Cargando…

The effect of preventing subclinical transmission on the containment of COVID-19: Mathematical modeling and experience in Taiwan

The control strategies preventing subclinical transmission differed among countries. A stochastic transmission model was used to assess the potential effectiveness of control strategies at controlling the COVID-19 outbreak. Three strategies included lack of prevention of subclinical transmission (St...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsou, Hsiao-Hui, Cheng, Yu-Chieh, Yuan, Hsiang-Yu, Hsu, Ya-Ting, Wu, Hsiao-Yu, Lee, Fang-Jing, Hsiung, Chao A., Chen, Wei J., Sytwu, Huey-Kang, Wu, Shiow-Ing, Shih, Shu-Man, Wen, Tzai-Hung, Kuo, Shu-Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32771432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2020.106101
Descripción
Sumario:The control strategies preventing subclinical transmission differed among countries. A stochastic transmission model was used to assess the potential effectiveness of control strategies at controlling the COVID-19 outbreak. Three strategies included lack of prevention of subclinical transmission (Strategy A), partial prevention using testing with different accuracy (Strategy B) and complete prevention by isolating all at-risk people (Strategy C, Taiwan policy). The high probability of containing COVID-19 in Strategy C is observed in different scenario, had varied in the number of initial cases (5, 20, and 40), the reproduction number (1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3.5), the proportion of at-risk people being investigated (40%, 60%, 80%, to 90%), the delay from symptom onset to isolation (long and short), and the proportion of transmission that occurred before symptom onset (<1%, 15%, and 30%). Strategy C achieved probability of 80% under advantageous scenario, such as low number of initial cases and high coverage of epidemiological investigation but Strategy B and C rarely achieved that of 60%. Considering the unsatisfactory accuracy of current testing and insufficient resources, isolation of all at-risk people, as adopted in Taiwan, could be an effective alternative.