Cargando…

Intracranial vasculature 3D printing: review of techniques and manufacturing processes to inform clinical practice

BACKGROUND: In recent years, three-dimensional (3D) printing has been increasingly applied to the intracranial vasculature for patient-specific surgical planning, training, education, and research. Unfortunately, though, much of the prior literature regarding 3D printing has focused on the end-produ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cogswell, Petrice M., Rischall, Matthew A., Alexander, Amy E., Dickens, Hunter J., Lanzino, Giuseppe, Morris, Jonathan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32761490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-020-00071-8
_version_ 1783568116419133440
author Cogswell, Petrice M.
Rischall, Matthew A.
Alexander, Amy E.
Dickens, Hunter J.
Lanzino, Giuseppe
Morris, Jonathan M.
author_facet Cogswell, Petrice M.
Rischall, Matthew A.
Alexander, Amy E.
Dickens, Hunter J.
Lanzino, Giuseppe
Morris, Jonathan M.
author_sort Cogswell, Petrice M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, three-dimensional (3D) printing has been increasingly applied to the intracranial vasculature for patient-specific surgical planning, training, education, and research. Unfortunately, though, much of the prior literature regarding 3D printing has focused on the end-product and not the process. In addition, for 3D printing/manufacturing to occur on a large scale, challenges and bottlenecks specific to each modeled anatomy must be overcome. MAIN BODY: In this review article, limitations and considerations of each 3D printing processing step, as they relate to printing individual intracranial vasculature models and providing an active clinical service for a quaternary care center, are discussed. Relevant advantages and disadvantages of the available acquisition techniques (computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and digital subtraction angiography) are reviewed. Specific steps in segmentation, processing, and creation of a printable file may impede the workflow or degrade the fidelity of the printed model and are, therefore, given added attention. The various available printing techniques are compared with respect to printing the intracranial vasculature. Finally, applications are discussed, and a variety of example models are shown. CONCLUSION: In this review we provide insight into the manufacturing of 3D models of the intracranial vasculature that may facilitate incorporation into or improve utility of 3D vascular models in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7409717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74097172020-08-10 Intracranial vasculature 3D printing: review of techniques and manufacturing processes to inform clinical practice Cogswell, Petrice M. Rischall, Matthew A. Alexander, Amy E. Dickens, Hunter J. Lanzino, Giuseppe Morris, Jonathan M. 3D Print Med Review BACKGROUND: In recent years, three-dimensional (3D) printing has been increasingly applied to the intracranial vasculature for patient-specific surgical planning, training, education, and research. Unfortunately, though, much of the prior literature regarding 3D printing has focused on the end-product and not the process. In addition, for 3D printing/manufacturing to occur on a large scale, challenges and bottlenecks specific to each modeled anatomy must be overcome. MAIN BODY: In this review article, limitations and considerations of each 3D printing processing step, as they relate to printing individual intracranial vasculature models and providing an active clinical service for a quaternary care center, are discussed. Relevant advantages and disadvantages of the available acquisition techniques (computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and digital subtraction angiography) are reviewed. Specific steps in segmentation, processing, and creation of a printable file may impede the workflow or degrade the fidelity of the printed model and are, therefore, given added attention. The various available printing techniques are compared with respect to printing the intracranial vasculature. Finally, applications are discussed, and a variety of example models are shown. CONCLUSION: In this review we provide insight into the manufacturing of 3D models of the intracranial vasculature that may facilitate incorporation into or improve utility of 3D vascular models in clinical practice. Springer International Publishing 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7409717/ /pubmed/32761490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-020-00071-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Cogswell, Petrice M.
Rischall, Matthew A.
Alexander, Amy E.
Dickens, Hunter J.
Lanzino, Giuseppe
Morris, Jonathan M.
Intracranial vasculature 3D printing: review of techniques and manufacturing processes to inform clinical practice
title Intracranial vasculature 3D printing: review of techniques and manufacturing processes to inform clinical practice
title_full Intracranial vasculature 3D printing: review of techniques and manufacturing processes to inform clinical practice
title_fullStr Intracranial vasculature 3D printing: review of techniques and manufacturing processes to inform clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Intracranial vasculature 3D printing: review of techniques and manufacturing processes to inform clinical practice
title_short Intracranial vasculature 3D printing: review of techniques and manufacturing processes to inform clinical practice
title_sort intracranial vasculature 3d printing: review of techniques and manufacturing processes to inform clinical practice
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32761490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-020-00071-8
work_keys_str_mv AT cogswellpetricem intracranialvasculature3dprintingreviewoftechniquesandmanufacturingprocessestoinformclinicalpractice
AT rischallmatthewa intracranialvasculature3dprintingreviewoftechniquesandmanufacturingprocessestoinformclinicalpractice
AT alexanderamye intracranialvasculature3dprintingreviewoftechniquesandmanufacturingprocessestoinformclinicalpractice
AT dickenshunterj intracranialvasculature3dprintingreviewoftechniquesandmanufacturingprocessestoinformclinicalpractice
AT lanzinogiuseppe intracranialvasculature3dprintingreviewoftechniquesandmanufacturingprocessestoinformclinicalpractice
AT morrisjonathanm intracranialvasculature3dprintingreviewoftechniquesandmanufacturingprocessestoinformclinicalpractice