of such age effects, adult L2 learning is often viewed as “fundamentally different” from child acquisition and defective in some way. However, adult L2 learners do not always do worse than child learners. Several studies (e.g., Sasaki, 1997; Dąbrowska and Street, 2006; Street, 2017; Dąbrowska, 2019) found considerable overlap between L1 and L2 speakers’ performance on tasks tapping morphosyntactic knowledge. Crucially, these studies used grammatical comprehension tasks (e.g., picture selection) to test mastery of “functional” grammar (i.e., grammatical contrasts which correspond to a clear difference in meaning, such as the assignment of agent and patient roles in sentences with noncanonical word order and quantifier scope). In contrast, most ultimate attainment studies (e.g., Johnson and Newport, 1989; Flege et al., 1999; DeKeyser, 2000; DeKeyser et al., 2010) used a grammaticality judgment task (GST) which assessed mastery of “decorative” grammar, i.e., grammatical morphemes such as tense and agreement markers which make relatively little contribution to the meaning conveyed by a sentence. In this study, we directly compared native speakers, late immersion learners, and classroom foreign language learners on tasks assessing both aspects of grammar. As in earlier studies, we found significant differences between native speakers and both non-native groups in performance on “decorative” grammar, particularly when performance was assessed using spoken rather than written stimuli. However, the differences in performance on the “functional” grammar task were much smaller and statistically non-significant. Furthermore, even in the “decorative” grammar task, there was more overlap between native speakers and late L2 learners than reported in earlier research. We argue that this is because earlier studies underestimated the amount of variation found in native speakers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7409517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74095172020-08-25 Is Adult Second Language Acquisition Defective? Dąbrowska, Ewa Becker, Laura Miorelli, Luca Front Psychol Psychology There is a large literature showing that adult L2 learners, in contrast to children, often fail to acquire native-like competence in the second language. Because of such age effects, adult L2 learning is often viewed as “fundamentally different” from child acquisition and defective in some way. However, adult L2 learners do not always do worse than child learners. Several studies (e.g., Sasaki, 1997; Dąbrowska and Street, 2006; Street, 2017; Dąbrowska, 2019) found considerable overlap between L1 and L2 speakers’ performance on tasks tapping morphosyntactic knowledge. Crucially, these studies used grammatical comprehension tasks (e.g., picture selection) to test mastery of “functional” grammar (i.e., grammatical contrasts which correspond to a clear difference in meaning, such as the assignment of agent and patient roles in sentences with noncanonical word order and quantifier scope). In contrast, most ultimate attainment studies (e.g., Johnson and Newport, 1989; Flege et al., 1999; DeKeyser, 2000; DeKeyser et al., 2010) used a grammaticality judgment task (GST) which assessed mastery of “decorative” grammar, i.e., grammatical morphemes such as tense and agreement markers which make relatively little contribution to the meaning conveyed by a sentence. In this study, we directly compared native speakers, late immersion learners, and classroom foreign language learners on tasks assessing both aspects of grammar. As in earlier studies, we found significant differences between native speakers and both non-native groups in performance on “decorative” grammar, particularly when performance was assessed using spoken rather than written stimuli. However, the differences in performance on the “functional” grammar task were much smaller and statistically non-significant. Furthermore, even in the “decorative” grammar task, there was more overlap between native speakers and late L2 learners than reported in earlier research. We argue that this is because earlier studies underestimated the amount of variation found in native speakers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7409517/ /pubmed/32849081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01839 Text en Copyright © 2020 Dąbrowska, Becker and Miorelli. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Dąbrowska, Ewa
Becker, Laura
Miorelli, Luca
Is Adult Second Language Acquisition Defective?
title Is Adult Second Language Acquisition Defective?
title_full Is Adult Second Language Acquisition Defective?
title_fullStr Is Adult Second Language Acquisition Defective?
title_full_unstemmed Is Adult Second Language Acquisition Defective?
title_short Is Adult Second Language Acquisition Defective?
title_sort is adult second language acquisition defective?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849081
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01839
work_keys_str_mv AT dabrowskaewa isadultsecondlanguageacquisitiondefective
AT beckerlaura isadultsecondlanguageacquisitiondefective
AT miorelliluca isadultsecondlanguageacquisitiondefective